Omega Seamaster 300 with genuine Omega Replacement parts (Watchco style)?

Posts
221
Likes
203
I just bought this watch and i posted pics on Watchuseek and it looks like the dial may be a fake and some people have raised doubts about the caseback. I was directed to this forum to get a second opinion as Seamaster 300s WatchCo style seem to be a minefield I am starting to realize. I was told the experts are on this forum 😀
From what i understand the issues with this watch is that the dial date window doesn't have a bezel (I could not find pictures of a genuine replacement Omega dial without the bevel. Also the caseback does not have a flat A in Waterproof and thta raised a few questions.
This is the original listing with better pics:
https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/...-type-166-024-warranty.5487713/#post-56505391

And this is the post on Watchuseek with the discussion:
https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/omega-seamaster-300-watchco.5493172/

Any help would be appreciated. I thought i knew enough because buying it but it looks like I still have a lot to learn.

 
Posts
2,439
Likes
5,011
This:

https://www.omegaseamaster300.com/

is one reference- guide.

Bezel seems OK, serifs on dial also, Date wheel??, case??

Difficult without loupe and UV-light.
(I don t open sites with cookies at their entrance)

Why don t you upload better pictures here? 😕
 
Posts
258
Likes
188
The watch is as described in the advert. It is a build from Omega service parts (so-called-watchco), dial and hand are relumed.
Only vintage part on the watch is the movement, which may be service, or taken form another watch.
The caseback is OK, I know about two iterations of original Omega service casebacks with sharp A.
 
Posts
221
Likes
203
The watch is as described in the advert. It is a build from Omega service parts (so-called-watchco), dial and hand are relumed.
Only vintage part on the watch is the movement, which may be service, or taken form another watch.
The caseback is OK, I know about two iterations of original Omega service casebacks with sharp A.
Yes it is supposed to be new parts, i know thta but it strongly looks like the dial, at least, is a fake.
 
Posts
5,423
Likes
9,264
What makes you think, that the Dial is a fake? Let us know. Keep in mind, that the so called Watchco was in the early 2000. Omega manufactured parts all the time. If you buy a Sea 300 these days, the original Omega service parts may look different now. For example: case back stamping from flat A back to pointed A in the last batch. The watchuseek discussion guys are not up to date at all ....
 
Posts
221
Likes
203
What makes you think, that the Dial is a fake? Let us know. Keep in mind, that the so called Watchco was in the early 2000. Omega manufactured parts all the time. If you buy a Sea 300 these days, the original Omega service parts may look different now. For example: case back stamping from flat A back to pointed A in the last batch. The watchuseek discussion guys are not up to date at all ....
The date window is the issue that was raised. I checked all the original replacement dials i coukd find online and they all have the beveled window. Also when i took the close up picture i realized that the window is off centered in the white frame and one corner is not straight. That is not up to par with Omega standards. The only dials i coukd find with the non bevel date window are the reproduction dials on Etsy, and guess what, the window is also off centered on those dials.
 
Posts
2,541
Likes
3,401
If that is a service dial, it has been relumed as well, because it should be bright white with a slight green tinge from the lume, not tan. A lot of fake dial have been made with fauxtina, so I am dubious that is a real dial and handset that has been relumed, even though that is what the seller claims.

Frankly, if I was buying one of these put-together Seamaster 300s, I would want all the service parts to have the modern lume, and not a mixture of new and re-lumed. Based on the lume pictures from the sale post, if it is re-lumed, it's not very good in terms of brightness in the dark. And the hands/dial brightness don't match.