Phillips auction Speedmaster - a 3.000.000-fake?

Posts
4,851
Likes
70,331
Maybe I am missing the point but for Omega to be able to command bragging rights for a record price for an item that they purchased seems a bit hollow to me.
I can totally understand somebody up the chain being hoodwinked by someone they believed to be the expert.
 
Posts
12,632
Likes
17,061
Maybe I am missing the point but for Omega to be able to command bragging rights for a record price for an item that they purchased seems a bit hollow to me.
I can totally understand somebody up the chain being hoodwinked by someone they believed to be the expert.
Color me skeptical. Too many things do not add up.

Omega has been known to cut corners before, see 2007 OmegaMania. There were several watches in that auction that were obvious redials that were not disclosed. Some were quietly purchased by Omega, some were not.

I like their historic watches, but today’s company is not what it once was.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
215
Likes
920
If the brand wants the best watches for their museum they are likely to consult their own experts. And if that person says that this is the best Speedmaster in the world and that it should be acquired at any cost I don’t see the problem in that. A normal day at the Geneva auctions this would have sold for a record price of 500k and everyone would have been happy. A crazy day it would have reached 1m. Not 3.

The Fribourg dealer, the parts dealer and potentially the three employees were the ones to benefit greatly. I am sure the court will end up with that conclusion too since the evidence is easy with the extract, the fake serial bridge and the story which were confirmed by one of the employees after the sale.
 
Posts
27,677
Likes
70,322
Maybe I am missing the point but for Omega to be able to command bragging rights for a record price for an item that they purchased seems a bit hollow to me.
I can totally understand somebody up the chain being hoodwinked by someone they believed to be the expert.

Yes, the idea that they conspired with their own employees, and some known to be shady dealers, and paid a record amount just for bragging rights, is nonsensical.

I don’t believe that Omega had a whole lot to gain from this. I don’t believe that they have ever really tried to capitalize on this sale with some big PR or advertising campaign. The new 321 was already in demand, so there’s really little in the way of gain here. It’s not like we saw the values of all vintage Speedmasters jump up because of this one anomaly of a sale. Even hard core collectors here saw it as just being a one off.

It just doesn’t make any sense...
 
Posts
6,711
Likes
21,665
Color me skeptical. Omega has been known to cut corners before, see 2007 OmegaMania. There were several watches in that auction that were obvious redials that were not disclosed. Some were quietly purchased by Omega, some were not.

I like their historic watches, but today’s company is not what it once was.
gatorcpa

I’m not sure your “then and now” company comparison is really fair. When you refer to the “then,” how far back you does one need to go from your perspective to when the company was mostly squeaky clean? As you’re well aware, the luxury watch market today cannot be compared to years ago. There is much more interest, expense, status and finances involved now than ever before. Things are much more competitive and cutthroat. I’m sure it’s a way bigger company than years ago, and certainly harder to police all employees. Then there’s the issue of cultural morality and ethics slippage in general. They don’t really come off as a bad actor in my book. They never went after two women who made kid’s clocks for copyright infringement like another douchey company. So there’s that…
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,361
Yes, the idea that they conspired with their own employees, and some known to be shady dealers, and paid a record amount just for bragging rights, is nonsensical.

I don’t believe that Omega had a whole lot to gain from this. I don’t believe that they have ever really tried to capitalize on this sale with some big PR or advertising campaign. The new 321 was already in demand, so there’s really little in the way of gain here. It’s not like we saw the values of all vintage Speedmasters jump up because of this one anomaly of a sale. Even hard core collectors here saw it as just being a one off.

It just doesn’t make any sense...

I think there’s potentially two separate but related things happening at the same time:

1 - a conspiracy to build a watch and sell it for a lot of money.

2 - some sort of bidding shenanigans by the Big O. Publicly they stopped bidding through the named person at 600,000CHF. If they just wanted to buy it, why did they have someone bidding against them who was ultimately buying it for them?

There’s more than a little weird nonsense going on.

As to the bragging rights/nonsensical comment - you’re not wrong, however I’ve worked in Comms and marketing for a long time… and I have seen a lot of really stupid stuff done in the name of marketing/bragging. Dumb knows no limits ::facepalm1::
Edited:
 
Posts
215
Likes
920
I think there’s potentially two separate but related things happening at the same time:

1 - a conspiracy to build a watch and sell it for a lot of money.

2 - some sort of bidding shenanigans by the Big O. Publicly they stopped bidding through the named person at 600,000CHF. If they wanted just wanted to buy it, why did they have someone bidding against them who was ultimately buying it for them?

There’s more than a little weird nonsense going on.

As to the bragging rights/nonsensical comment - you’re not wrong, however I’ve worked in Comms and marketing for a long time… and I have seen a lot of really stupid stuff done in the name of marketing/bragging. Dumb knows no limits ::facepalm1::
2 Perhaps the head of the museum was thinking to go to 600 as planned and the other accomplices in the scheme screwed him by going way beyond as they knew he had a carte blanche. One of the employees is very high up in the hierarchy at Omega and could without a doubt register as a buyer on their behalf.

Just speculating. Or he just wasn’t that comfortable bidding that crazy in the room. They would still have made a lot of money if it hammered at 600k and they would probably been able to continue their work. And potentially prepare and sell/buy more pieces. Now someone got greedy instead.
 
Posts
27,677
Likes
70,322
Dumb knows no limits

Correct. IMO Hanlon's razor is in full effect here...

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

Even if there were "bidding shenanigans" to clearly say that was a plan on Omega's part, or that they were directly involved in this whole creation, is a stretch.
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,361
P PerJ
2 Perhaps the head of the museum was thinking to go to 600 as planned and the other accomplices in the scheme screwed him by going way beyond as they knew he had a carte blanche. One of the employees is very high up in the hierarchy at Omega and could without a doubt register as a buyer on their behalf.

Just speculating. Or he just wasn’t that comfortable bidding that crazy in the room. They would still have made a lot of money if it hammered at 600k and they would probably been able to continue their work. And potentially prepare and sell/buy more pieces. Now someone got greedy instead.

You’re assuming he had the ability to spend whatever he wanted - I do not believe that to be the case.

The suggestion that someone whose role has nothing to do with acquisitions for the museum could register as a buyer seems unrealistic.

I’m repeating myself here - but there is more to this than the carefully constructed press release from Omega states.
 
Posts
4,653
Likes
17,621
I’m not sure your “then and now” company comparison is really fair. When you refer to the “then,” how far back you does one need to go from your perspective to when the company was mostly squeaky clean? As you’re well aware, the luxury watch market today cannot be compared to years ago. There is much more interest, expense, status and finances involved now than ever before. Things are much more competitive and cutthroat. I’m sure it’s a way bigger company than years ago, and certainly harder to police all employees. Then there’s the issue of cultural morality and ethics slippage in general. They don’t really come off as a bad actor in my book. They never went after two women who made kid’s clocks for copyright infringement like another douchey company. So there’s that…

Very true - and also is it fair to expect corporate employees to live up to say the ethical and moral standard of for instance a UK Prime Minster or a Scottish first minister…. Let he who cast the first stone and all that ;0)
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,361
Correct. IMO Hanlon's razor is in full effect here...

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

Even if there were "bidding shenanigans" to clearly say that was a plan on Omega's part, or that they were directly involved in this whole creation, is a stretch.

If they weren’t involved, then why have the Head of Museum bidding and a Chinese intermediary?

In their own statement they say that the Chinese buyer was bidding for Omega. See milt against their own public bids from the Head of Museum.

It’s all nonsense.
 
Posts
215
Likes
920
You’re assuming he had the ability to spend whatever he wanted - I do not believe that to be the case.

The suggestion that someone whose role has nothing to do with acquisitions for the museum could register as a buyer seems unrealistic.

I’m repeating myself here - but there is more to this than the carefully constructed press release from Omega states.
According to the news this watch was to be bought at any price. If the head was part of the group the co-conspiriators could very well have access to the Phillips account to place bids.

It is very easy to see who benefitted from the auction. Hint; it is not the party that paid 5-10 times what the watch was worth. 😀
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,361
P PerJ
According to the news this watch was to be bought at any price. If the head was part of the group the co-conspiriators could very well have access to the Phillips account to place bids.

It is very easy to see who benefitted from this. Hint; it is not the party that paid 5-10 times what the watch was worth. 😀

If the HoM was allowed to bid whatever he wanted - why did he stop at 600k, and why did they keep bidding through Proxies?

It does not make sense.
 
Posts
27,677
Likes
70,322
f they weren’t involved, then why have the Head of Museum bidding and a Chinese intermediary?

Watch companies use others to bid on their behalf...that’s not news. They want to make it look like collectors are buying these, rather than the brand. Not something I condone certainly, but that still doesn’t prove that they were actively involved in the entire scheme to create this watch.
 
Posts
215
Likes
920
If the HoM was allowed to bid whatever he wanted - why did he stop at 600k, and why did they keep bidding through Proxies?

It does not make sense.
As I speculated. It could have been the plan all along to bid it up to 600k and be happy with it. And someone else got greedy and wanted five times more. Or it just seemes stupid to sit in the room and bid like an idiot. Since the HoM told Jose after the auction I get a feeling he had no idea Omega actually won the lot. But who knows…

Regardless I don’t see how Omega would be behind this mess. They wouldn’t point to a fake serial bridge if that was the case. They would just have placed the watch in the museum regardless what Jose wrote on this blog a long time after the auction.
 
Posts
27,677
Likes
70,322
If the HoM was allowed to bid whatever he wanted - why did he stop at 600k, and why did they keep bidding through Proxies?

It does not make sense.

According to Jose, he was only allowed to bid to 600k...
 
Posts
12,632
Likes
17,061
P PerJ
And someone else got greedy and wanted five times more.
And five times the buyer’s fee too? You think Omega paid that?

Their biggest sin was being asleep at the switch during the auction. But I refuse to believe that no one outside of those accused by Omega knew nothing about what was happening.

As I said before, no one has clean hands here.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
215
Likes
920
And five times the buyer’s fee too?

As I said before, no one has clean hands here.
gatorcpa
In this case they are the least bad. They didn’t put the watch together, fake provenance and proxy bid the watch to 3m. They consigned a nice watch and made a poor deacription. Pretty much theirs, and their competitors, business model. 😀
 
Posts
12,632
Likes
17,061
P PerJ
They consigned a nice watch and made a poor deacription.
“They” also had to know about the prior sale of the watch and the estimates reflected this. You think “they” weren’t wise to the funny business with the bidding? But “they” didn’t care because the commission rose with the price.

I hope the truth is revealed some day, but I know better.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
8,890
Likes
28,361
I hope the truth is revealed some day, but I know better.

Given the reputations of both organisations involved, I would suggest that there's more chance of me finishing the next London Marathon in first place, than there is of us ever hearing the truth.