Omega SM300 w/ Mesh Bracelet Built with Replacement Parts & Purchased on Chrono24

Posts
1,344
Likes
1,960
not quite. I know what the watch is: A watch assembled from replacement parts by a third party. Call it anything.... that’s it right?

and WatchCo was not a general term or a description but an actual manufacturer in Australia. Maybe your statement should be directed to someone else.

Watchco were certainly not a manufacturer, they were a service agent in Australia, that claimed to be closing and selling old stock(which they did,some amazing stuff) but it was liberally sprinkled with new service parts to keep you on your toes.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
This is buying parts from Omega, making watches with said parts, and selling them as brand new watches, which directly competes with Omega.

They issue parts accounts to watchmakers that meet the requirements so they can service and repair watches. Not build Omega watches from scratch to sell for a profit (again, competing with Omega).
Right, because it.is.not.omega

Anyway. I think we all have our opinions.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
Watchco were certainly not a manufacturer, they were a service agent in Australia, that claimed to be closing and selling old stock(which they did,some amazing stuff) but it was liberally sprinkled with new service parts to keep you on your toes.
WatchCo. Watch Company, was an authorized service center that created a side business and marketed as watchCo issued watches. The manufactured their own watches with spare parts from Omega and hijacked the brand name Omega to sell them.

Omega didn't t think that was a fair thing to do, and it was not.

Imagine if you own Omega, or any other brand, and someone takes your parts, makes a watch, says it's an Original Omega and sells it at a premium.....Before you know it other people may actually relate to the brand through WatchCo, for good or bad, and the brand will loose control over it's identity and quality controls. Sometimes the hijackers may make something great that actually elevated your brand, sometimes they may make something not so great that devaluates your brand. The actual output is irrelevant, it is the lack of control over it that will die a red flag with any brand.

THAT is what copyrights and trademarks are for; so people cannot just take your name and profit from it. If there where loopholes associated with authorized dealers and watchmakers they are being closed and will continue to be closed gradually.

I don't know why people get defensive about my argument. I am not saying a given watch may not be great, I am just saying it is not an OMEGA if it is not issued by Omega. It may be made with Omega parts, made with omega-like quality controls or superior...but the brand and its trademark and copy is not public domain. I may not know a lot about watches, but this last part I do know something about.
 
Posts
28,043
Likes
71,583
This is buying parts from Omega, making watches with said parts, and selling them as brand new watches, which directly competes with Omega.

Spot on - they do not want direct competition selling watches.

I am not saying a given watch may not be great, I am just saying it is not an OMEGA if it is not issued by Omega. It may be made with Omega parts, made with omega-like quality controls or superior...but the brand and its trademark and copy is not public domain. I may not know a lot about watches, but this last part I do know something about.

I get where you are coming from, but to say it's not an Omega is false. You seem to ignore the fact that Omega allows a watch to be converted this way. The only part of Watchco's business that was contrary to Omega's rules, was the part where they sold completed watches. If they had simply offered a service where you sent in a watch, and had it converted in the process of being serviced, it would all be above board.

The very fact that Omega condones the conversion of watches in this way, means that the final product is very much an Omega, whether you agree or not. The only difference is the circumstances of how it got to that state, and if it was being sold as an already completed product, or a customer's converted watch. The watch is an Omega either way, it's just a matter if you get in trouble doing the conversion or not.

Sorry, but you are off the mark here...and just FYI I've had many conversations with Omega about these watches, so this isn't just me stating an opinion, this is based on those conversations with Omega.
 
Posts
64
Likes
89
not quite. I know what the watch is: A watch assembled from replacement parts by a third party. Call it anything.... that’s it right?

and WatchCo was not a general term or a description but an actual manufacturer in Australia. Maybe your statement should be directed to someone else.
Not a manufacturer. Just an assembler
 
Posts
21,737
Likes
49,335
I don't know why people get defensive about my argument.

You think other people are getting defensive? 😗
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
Spot on - they do not want direct competition selling watches.



I get where you are coming from, but to say it's not an Omega is false. You seem to ignore the fact that Omega allows a watch to be converted this way. The only part of Watchco's business that was contrary to Omega's rules, was the part where they sold completed watches. If they had simply offered a service where you sent in a watch, and had it converted in the process of being serviced, it would all be above board.

The very fact that Omega condones the conversion of watches in this way, means that the final product is very much an Omega, whether you agree or not. The only difference is the circumstances of how it got to that state, and if it was being sold as an already completed product, or a customer's converted watch. The watch is an Omega either way, it's just a matter if you get in trouble doing the conversion or not.

Sorry, but you are off the mark here...and just FYI I've had many conversations with Omega about these watches, so this isn't just me stating an opinion, this is based on those conversations with Omega.


OK, I stand corrected then.

Beautiful watch at an amazing price. Enjoy it!!
 
Posts
77
Likes
43
I would like to weigh in if I may.
Archer has first hand experience from Omega, it's not his opinion he is conveying facts appertaining to this subject, as an authorised Omega repairer and conversation first hand from Omega S.A.

If all the parts are genuine Omega, then it is factually an Omega Seamaster 300 1660324...... It's not a 165024 or a 165024,which are original Omega Seamasters from the 1960's/70's.

A “Frankin” watch is a watch cobbled together by non authorised vendors with the intention of pretending to be something its not, a “Fake” is with the same intent, but using non Omega parts. Both are using incorrect or fake parts respectively with the intention to deceive.

The truth of the matter is a "Watch Co" watch is a non vintage omega 300 made with exactly the same parts (all from Omega) as the vintage Omega Seamaster 300., the exception being that the case is a 1660324 case instead of a vintage one made by Huguenin Freres ,Centrale Boites S.A., Piquerez ,etc, but still from Omega in its entirety.

I have a collection of 300's, some of them have had service parts, all from Omega, which I could remove and assemble a complete "Watch Co" style watch from. I have period vintage 300's with replacement 552 & 565 movements even one of my mili 300's has a replacement movement supplied from Goldsmith's to the MOD (all correct). They still are what they are. All are genuine Omegas in one form or another, just different because of their histories. I do have a few "Watch Co" watches . I use the one with a cal 561 in it.

At the end of the day I like the watches, and have done since I first saw my uncles Army one (which he kindly gave me when he retired) and my fathers one he used for diving, he had one of the first ones with a SD crown on advice from my uncle,(good advice), as I mentioned the history for me is part of the watch.

Everyone will have his or her own opinions and views on this subject. To some people a mint condition watch has no history, to others ageing from moisture is unsavoury and visa versa, we all collect for different reasons which is good as every watch has someone who will like it and get pleasure from it.

In Conclusion; 😀
My opinion is that it is important to not “close off” to facts, and Archers comments are factual and should form the base for this type of discussion, which should be based at least on facts.

It is not my intention to upset anyone; if I have I am sorry.
Edited:
 
Posts
129
Likes
391
I think the question should be where was that produced? China, Thailand, India?

To be fair to the shop and to clarify the matter to avoid misunderstanding, it has stated clearly that “the dial appears to have been refinished by hand”. The shop has no intention of creating a false impression.
 
Posts
77
Likes
43
To be fair to the shop and to clarify the matter to avoid misunderstanding, it has stated clearly that “the dial appears to have been refinished by hand”. The shop has no intention of creating a false impression.
I am affraid that the lettering, numbers,are very wrong.
When members are saying india etc they mean it. It has not been "re finished" its at best been stripped and totally repainted and more likely its a total fake. it has intentionally been put in an Omega packet (not correlating in any way with the style of the dial) with the intention to deceive.
Edited:
 
Posts
97
Likes
79
The only reason I would use the word franken, is because the movements in these were mostly not from a SM300 initially. They are often from some less desirable model, and were converted to the SM300 by Watchco. If someone was trying to sell a vintage Speedmaster that had a Seamaster movement in it, most people would consider that a franken - I don't see these any differently in that regard.

BTW this type of conversion is allowed by Omega, but only as a part of a servicing job - Omega doesn't allow people to produce Omegas and sell them - that is how you end up losing a parts account.

I may be misunderstanding, but are you saying that if I have an omega watch with the 565 movement, I could send it to Omega, or an approved qualified Omega watchmaker, and they would build a 166.0324 using the original movement?
 
Posts
28,043
Likes
71,583
I may be misunderstanding, but are you saying that if I have an omega watch with the 565 movement, I could send it to Omega, or an approved qualified Omega watchmaker, and they would build a 166.0324 using the original movement?

Yes. This is from the Omega Customer Service policy:

MODIFICATION OF OMEGA WATCHES

It is possible to modify an existing watch type if the result of the modified type will correspond EXACTLY to a watch type of the OMEGA Collection, however without changing the movement type. For limited or numbered series no modifications are allowed.
 
Posts
3,133
Likes
5,560
Fake = a watch made with counterfeit parts.
Franken = a watch made with genuine parts belonging to different models.
Assemblage = a watch made from compatible parts that started life in different watches.
I have to go now, I have another peacekeeping mission to deal with.
 
Posts
109
Likes
105
Hi Al,
I'm new here so I hope my question doesn't seem too naive; I would really love to try and build an SM300 with genuine new parts, is it possible that I could somehow purchase the same parts from Omega or would I need to go through some kind of intermediary or third party or other?
Kind regards
Stephen


The term "NOS" means "New Old Stock" and there's nothing old about these parts. These are brand new, recently manufacture service parts from Omega. The "NOS" crap all started with Watchco claiming they had all these "old" service cases, when all they were doing is buying brand new, recently manufactured, parts from Omega. These are not old, therefore are not NOS watches or parts.

With that out of the way, let's look at the case designs...here is a case that was manufactured in 2016 from what I recall on the package:



Note the shape of the cut out at the crown guards:



The "A" in waterproof is flat on top:



These are images I've just taken of a case I purchased right from Omega recently. This case was made in the 25th week of 2019, so just a few months ago. You can see the date code on the package:





Front shot:



Note the cut out is very different for the crown guards:



And the case back has a pointed "A" in waterproof:



Again, both of these cases were purchased directly from Omega, so there is no doubt regarding their authenticity. I do admit that last year when the photos of the different cut out for the crown guard were first posted, I was skeptical that it was an original Omega case, as there are fakes out there. But having ordered one right from Omega, I am satisfied this is now a change that the cases have gone through.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
28,043
Likes
71,583
SXP SXP
Hi Al,
I'm new here so I hope my question doesn't seem too naive; I would really love to try and build an SM300 with genuine new parts, is it possible that I could somehow purchase the same parts from Omega or would I need to go through some kind of intermediary or third party or other?
Kind regards
Stephen

Omega doesn't sell to private citizens, but only to certified watchmakers. Those watchmakers would risk losing their parts accounts if they sold the parts to you, so I wouldn't expect them to do that just to make a small sale on a few parts. You could get a watchmaker to do this conversion work for you though...
 
Posts
109
Likes
105
Hi, thank you, so would the conversion work mean that I could provide the donor and they could put it together?
.. sorry for sounding a bit naive again ..
 
Posts
28,043
Likes
71,583
SXP SXP
Hi, thank you, so would the conversion work mean that I could provide the donor and they could put it together?
.. sorry for sounding a bit naive again ..

Yes.
 
Posts
77
Likes
43
The term "NOS" means "New Old Stock" and there's nothing old about these parts. These are brand new, recently manufacture service parts from Omega. The "NOS" crap all started with Watchco claiming they had all these "old" service cases, when all they were doing is buying brand new, recently manufactured, parts from Omega. These are not old, therefore are not NOS watches or parts.

With that out of the way, let's look at the case designs...here is a case that was manufactured in 2016 from what I recall on the package:



Note the shape of the cut out at the crown guards:



The "A" in waterproof is flat on top:



These are images I've just taken of a case I purchased right from Omega recently. This case was made in the 25th week of 2019, so just a few months ago. You can see the date code on the package:





Front shot:



Note the cut out is very different for the crown guards:



And the case back has a pointed "A" in waterproof:



Again, both of these cases were purchased directly from Omega, so there is no doubt regarding their authenticity. I do admit that last year when the photos of the different cut out for the crown guard were first posted, I was skeptical that it was an original Omega case, as there are fakes out there. But having ordered one right from Omega, I am satisfied this is now a change that the cases have gone through.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
77
Likes
43
I do not own a latest incarnation of sm300.
Would you say the quality/ finish is inferior with the later/ recent watch cases and case backs?
thanks
Max
Edited: