I don’t see a 120 years worth of watchmaking history going out of the window for this episode at all.
Everyone was left scratching their heads over this watch and now the story is breaking.
In this world of cancel culture it would be very easy to bury a brand but at the end of the day what has happened here has been done by many people/dealers and nearly every brand has had its franken watches.
This is in no way a fault of Omega as a company. Does anyone look at their collection of beautiful vintage Omega watches any different now?
I like my Omega watches all the more. I do not see this making parts and examples cheaper or more available for the common everyday stuff.
Given that I self service most of my watches. They have parts from what ever source I can get. I did a study back in the 1990s on Dial repainting. Which I am considering reviving again. I am actively looking for a case for the 351 movement which was assembled from random parts.
But these are my watches, which are for my own enjoyment.
Will make it a bit difficult If I ever to want to sell any of the pieces I tire of. As anything I might list would be suspect. Full disclosure on my part of course. But if I sell low, what is to prevent someone from flipping the watch? There is no real way to track the service history of anything. It will be up to the collector to be savvy about what is being offered. Most auctions have weasel words which begin with Caveat Emptor. Sometimes I think the film "Red Violin." is a documentary. This watch is no different than that fictional object. And I suspect there will be books and films about this situation as well. It is highly entertaining.
When I was studying with my late friends, and even people like George Daniels, Derick Pratt, and Phillipe du Four. Stressed the ability to make ANY part with any grade of finish. With the advent of computer machining, EDM, and CAD design. Most anything can be replicated. I bought a CNC and built an EDM. Even the CAD program used in the 1990s to design watches. Operating all this takes time and skill.
I have been checking my digital backups as I found the archival format I used is no longer supported by the current Mac OS. Some of these formats are even proprietary (A popular format called stuffit.) Mac files when moved to a Windows PC lose metadata. I had to write some scripts so I can see what is in the files and weather or not it is worth booting an old computer or running an emulator. At least the computer game people currently keep the old virtual machines running. But the data has to be in a form the machine can deal with. If the metadata is lost then the whole backup is just random bits.
But as usual I digress. I just wanted to note that a lot of this data is attempts of CAD drawings of old clocks watches and of course the Automatons built by the Jaquet Droz family. The time to spend programing in the virtual part is substantial.
This sort of skill does not seem to be all that rewarded. It is treated more as an expendable trade, than an art. Sure the talented (or lucky ones) that can really use this tech are well paid. But what happens when they become bored. Or want a challenge?
Currently 3D metal printing is still a bit rough especially for small parts. What happens when this gets combined with AI and becomes more practical. Note that simple 3D plastic printers are available in schools and libraries, Many kids know how to use them.
I think this sort of thing may become all the more of a risk.
Not that any of this is new. Paintings and sculpture have been forged (copied for years.) Look how every Vermeer painting is suspect.
I do not see why watches should be any different. Most of this is illusion anyway.