Davidt
·That is terrible
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Should have expanded more on my previous post I guess. If we were to apply the cars analogy there are a lot of recorded examples with cars built at a later stage from NOS or even reproductions parts that have been allowed to race in historic events following approval from the governing body.
Indeed they might not be worth the same in an auction but they are recognised as “originals” and hence they have a value. This is also reflected in the watchco to vintage comparison, the vintage 300s command higher prices than watchcos...
Reading between the lines I think Noble is saying that the watchco style sm300 is not an ‘authentic’ Omega. It is only worth the sum of its parts.
I can’t disagree but still think it has its place and is a fun watch.
so.... for 1 or 2 g’s max.... maybe. It does not actually cost more than a few hundred to make.
Informations on the dial
https://vintagewatchspecialist.com/...a-big-triangle-dial-date-aperture-part-98-562
Exactly and agreed with you.
Sorry, but if you think the parts for a complete watch can be obtained for "a few hundred" then you are mistaken.
If you see the point in these or not is up to you, but they are popular. They are not fakes if made with genuine parts. Franken yes, but not fakes.
So just to play with you what if you send your ‘watchco’ to Omega for service?
They rebuild the watch completely at Omega. Does this make it an Omega now in your eyes?
Personally I think collectors are all different and what matters to one is not so important to others. Condition, originality, age appropriateness of replaced parts. All have different levels of priority and no one can definitively say one way is right and another is wrong.
This non-collector has a "real" WatchCo and prefers it to the original.
as for the cost of parts etc you certainly know much better than me so I’ll stand corrected, but I do know of automatic watches than can are made for a couple of hundred and sold for much more. This I know from the actual brands themselves but, of course, they are not omega and they buy wholesale. I’m assuming the maker of this watch does too based on their sales volume but. True, I don’t know their actual cost.
I think you cannot call it anything other than an Omega. The only difference is the timing and distributor of the parts being made into a SM300. Same watch, same quality, same, same, same!(as an original watch that needed service parts)
I don’t even think the definition of Franken is correct. That for me should be applied to a watch made up of parts incorrect for the model to make something unseen in regular production.
I do t get it. Wherever the parts are from if it’s not made by Omega it’s a franken, a fake.
Can you tell by serial number what the watch was supposed to be?
Please forgive this personal question, but I have wondered this for a while, so perhaps you can indulge my curiosity. Are you an actual Nobel laureate, or a fake?
The only reason I would use the word franken, is because the movements in these were mostly not from a SM300 initially. They are often from some less desirable model, and were converted to the SM300 by Watchco. If someone was trying to sell a vintage Speedmaster that had a Seamaster movement in it, most people would consider that a franken - I don't see these any differently in that regard.
😲
I think it is an opinion more prolific on this forum but not really correct. Omega just spent about £80,000 on a Seamaster with the incorrect movement. I bet ‘Franken’ won’t be in the Museam description 😲