Jesus I must have been seeing things last night, its still cool for the money tbh so if you change your mind on it I'll take it at whatever you paid for it genuinely sorry about that, thanks Mike and others for noticing I genuinely in my mind saw a 2310 even though I wrote 1275 which is clearly what it is
I think you are right, the ones in museum are not flipped,too. So probably this one is an old redial........too bad.
At this point, Mike usually lays down a pic of an NOS one to definitively resolve the debate. Mike? Cue!
Good eye. But the flip is correct I believe, here's an NOS from Matt Bain http://www.matthewbaininc.com/watch-details/391
Nope they don't all have the flip. I have seen dials with and without the flip that to my eyes look original. On the other hand for the round cosmics, all the originals that I have seen did not have the flip.
As I said- All the google image search watches I saw have the flip(upright). I looked at 30 rows. And I am only talking about the square cosmics, that's the Op question. Of course round Cosmics have the flip(upside down)
That I have seen square cosmic moonphase dials that look original to me with the flip and without the flip.
