simonsays
·No, “production error” or “mistake” will. Like so many brand production errors they become very valuable .... when made by the brand. Ask Rolex about that one.
No mistake, just a service replacement
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
No, “production error” or “mistake” will. Like so many brand production errors they become very valuable .... when made by the brand. Ask Rolex about that one.
Can you tell by serial number what the watch was supposed to be?
I think it is an opinion more prolific on this forum but not really correct. Omega just spent about £80,000 on a Seamaster with the incorrect movement. I bet ‘Franken’ won’t be in the Museam description 😲
An extract based on serial should tell you what the movement came in originally.
I’m really not sure why this debate comes up every year or so. If it is assembled with all factory parts, then it is all Omega, just not a factory assembled vintage SM300- this has been discussed ad nauseum. If you sent a beaten and damaged vintage SM300 back to Omega, this is what you would get back.
@Archer , curious as to what you would label this particular watch as. It is not Watchco but a different maker that builds the watch from
Parts and sells in chrono24.
Does Watchco have anything to differentiate them from this manufacturer? Is this a Franken? An Original? A fake?
I’m not loading this question, I’m just curious as to what other perspectives there are outside of mine ( already stated) and the buyers (also stated) and your experience does make your opinion very valuable.
Watchco is a description used for all these watches. Watchco made them popular by selling regularly on eBay about 10 years ago.
I think you have formed opinions without understanding what the watch is!
Omega Will service the watch and return it like any other Omega watch.
@Archer , curious as to what you would label this particular watch as. It is not Watchco but a different maker that builds the watch from
Parts and sells in chrono24.
Does Watchco have anything to differentiate them from this manufacturer? Is this a Franken? An Original? A fake?
I’m not loading this question, I’m just curious as to what other perspectives there are outside of mine ( already stated) and the buyers (also stated) and your experience does make your opinion very valuable.
From the web:
So whats a WatchCo Omega Seamaster 300?? Well imagine you found a surplus of Omega service parts, and you could essentially build a New Old Stock watch from those parts... That's exactly what a WatchCo Omega Seamaster 300 is! WatchCo was an Omega authorized service center in Australia. They aren't anymore but still have a supply of parts for omega watches including cases, bezels, dials, and hands. WatchCo is known for assembling 1960s style Seamaster 300s from a stock of genuine Omega service parts. The watches are marketed as “New Old Stock” using a vintage movement that is sourced to power the watch. The reference 165.024 has a specific feeling and look that centers it as one of the most desirable vintage Omega diving watches ever produced by the brand. The bi-directional ratcheting bezel, luminous bezel insert, the high visibility dial, and overall larger size for a watch of its time period allowing it to remain relevant to today's sizing trends while quite literally being new old stock. The WatchCo Seamaster 300's will pass pressure tests and can actually be used for diving if you wish. The price point compared to the vintage examples is also quite affordable for a watch that you can use as a daily driver suitable for pretty much anything you can throw at it... Not literally but figuratively speaking of course!
Also note the watches then have different production codes. For example OMSM300WC
The WC being an unfortunate choice to mark
a genuine watch of eq quality... but that’s just a funny coincidence.
and BTW, I personally like the OMSM300WC, I think it’s nice to have a heritage model without faux patina and closer to the original. And they used to be well priced.
I’m really not sure why this debate comes up every year or so. If it is assembled with all factory parts, then it is all Omega, just not a factory assembled vintage SM300- this has been discussed ad nauseum. If you sent a beaten and damaged vintage SM300 back to Omega, this is what you would get back.
Interesting. This is the source for why it’s worth:
https://www.craftandtailored.com/products/omega-seamaster-300-ref-165-24
if you google OMSM300WC it does lead to the watchco but maybe someone just made that up to try to legitimize the watch.
That is their stock number - has nothing to do with Omega.
Note that the advert there is misleading - they call it a 165.024, but the case is actually a 166.0324, which is the replacement spare part.
But, you would get it back from Omega? If I assemble the watch is it still a genuine Omega?
I understand and respect the opinion , I just don’t share it but maybe I’m just not getting something
I would say if you assembled it with all factory parts and a vintage movement, then yes, it is a “genuine Omega”, but not built by Omega. Any vintage piece can be cobbled from parts to make a whole (like an independent 30 years ago using a donor to repair a customers watch)- we see it all the time. It doesn’t make them any less Omega, just not as they left the factory.
To support your argument, if a factory service center were to build one of these, it would come with a factory warranty- which none of the 3rd party builders can claim.
why, as per Archer, you can’t just assemble new watches from spare parts and sell them as genuine new watches or you can loose your relationship with Omega.