Question About the Originality of my Omega Seamaster300

Posts
8
Likes
1
If there is anything else you guys would like to see, please let me know and I will do my best to send pictures.
 
Posts
11,960
Likes
20,796
I believe your question has been answered.

Is there anything else you’d like to know?
 
Posts
8
Likes
1
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with a movement # of 19mil, it dates the movement to 62(ish) which doesn't fit the era of this case. ?
No "T-SWISS MADE-T " on the dial and odd looking bezel with no lume at a glance. I'd be interested to know if there's any lume on that bezel. ?
To clarify there is Lume, pictures must not do it justice.
 
Posts
8
Likes
1
I believe your question has been answered.

Is there anything else you’d like to know?
If there is I will be back to ask. Thank you for taking your time to respond. It is much appreciated.
 
Posts
8
Likes
1
I believe your question has been answered.

Is there anything else you’d like to know?
I do have one last question! What were the problems you saw with this watch?
 
Posts
3,988
Likes
8,903
We would like to see a good pic of the back of the case back.
 
Posts
11,960
Likes
20,796
I do have one last question! What were the problems you saw with this watch?

I’ve got to say I’m not seeing any issues with fake parts on this one. It does look like a franken; original vintage case
Service dial, hands and bezel
Mid-matched movement that may not have started life in a sm300.
 
Posts
3,988
Likes
8,903
I see red flags. Do you own this watch or looking to buy?
 
Posts
207
Likes
211
I think it’s obvious from the title thread that it already is his watch. Also why do you think that print is laser etched? I thought laser etched would look more sharp and consistent than in OPs pics.
 
Posts
3,988
Likes
8,903
I'm saying it's not struck with a die. My case is an HF but there is an obvious difference