Oyster Perpetual 39mm or Aqua Terra 41mm?

Posts
89
Likes
76
is this a forever watch or something youll wear for a while then move onto another? if its forever then get whatever you enjoy more. However if its something youll wear for a bit and then sell/trade to get another I'd get the Rolex as it will most likely have a better resell value
 
Posts
27
Likes
116
Having owned a couple Rolex watches and a couple Omega watches, I think I can fairly opine they are neck-and-neck in quality and achievement, although Rolex seems to do a better job "spinning" the marketing (e.g. inferring Hillary actually wore an Explorer to the top of Everest).

Personally I'm kinda done with the ridiculous Rolex hype. My only remaining watch is an Omega and I really love it.
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
UPDATE:

So after deciding to buy the OP, I strut into the local Rolex Boutique looking for the black dial OP 39. Unfortunately they, or any Rolex dealers in London for that matter didn't have a single piece in stock; thus I ask to be notified when one comes in.

I got the call 2 weeks ago and was seriously excited to finally get the chance to buy one.
Guess what I saw when I checked out the OP display?

They thought I had been referring to the white dial OP rather than the black dial I was after (despite stressing the fact that I didn't want the white dial at the time). The person who took down my request adamantly denied that I asked for the black dial and that I was mistaken. We chalked it down to miscommunication in the end. Another OP 39mm would take at least a month.

After looking over the boutique, only seeing PM day-dates laden with diamonds and listening to the SA rambling about how Rolex was the best; I decided enough was enough and walked out, never to return.

I knew it wouldn't be easy/quick getting a Rolex, but if that's how it works then I'll be happy to stick with Omega.

If it were me I'd wait another month for the black dial, ignoring the blather from the SA about Rolex superiority.

I have nothing against Omega, since I own 5x more Omega watches than Rolex, but based on your original post it seems very appropriate. Otherwise, why not have just kept your SM300 that you sold? At least with that model you had a refined looking watch that you could use the bezel for timing cooking or parking, etc.

You had to have taken a big loss on the Omega sale, since they lose so much value going out the door, so if you buy another Omega you might want to consider used. With the Rolex, you should be quite safe buying at MSRP from the AD, should you change your mind later.
 
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,706
UPDATE:

So after deciding to buy the OP, I strut into the local Rolex Boutique looking for the black dial OP 39. Unfortunately they, or any Rolex dealers in London for that matter didn't have a single piece in stock; thus I ask to be notified when one comes in.

I got the call 2 weeks ago and was seriously excited to finally get the chance to buy one.
Guess what I saw when I checked out the OP display?

They thought I had been referring to the white dial OP rather than the black dial I was after (despite stressing the fact that I didn't want the white dial at the time). The person who took down my request adamantly denied that I asked for the black dial and that I was mistaken. We chalked it down to miscommunication in the end. Another OP 39mm would take at least a month.

After looking over the boutique, only seeing PM day-dates laden with diamonds and listening to the SA rambling about how Rolex was the best; I decided enough was enough and walked out, never to return.

I knew it wouldn't be easy/quick getting a Rolex, but if that's how it works then I'll be happy to stick with Omega.

Not sure what AD you went into but that sounds the complete opposite of what I have experienced in either a Rolex or Omega or any other watch store. Yes there can be misunderstandings my AD showed me a YM40 with the blue dial when I was last in the shop, the watch was ordered in for a customer who wanted the 'blue' one, when he came to collect the customer stated 'no I wanted the blue one, the one with the blue hands and text.......... not the one with the red hands and text'

Mistakes do happen, if you really want the OP go and get it, if you only have a month to wait it will be Christmas when it arrives and what better present could you wish for.
 
Posts
139
Likes
413
How important is the date for you?
I mean the date feature on the watch, not the date on which the watch becomes available.
 
Posts
1,704
Likes
5,425
How important is the date for you?
I mean the date feature on the watch, not the date on which the watch becomes available.
The Oyster Perpetual doesn't have a date function.
 
Posts
233
Likes
687
Looking at the OP every morning, will almost no add any new sensation, why? , because its design and their elements are so classic, over-know, predictable, everything is already ´recorded´ on our minds…for years.

Get the AT, fresh, young, modern aesthetics, innovative on every corner…

One is an established successful lawyer, the AT a vigorous young entrepreneur.
 
Posts
108
Likes
81
I think you've made the right decision in giving Rolex a miss - these purchases are meant to be fun rather than a drawn out struggle.
 
Posts
62
Likes
115
Maybe consider purchasing a mint-ish, pre-owned Omega that you love to wear/look at!

From there, you can decide one or two things:

1) Do I want or need the brand new experience? (I've not experienced this, but see a ton of positive vibes along the forum from those who have)

2) Do I still feel drawn to the/a Rolex?

The savings you will experience from going this route initially could better position you for either of the options above if they remain a desire. Just food for thought.
 
Posts
139
Likes
413
The Oyster Perpetual doesn't have a date function.
Exactly. That is why I ask. I consider functionallity decisive In chosing the right time piece. As an example, a watch without date function is a definitive no-go for me, since I need it constantly in the line of duty. Maybe other people do not need it at all.
 
Posts
1,704
Likes
5,425
Exactly. That is why I ask. I consider functionallity decisive In chosing the right time piece. As an example, a watch without date function is a definitive no-go for me, since I need it constantly in the line of duty. Maybe other people do not need it at all.
I understand completely. I simply assumed that if the date function (or absence thereof) was a dealbreaker, the OP wouldn't have posted the thread to begin with.
 
Posts
139
Likes
413
I understand completely. I simply assumed that if the date function (or absence thereof) was a dealbreaker, the OP wouldn't have posted the thread to begin with.
👍
 
Posts
236
Likes
289
I had a similar experience at the Rolex Boutique in Zurich and decided to never come back. They have their noses high in the sky. Maybe you become like that if clients creep at the floor or buy what they become and not what they want...
 
Posts
437
Likes
347
Thanks for your replies everyone, just for the record I'm not totally dismissing Rolex but if this is how they treat customers then I'd rather have no part in fuelling this kind of attitude with a purchase.

is this a forever watch or something youll wear for a while then move onto another? if its forever then get whatever you enjoy more. However if its something youll wear for a bit and then sell/trade to get another I'd get the Rolex as it will most likely have a better resell value

Oh right, I think I mentioned this somewhere before in the thread; but to clarify I want a forever watch (or at least long-term) that'll look great and fit in nearly everywhere I go and with whatever I do with it.

Reselling is not an issue as it hopefully won't be happening.

Having owned a couple Rolex watches and a couple Omega watches, I think I can fairly opine they are neck-and-neck in quality and achievement, although Rolex seems to do a better job "spinning" the marketing (e.g. inferring Hillary actually wore an Explorer to the top of Everest).

Personally I'm kinda done with the ridiculous Rolex hype. My only remaining watch is an Omega and I really love it.

Truth be told I was super happy with my Omega, it was perfect in most ways but I just wanted an upgrade really. Both Rolex & Omega are amazing quality but I think Omega is the best bang for buck atm. Yet theres something about Rolex that attracts people, could be marketing/flex or perhaps a real appreciation for their timepieces.

How important is the date for you?
I mean the date feature on the watch, not the date on which the watch becomes available.

The date function is probably the only complication that I would have on an everyday wearer. I see no reason in having a chronograph or etc clutter the dial despite not being used. Now you could argue that I don't NEED a timepiece either but that's a discussion for another thread.

I want a clean, simple and legible dial on a daily wearer with an excellent movement.
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
Thanks for your replies everyone, just for the record I'm not totally dismissing Rolex but if this is how they treat customers then I'd rather have no part in fuelling this kind of attitude with a purchase. ...snip...

Don't do business with an AD that disses you, nor blame Rolex entirely for an AD's behavior, just give your business to the one who treats you right.
 
Posts
47
Likes
23
Hi everyone!

I've recently been wanting to purchase a new daily wearing after having sold off my SM300. I was looking for a versatile timepiece that could be used in any situation without looking out of place.
Thus after some research and thinking I've come up with two timepieces, the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 39mm in white and the Aqua Terra 41mm in white. I can't seem to seriously decide over which would be better to have and thought others could lend their honest opinions about each of the watches?

Thank you for any and all opinions!

The Omega is more playful and fun with the pop of orange but for a more toned down look i think the Rolex is the way to go. Not to mention resale value wise if you were want to sell the value would be there in the Rolex.
 
Posts
334
Likes
1,706
There is something very special about a time-only Rolex. It is timeless and probably the most historically honest product the brand still offers today. I think that particular Omega could easily look dated in the future, where as the Rolex will not.
 
Posts
2,326
Likes
1,884
I think that particular Omega could easily look dated in the future, where as the Rolex will not.

That's because the Rolex already looks dated. Hasn't changed materially in the past 40 years in style.

Tom