Omega Seamaster 300 Review

Posts
61
Likes
11
The one pictured is a vintage Isofrane Ashley, hard to find now and stupidly expensinve, but imho well worth looking for. The modern isofrane straps are good tho, but not quite as good as the original.. aint that always the way 馃檨
 
Posts
30,957
Likes
36,368
The one pictured is a vintage Isofrane Ashley, hard to find now and stupidly expensinve, but imho well worth looking for. The modern isofrane straps are good tho, but not quite as good as the original.. aint that always the way 馃檨
Ahk I'd read that, but always had this image of vintage rubber being brittle and fragile compared to modern stuff.
 
Posts
61
Likes
11
Well depends on how its been looked after and what solvents have been used on it, but mainly ive seen nice condition vintage isofranes.

This info might help a little...DeskDivers Isofrane information
 
Posts
2
Likes
4
Hi all, I was just surfing around the net looking at Omega SM 300 watches and came across this Review. Great write up, Ash .... thanks. Always good to look at watches.

Here are my SM 300's. The vintage is a 1966 and the watchco has a heart of a 1968 dated 565 movement. I have the original bracelet for the '66 and an Omega mesh for the '68 but don't use them. I prefer Nato's (at present).

I am toying with the idea of replacing the watchco date dial with the no date version (as I prefer no date's). However I'm unsure it will fit with the 565. I'll have to research more.....

Sorry for the poor quality pics. I am looking for a good camera for close up work.... anyone have a suggestion please pm me.

 
Posts
30,957
Likes
36,368
Hi all, I was just surfing around the net looking at Omega SM 300 watches and came across this Review. Great write up, Ash .... thanks. Always good to look at watches.

Here are my SM 300's. The vintage is a 1966 and the watchco has a heart of a 1968 dated 565 movement. I have the original bracelet for the '66 and an Omega mesh for the '68 but don't use them. I prefer Nato's (at present).

I am toying with the idea of replacing the watchco date dial with the no date version (as I prefer no date's). However I'm unsure it will fit with the 565. I'll have to research more.....

Sorry for the poor quality pics. I am looking for a good camera for close up work.... anyone have a suggestion please pm me.

Oh Hi! nice pair, do you have any other Omegas?
 
Posts
2
Likes
4
Oh Hi! nice pair, do you have any other Omegas?

Hi, yes I have a few different types of Omega's. Here's a couple of group pic's.

 
Posts
2,187
Likes
2,616
Hi, yes I have a few different types of Omega's. Here's a couple of group pic's.

Great collection, Oz-bear. Welcome to 惟F. Nice to see another local.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,647
Hi oz-bear. Nice group. Love that 166.0062!

I am looking for a good camera for close up work.... anyone have a suggestion please pm me.

Take a look at the Canon G series. 馃憤
 
Posts
6
Likes
18
Ok,...never been on any forums before but enjoyed this find and may be late on this thread, I can add to issue of "stiff crown" on Seamaster 1660324. I assembled my own a year ago,........from parts acculated from various sources. Trickiest was finding NOS stem for cal 565 and then cutting it to proper length so that it was not too long when crown is srewed down and not too short to allow date change action . ( next tricky part is setting on hands but thats another story.) My crown is very stiff, thought I had things misaligned and was stressing the stem but even after fine tuning it remains stiff. I thought maybe a "split stem" configuration was meant for, but I don't think that would improve it. I believe that Omega just makes the rubber crown seal especially tight on these new cases. Here's some pics of the project. My stiff crown does not bother me much as watch is accurate that I only adjust it when month has only 30 days.


While I am at it,.......here's pic of the cal 500 from my 57 Seamaster 18k that was in a safety deposit box for 50 years. ( I held my breath when opening the caseback the first time.


I hope to find time to participate more often
 
Posts
30,957
Likes
36,368
Very nice! What's the 18K one above?
 
Posts
30,957
Likes
36,368
Acually here's pic of 57 seamaster beside restored 1952 model
Its incredible how much that gold one looks like the current Aqua Terra
 
Posts
16,770
Likes
35,147
Great review and great pics馃憤

It was enough to tip me over when I saw one in the flesh.

And now..........

This one

IMG_0051.jpg

joins the gang

IMG_0053.jpg
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,025
Nice gang, looks like they could take on anything.馃榿
 
Posts
30,957
Likes
36,368
Nice gang, looks like they could take on anything.馃榿
Even a Rolex? 馃槻
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,025
Even a Rolex? 馃槻
Throw in a Pre-moon Speedy and they will mop the floor with it.馃榿
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,647
Throw in a Pre-moon Speedy and they will mop the floor with it.馃榿

Because a Rolex against a pre-Professional wouldn't be a fair fight. 馃槣
 
Posts
61
Likes
11
nicomega... I may have an answer to your problem... you may well have the wrong case for the movement. The SM300 comes in date and non-date versions, and the difference is the date... yeah, really.... bear with me. The reason is the datewheel means the date version needs to be different height for the crown so you need to set the crystal at a different height, and cos of that it is different. you can convert a date to non date (and vice versa) by changing the crystal, and i believe the rest remains the same. This will fix your issue I am sure.
 
Posts
30,957
Likes
36,368
I actually ended up selling the SM300 to fund the Seamaster Pie-Pan dress watch, much as I loved it, the 1680 Submariner got most of the wrist time.