Omega mk 40 on eBay. Is this genuine or should I report it?

Posts
661
Likes
2,029
I am watching this sale for a mont now and I am on the edge of buying it. Do you think is ok?
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,706
It looks like someone let a seven-year old with a box of crayons and a bad sense of colour coordination run the design team, so yes, it is probably a correct mk 40.
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
Judging by the bad pics, it's hard to tell.
Edited:
 
Posts
453
Likes
603
Eye of the beholder... I love that dial and color combo myself.
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
Please take a look and tell me ... the price is too good to be true . The problem is that the seller does not respond in any of my messages... I don’t know exactly what’s going on :-(

Dead Link/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/254263581734
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
Do you have a link to this ebay auction?
Hee you are my friend:
Dead Link/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/254263581734
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
Eye of the beholder... I love that dial and color combo myself.
I love it , too!
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
It looks like someone let a seven-year old with a box of crayons and a bad sense of colour coordination run the design team, so yes, it is probably a correct mk 40.
Thank you my friend . I see your point, however I love this dial
 
Posts
9,596
Likes
27,706
Thank you my friend . I see your point, however I love this dial

And that's what counts 👍

I recently took a chance with a 1-feedback seller (from Russia..!) and was pleasantly surprised, but normally I'd advise against it. You should definitely wait for communication from him.

Good luck!
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
Hee you are my friend:
Dead Link/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/254263581734

I wouldn't pay 1.500 Euro for anything to a seller, who has "1" = "one" ebay feedback.
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
What do you all also think about the mistake in the reference number ? Is it on purpose? Could he do it two times ? One in the title and one in the description? That’s another thing that also I find strange.
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
The reference is 3520.53 and not 63 as he writes two times
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
What do you all also think about the mistake in the reference number ? Is it on purpose? Could he do it two times ? One in the title and one in the description? That’s another thing that also I find strange.

Make your life a little bit more comfortable or more worth living for, while forgetting about questions, that aren't necessarily to be posed.
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
Make your life a little bit more comfortable or more worth living for, while forgetting about questions, that aren't necessarily to be posed.
That was a little hard on me my friend, but I can accept the irony
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
That was a little hard on me my friend, but I can accept the irony

I do apologize for any wrong posted word.

There was no intended irony in what I said.

What I basically meant was, that there are a lot of superflous questions here sometimes.

Sorry once again, if I did post something stupid. I didn't mean to do so.
 
Posts
661
Likes
2,029
I do apologize for any wrong posted word.

There was no intended irony in what I said.

What I basically meant was, that there are a lot of superflous questions here sometimes.

Sorry once again, if I did post something stupid. I didn't mean to do so.
No problem. apology accepted.
Anyways you don’t have to reply if there is a question that you find stupid. For me there are no stupid questions. Stupid is not to ask.
 
Posts
2,086
Likes
2,897
No problem. apology accepted.
Anyways you don’t have to reply if there is a question that you find stupid. For me there are no stupid questions. Stupid is not to ask.

Fully agree and you maybe did get me wrong.

Emails and internet are fine, but sometimes one and two would have better talked for 2 minutes.