Poor Speedmaster slept in the bottom of the drawer for 15 years

Posts
5,273
Likes
24,066
There's a quick way to figure out whether it's a 321 or 861 Speedy! With my iPhone I can capture slow-motion videos. Then it's easy to see whether the chrono-second hand moves 5 or 6 times per second.

EDIT: sorry I guess I should explain better:

145.012 with 321 has a beat rate of 18000/hour = 5 times/sec
145.022 with 861 has a beat rate of 21600/hour = 6 times/sec

Thats brilliant
 
Posts
905
Likes
1,594
There's a quick way to figure out whether it's a 321 or 861 Speedy! With my iPhone I can capture slow-motion videos. Then it's easy to see whether the chrono-second hand moves 5 or 6 times per second.

EDIT: sorry I guess I should explain better:

145.012 with 321 has a beat rate of 18000/hour = 5 times/sec
145.022 with 861 has a beat rate of 21600/hour = 6 times/sec
This guy.... hoist him up.

Solution + great piece of information = You win.
 
Posts
495
Likes
595
Thanks guys (and gals?) I played around taking a slow-motion video of my 145.012-67 a while back to see whether the chrono minute hand jumps over exactly at the minute and stumbled upon this useful bit of info........

I always think there's too little emphasis on the fact that all 861/1861 Speedy's have the wrong beat-rate for the dial (which is divided for timing 1/5 of a second).

I'm eagerly awaiting what this Speedy's insides are made of......
 
Posts
11
Likes
25
Well guys, i gave maxbelg's slow mo vid a try.
Anyone want to have a guess what the result was?...
 
Posts
11
Likes
25
Hahaha......
Only a half second out grizzly, so not a bad guess....
Actually my old speedy isn't so speedy after all, and has a slow beating heart.
Looks like it may be a 145.012
 
Posts
1,413
Likes
2,945
Hahaha......
Only a half second out grizzly, so not a bad guess....
Actually my old speedy isn't so speedy after all, and has a slow beating heart.
Looks like it may be a 145.012
::rimshot::::rimshot::::rimshot::::psy::::psy::::psy::.......Hurrah!
 
Posts
384
Likes
686
What a great story and what an ingenious way of finding out what movement is inside.
 
Posts
1,042
Likes
1,339
...so you may have lucked out a bit there.

Lucked out means the opposite in the UK to what it means in the US.
 
Posts
16
Likes
1
Hi all.....
Dave is the name, and this is my first post.

Hi Dave, this is my third post 😀

1. I don´t have the receipt from when the watch went to Omega for the service and replacement hands, and i can´t remember if the dial was replaced at the same time. Stupid i know, but i really didn´t have much interest, or appreciate the watch at that time.
Having done some reading last night, i suspect that it was, but i would really appreciate it if anyone can confirm this. Please see pics

2. Can anyone recommend someone in UK that can do a service and check the watch over for me. I will send it to Omega if need be, but would rather not.

3. I would like to have either a genuine Omega stainless bracelet, or leather strap fitted. By looking at the attached pictures, can anybody tell me what model bracelet strap would fit, and maybe best place to find one (it would be great if one was available here on the forum)

4. I would also like to fit a new push button to the watch. Can anyone advise the correct serial number.

Ok all, thanks in advance for any help offered, and have a great weekend ahead.

All the best.
Dave.

1. Doesn't look like the dial on a 145.022-69 I just inherited, but it may be just the photo mine has a distinct inner circle around the seconds marker that bisects the lume batons.

2. micheal jones (as in the big chain of jewellers) will pop the back off and check the omega service record for £20 which is what I did to check mine was/ is genuine. Should be able to find one locally rather than find a boutique.
 
Posts
11
Likes
25
Hi CutGlass.
Thanks for the observations.
You are correct, my watch does not have the original dial. It was changed out some years ago, and the guys here think it probably a service dial from the 90's.
The watch needs some work anyhow, so i plan to send it off in next week or two.
Hopefully i will find out more about it at that time
 
Posts
11
Likes
25
As my watch looks like it may be a 145.012 model, would it be recommended that i look for an original 145.012 dial to replace the existing service dial.
As this watch hasnt actually cost me anything, except the equivalent of a few hundred pounds many years ago, I would feel happy spending a bit to get it back to original.
Any thoughts on the above would be welcome.
 
Posts
11,906
Likes
20,704
I'd get it to a good vintage watchmaker first to confirm the movement type, serial number and caseback reference number, so you know exactly what you have.

One option would be to replace your dial with a modern service dial which has more resemblance to the original (applied logo etc). You could look to source a period correct dial, but if it is a 321 cal, you're talking a couple of grand +! It'll be worth it though.
 
Posts
495
Likes
595
As my watch looks like it may be a 145.012 model, would it be recommended that i look for an original 145.012 dial to replace the existing service dial............

How far you want to go is up to you. Personally I'd MUCH rather source a period-correct dial than a new service dial, but then I went to extreme lengths to get my Speedy into a great and period-correct shape:
https://omegaforums.net/threads/thoughts-on-a-145-012-67.65807/
 
Posts
458
Likes
619
Hi Dave, as mentioned above, Simon Freese (or STS if Simon is too busy), will give you honest and sensible advice, and service your watch beautifully. Personally I would have a service, keeping the watch as is, and wear it daily.
This forum has the most generous and excellent members, place a WTB (want to buy) Ad here, and eventually the correct dial will become available hopefully at a sensible price 👍
 
Posts
3,773
Likes
8,554
A 105.012-66 has the single step case back. So the possibility is there, however the pushers are screw in and too tall, but they were replaced so we cannot rely on those. The shape of the lugs shows no residual facets of the 66CB and the lugs dont look right for a 66HF.
However it could have been polished.

So in my humble opinion the likely options are a 145.022 or a 145.012. My gut is telling me it might be a 145.012 but that is perhaps because I love a fairytale happy ending.

My gut says 145.022-69, but get that case back off and post some pics of inside and movement number. You can't discuss a thing until you first know what it is you are looking at is good advice taken
Edited:
 
Posts
3,773
Likes
8,554

Well let me be contrary for a moment. I don't think anything has been established at all. I will withhold judgement until we see the inside case back reference number, see the movement and know the movement number. I agree that there are indications it might be a 321 based on the tick count, but you are assuming that the chronograph mechanism is correctly adjusted. On a poorly adjusted Chrono the ticks will not always be even or regular. Just repeating what I think a few watchmakers who know 321/861 movements I suspect would tell you. I mean I am far happier seeing the evidence with my own eyes. Don't fully disregard that method but it assumes much at this stage, I suspect.

🍿