REDUCED First Omega Constellation 2648-1

Posts
441
Likes
3,606
Hi everybody,
I'm offering my Omega Costellation Ref. 2648-1 from 1952
The first Constellation Chronomètre

Model: Omega Constellation
Ref.: 2648-1
Movement: Cal. 354 bumper
Year: 1952
Case: Unpolished with some light scratches. Upper right lug slightly bent
Crown: Original 10 sided with Omega logo
Dial: Crosshair, arrow shaped markers, dauphine hands ,
applied Omega logo and Constellation star.
Central sweep-second hand not original, it should be shorter
Strap: unsigned stainless steel vintage beads of rice


Ask € 2,400 (Shipping and payment to be agreed)
Reference as a seller on request

Feel free to contact me for further information or clarifications

The watch and me are located in France

Thanks to OF for the space granted

Edited:
 
Posts
2,201
Likes
15,533
Is that top right lug bent? Or is it just the photos or my 23 o'clock friday night eyes playing a trick.
 
Posts
6,533
Likes
26,491
Is that top right lug bent? Or is it just the photos or my 23 o'clock friday night eyes playing a trick.
It does look bent & twisted and also misshapen compared to the others. The lug holes are stretched.

Edited:
 
Posts
441
Likes
3,606
Is that top right lug bent? Or is it just the photos or my 23 o'clock friday night eyes playing a trick.

Hi, is just the pic, yours 23 o'clock friday night eyes works well

 
Posts
2,201
Likes
15,533
Hi, is just the pic, yours 23 o'clock friday night eyes works well

What I was referring to is this angle, but I believe your IRL opinion better than me looking at pictures. Maybe you want to clear out any missconception by better front on pictues that shows that lug is not bent 😀
 
Posts
441
Likes
3,606
What I was referring to is this angle, but I believe your IRL opinion better than me looking at pictures. Maybe you want to clear out any missconception by better front on pictues that shows that lug is not bent 😀

Is this pic enough or do you need that I take others?

 
Posts
2,056
Likes
4,183
Is this pic enough or do you need that I take others?


That is a side picture. He is requesting a Front pic showing the 12 o clock lugs face on. There clearly looks to be damage on the lug in the picture.
 
Posts
441
Likes
3,606
That is a side picture. He is requesting a Front pic showing the 12 o clock lugs face on. There clearly looks to be damage on the lug in the picture.

 
Posts
2,201
Likes
15,533
That lug definitely looks a bit damaged to me and bent (and maybe bent back again).

I'm not looking to trash your listing so sorry for that, just notifying something any potential buyer probably also would want to know. Something that is relevant info to put in when describing the watch, but you are the one having the watch in your hands so your judgement would probably be the more accurate and not ours just looking at pictures.

Good luck with the sale! 😀
 
Posts
1,561
Likes
12,262
If we compare length of the lugs, right one is clearly "shorter" which implies lug being bent.
 
Posts
441
Likes
3,606
I understand , in the following pics I made a projection of the lines and it shows that one is not perfectly straight but it deviates slightly by lengthening the projection. I apologize

 
Posts
441
Likes
3,606
However all this does not detract from the beauty, originality and rarity of the watch