justintime
·Looks like ok to me apart from the two second hands and the bezel which is super rare anyway, is the date range wrong on the movement ? what's wrong with it?.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
I saw this one before seen your post, thought it was a bit too shiny to be an original dial....don't you think?
Cal. 501 Seamaster with a nice original black dial: Seller did a decent job of photographing the dial. Not an easy thing to do. gatorcpa
I see the minute hashes misaligned on either side of 12 index. I don't think Omega would of let it go out like that, back then.
Looking carefully at the fonts of OMEGA Automatic, compare to this: http://omegaforums.net/data/attachments/19/19189-9cbcaf198a84dc44035086a5fbd6e8bc.jpg
It looks like the 12 o'clock marker is not centered in this example either. It believe it is called perspective distortion.
Interesting Seamaster box.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/VINTAGE-RAR...140?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item486954bbfc
I had a snipe bid for $120 so, not me.
Very nice 18k Seamaster. Tempting...
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/151354024043?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1423.l2649
hi new new to the site and I was also looking at the omega seamaster, but doing a search on the numbers on the case and it sates that the watch is stainless steel, so does this make this watch a frankenstien , can't find 18k for the date of manufacture....I'm new and learning, thanks for reading.
Actually, the 2849 reference was commonly made in both 14K and 18K gold, I've got a 14K version with deluxe dial. Welcome to Omegaforums mate!