Omega Holy Grail ref. 3760822 hands set

Posts
461
Likes
353
Maybe now the museum and the Moonwatch only team will get round to apologising to Andy at cal 1040 who did fantastic research in disproving the production numbers quoted in Moonwatch for the Speedmaster 125...they have been ignoring him for long enough

Their 2000 unnumbered limited edition quote is completely wrong as Andy so eloquently proves ...maybe the Omega records aren鈥檛 as accurate as they claim ?

And after that they can correct the production numbers for the caliber 1510 1511 1516 which are also wrong
 
Posts
4,114
Likes
16,308
As I said earlier, foisting incorrect information
can cause serious damage to other collectors.
I hope no one changed their bezel to the wrong one.
You damaged the value of my watch and anyone
else that has a b4 bezel on their Grail, until this
Moonwatch Only information surfaced, and I
don't appreciate it.

However I would have preferred to see collaboration of different people researching on the same topic instead of a cross-fire, I still believe that we are all grown ups and have to do our own homework before affirming something based on what whoever said or wrote.

RIP Marco Richon did a tremendous work and heavily contributed to Omega's heritage with his work, work which has been demonstrated partially incorrect by further research years later, based on new aggregated information. Nobody can be sure the the state of the knowledge on this particular topic as per today, won't change in the future.

I want simply to say THANK YOU to all the guys who spend from their precious time to research and who share the results of their research with the community, free of charge.

On us to ponder what we are going to affirm or how we're going to act after reading any information on the web or in the books.
 
Posts
461
Likes
353
Excellent observation Kov and just to show willing I posted a comment on the Moonwatch site ..doubt they will reproduce it ...I even reached out to them during my research but they didn鈥檛 bother to respond
And just to help them out they claim they never saw a post Feb 1988 watch with the B2 bezel HERE IS ONE PRODUCED IN MAY 1988 WITH THE EXTRACT .....I have 2 more one in September sent to Singapore right at the end of the 1988 production in September and one that went to Sweden in April 1988. Both have B2 bezels now according to the records and the French researchers this isn鈥檛 supposed to happen
 
Posts
1,819
Likes
5,911
Maybe now the museum and the Moonwatch only team will get round to apologising to Andy at cal 1040 who did fantastic research in disproving the production numbers quoted in Moonwatch for the Speedmaster 125...they have been ignoring him for long enough

Their 2000 unnumbered limited edition quote is completely wrong as Andy so eloquently proves ...maybe the Omega records aren鈥檛 as accurate as they claim ?

And after that they can correct the production numbers for the caliber 1510 1511 1516 which are also wrong

I would just like to state for the record that nobody owes me an apology, certainly not Omega, the museum team, or the authors of MWO. I deeply admire and appreciate their work.

I seek no apologies or even recognition; I just like learning about watches and history. I am happy to share what I see and am delighted if just one other collector out there finds it at all interesting.馃榾

Now I will just dip on out of this thread because I don鈥檛 have any knowledge to add on the Chuck Maddox Grail beyond what l鈥檝e read from Chuck鈥檚 site, @TsoloT 鈥榮 site, and now the MWO site.
 
Posts
4,229
Likes
9,247
Hi Everyone....

It just reminds us that we all Publish in this hobby for the love of the hobby... This is not a job but a labor of love....

But it saddens me when I see that people that are working on this can not meet on common ground....

For the " new kids" on the block in this hobby.... I am an "old timer" in this hobby ... I worked on many a project with Chuck Maddox.. We were close friends for many years and we talked daily for hours at a time on this hobby and Macintosh computers and the such.,...

He would have the same response as myself .....


I hope this is just a blip and not the new normal in this hobby..

Good Hunting

Bill Sohne
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
kov kov
However I would have preferred to see collaboration of different people researching on the same topic instead of a cross-fire, I still believe that we are all grown ups and have to do our own homework before affirming something based on what whoever said or wrote.

RIP Marco Richon did a tremendous work and heavily contributed to Omega's heritage with his work, work which has been demonstrated partially incorrect by further research years later, based on new aggregated information. Nobody can be sure the the state of the knowledge on this particular topic as per today, won't change in the future.

I want simply to say THANK YOU to all the guys who spend from their precious time to research and who share the results of their research with the community, free of charge.

On us to ponder what we are going to affirm or how we're going to act after reading any information on the web or in the books.

I would have much preferred the same.
I have been a contributing member here since the 1st year of OF.
I have tried to help many members here that sought my help vetting purchases.
I try to avoid trolls and petty arguments like the plague.
I acknowledged that I appreciated this man's passion for the Grail and the work
he put in on his website in an attempt to keep the conversation on a gentleman's level.
Because I challenged his conclusions, I was called a 'terrorist', told I had a
'non-authentic watch', etc. He claimed the Omega museum had incorrect watches,
Moon Watch Only had incorrect pictures and had done 'simplistic' research, etc.
As you infer, watch collecting should be approached with an open mind.
Setting yourself up as The authority on the "correct", "authentic" watch is narcissism.
 
Posts
4,114
Likes
16,308
@pitpro I understand that I lack some history to make any judgements on this case, therefore I can only agree with all you wrote above. I am not questioning your honesty or implication in this forum, I've simply reacted to your post and shared my feeling about this "Holy Grail fight" and us taking position in that. As often, when people disagree on something, the anger does not come from the substance but the way the argumentation happens...
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
Interesting piece of research ......Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.......it is conceded by the writers that they have never seen a post Feb 1988 watch with a b2 bezel and according to them there are as many b2 as b4 ....in fact there are 3 Watches I know of that have B2 bezels after Feb 1988 and I am sure there are members of the forum who know of more and any analysis of all the available images show there are at least 70 % of them with B2 bezels ...

So sorry that the value of your watch has been damaged next time get one with a b2 to be sure

'Imitation'? More narcissism from you.
You conveniently misrepresent what they stated.
These are serious men with scientific backgrounds, using scientific methods in their research.
For the record, here are their quotes:
"...one can clearly see that models produced in 1987 and up to 9 February 1988 have the type B2 bezel, whereas all models produced at a later date have a type B4 bezel. It is likely that some late Holy Grails have had their bezel replaced with a B2 unfortunately, but at this point, we have not observed any exception to this."
"Collectors must be extremely cautious when they look for information on the web. Incorrect information could lead them to conclude that their model is in a wrong configuration, and to change some components. This would be catastrophic if an original component stated as wrong / service, would be replaced"

A quote from you:
"One of the most unreliable thing(sp?) to do when collecting watches is in my humble opinion is to be dogmatic ,"

Your conclusions are rubbish.
So let's boil this all down, according to You;

at least 2 different bracelets possibly correct
at least 2 different endlinks possibly correct
2 different lume lengths in the correct hand length handsets observed.

-but Definitely only 1 bezel, b2, Definitely. Ignore the '28% of my observations that have b4'.

You and the community would be better served by defining the observed population of Grail variations avoiding
your arbitrary opinion of the 'the correct authentic watch'
Edited:
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
any analysis of all the available images show there are at least 70 % of them with B2 bezels ...
@speedy4ever
Delivery dates range in MWO: 3/1987-11/1988 21 months
According to MWO Grails delivered after 2/9/1988 have b4 bezel.
Last delivery date in MWO table 7/18/1988
So, 5 months of post 2/9/1988 delivery.
9/21 = 42.8% should have b4 bezels
Both sources numbers seem to agree.
You know what they say about coincidences....
edit馃檨:corrected from 7/1988 last delivery to 11/1988)
BTW, FYI, there is updated info on the Steel and Gold Limited to 200 Italian delivery Grail
Now on MWO supplement site.

http://www.moonwatchonly.com/omega-...eviews/omega-speedmaster-holy-grail/#comments
Edited:
 
Posts
640
Likes
793
Well to be more precise, last delivery was 22 November 1988 (not July) as detailed in the text and the table, which corresponds to 9 months. But this method would be accurate only if production was regular and linear during the 21 months of production.

We, the pair of "researchers", have more detailed figures:

- about 1100 were delivered before 19 February 1988 (date of the first observed B4 bezel)
- 200 are steel and gold with another type of bezel, all probably after February 1988

This means that there should be approximately 2000 - 1100 - 200 = about 700 with B4 bezel, meaning approx. 39% of the 1800 steel HG production.

Keep in mind that the aim of our bezel table with delivery date was not to fix a undisputed date for the bezel change, the idea was to prove that the B4 bezel cannot be just a service bezel, but was really originally fitted:

- 0 out of 20 with B4 observed until Feb.1988
- 21 out of 21with B4 observed from Feb.1988

Such a distinction cannot be explained by service.

Some claim there were B2 bezels on models produced AFTER Feb.1988. This is not impossible, you all know that a new part change rarely happens in one shot. On the other hand the claimed B2 post-Feb model is dated 26 May 1988, exactly the same date as that of 2 of our friends from the forum...with B4 bezel.

The more observations we get, the more accurate will be the results.



 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
Well to be more precise, last delivery was 22 November 1988 (not July) as detailed in the text and the table, which corresponds to 9 months. But this method would be accurate only if production was regular and linear during the 21 months of production.

We, the pair of "researchers", have more detailed figures:

- about 1100 were delivered before 19 February 1988 (date of the first observed B4 bezel)
- 200 are steel and gold with another type of bezel, all probably after February 1988

This means that there should be approximately 2000 - 1100 - 200 = about 700 with B4 bezel, meaning approx. 39% of the 1800 steel HG production.

Keep in mind that the aim of our bezel table with delivery date was not to fix a undisputed date for the bezel change, the idea was to prove that the B4 bezel cannot be just a service bezel, but was really originally fitted:

- 0 out of 20 with B4 observed until Feb.1988
- 21 out of 21with B4 observed from Feb.1988

Such a distinction cannot be explained by service.

Some claim there were B2 bezels on models produced AFTER Feb.1988. This is not impossible, you all know that a new part change rarely happens in one shot. On the other hand the claimed B2 post-Feb model is dated 26 May 1988, exactly the same date as that of 2 of our friends from the forum...with B4 bezel.

The more observations we get, the more accurate will be the results.
Thanks for the great information guys!!!
It just gets better.
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
Well to be more precise, last delivery was 22 November 1988 (not July) as detailed in the text and the table, which corresponds to 9 months. But this method would be accurate only if production was regular and linear during the 21 months of production.

We, the pair of "researchers", have more detailed figures:

- about 1100 were delivered before 19 February 1988 (date of the first observed B4 bezel)
- 200 are steel and gold with another type of bezel, all probably after February 1988

This means that there should be approximately 2000 - 1100 - 200 = about 700 with B4 bezel, meaning approx. 39% of the 1800 steel HG production.

Keep in mind that the aim of our bezel table with delivery date was not to fix a undisputed date for the bezel change, the idea was to prove that the B4 bezel cannot be just a service bezel, but was really originally fitted:

- 0 out of 20 with B4 observed until Feb.1988
- 21 out of 21with B4 observed from Feb.1988

Such a distinction cannot be explained by service.

Some claim there were B2 bezels on models produced AFTER Feb.1988. This is not impossible, you all know that a new part change rarely happens in one shot. On the other hand the claimed B2 post-Feb model is dated 26 May 1988, exactly the same date as that of 2 of our friends from the forum...with B4 bezel.

The more observations we get, the more accurate will be the results.
I am new to this but have been an observer on many sites before forum and I am long time collector and have owned and still own a grail or two and have friends who have few as well and we are all wondering based on the following

I read your blog and also the blog by TsoloT and he makes a number of interesting points


The first one is how come a number of your b2 watches are right at the end of production

Did they make the b2 then go b4 then at the end with the 48 233 8xx and 48 233 9 xx go back to the b2 again


The other is how did you get photos of the watches and surely these are not photos when watches leave the factory

and we have all seen lots of b4 bezels but mostly with service hands ...until recently all the watches on chrono 24 were this configuration but no one has seen a b2 with a service hand set couldn't find one on the net either

And finally where is the production sheet for this bezel change ?

And why if there were only 39% b4 why does your table show a 50% 50% split with some post 1988 watches in the first batch
Thanks for the space to ask these questions but as helpful as your research is its caused a few people to ask more questions than have been answered which suppose is a good thing
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
S SPRITE
I am new to this but have been an observer on many sites before forum and I am long time collector and have owned and still own a grail or two and have friends who have few as well and we are all wondering based on the following

I read your blog and also the blog by TsoloT and he makes a number of interesting points


The first one is how come a number of your b2 watches are right at the end of production

Did they make the b2 then go b4 then at the end with the 48 233 8xx and 48 233 9 xx go back to the b2 again


The other is how did you get photos of the watches and surely these are not photos when watches leave the factory

and we have all seen lots of b4 bezels but mostly with service hands ...until recently all the watches on chrono 24 were this configuration but no one has seen a b2 with a service hand set couldn't find one on the net either

And finally where is the production sheet for this bezel change ?

And why if there were only 39% b4 why does your table show a 50% 50% split with some post 1988 watches in the first batch
Thanks for the space to ask these questions but as helpful as your research is its caused a few people to ask more questions than have been answered which suppose is a good thing


Just to be totally transparent I did email TsoloT on his site at [email protected] for clarification on his blog and he suggested that I do a search on the net and check images and then contact the authors directly but if not then join the forum and ask the members as he advised me that the forum had some incredibly knowledgeable members with the same 40 years or more experience as he had ( I am quoting directly)
 
Posts
640
Likes
793
Is t_solo_t back?

Anyway I will answer your questions:

S SPRITE
I am new to this but have been an observer on many sites before forum and I am long time collector and have owned and still own a grail or two and have friends who have few as well and we are all wondering based on the following
You still own a grail or 2? Seriously you don't know how many you own? Then you could make research progress by indicating us their details, no?

S SPRITE
I read your blog and also the blog by TsoloT and he makes a number of interesting points


The first one is how come a number of your b2 watches are right at the end of production

Did they make the b2 then go b4 then at the end with the 48 233 8xx and 48 233 9 xx go back to the b2 again

No, as it is WELL KNOWN among long time collectors, production is not correlated to s/n. E.g. 48.231.000, the smallest s/n and 48.233.999, the highest s/n were produced exactly at the same date in October 1987.
Same observations for example for the 1000x ST 345.0808 in 48.169.xxx


S SPRITE
The other is how did you get photos of the watches and surely these are not photos when watches leave the factory
these photos are of course not from 1987-88, but who can pretend to have numerous photos of the watches when they left factory? You may be?

S SPRITE
and we have all seen lots of b4 bezels but mostly with service hands ...until recently all the watches on chrono 24 were this configuration but no one has seen a b2 with a service hand set couldn't find one on the net either
We? Who we? funny because of the 8 HG-B4 for which we have pictures available right now (the other were observed directly at Omega), 7 out 8 have original tritium hands. Conversely, Antiquorum sold one (48.233.834) with service dial and hands, but still the B2 bezel, meaning that OMEGA did not automatically changed the bezel. One more argument that B4 is not service. The other being that B4 was replace by B5 in the mid 90s. This is very astonishing to have such a high number of B4 today, but not so many B5.


S SPRITE
And why if there were only 39% b4 why does your table show a 50% 50% split with some post 1988 watches in the first batch
simply because this is a sample of 41 observed watches. There is no post Feb.1988 in the first batch.
If B4 was just a replacement by OMEGA, WHY so many watches after Feb 88 were serviced and why none before Feb.88 were serviced and replaced with B4?
Edited:
 
Posts
640
Likes
793
As a conclusion to this thread, the following arguments are in favour of the B4 bezel originally installed on the (late) HGs:
- so far no B4 observed on HGs produced before Feb.88, while all B4 observed from Feb.88
- OMEGA did not systematically replace the bezel during service
- Assuming that the first serviced HGs were probably not before early-mid 90s and that B4 was replaced in the mid-90s by B5, why so many B4 and so few B5?

Therefore we, Greg and Anthony, are convinced that the HG was delivered new with 2 types of bezel and our take-home message is: do not replace your B4 bezel with a B2.

Some collectors do not agree with this conclusion and accuse us of plagiarism, but we can certain live with that level of intolerance, given that we have many other projects planned an no time for this kind of childishness.

Now dear collectors make your opinion and don't forget that we live in an open world, which should leave space to uncertainties and tolerance.
All the best,
Greg & Anthony
 
Posts
30,490
Likes
36,090
Is t_solo_t back?

Not any more he isn't, cute pretending to be another person who has read his blog though.
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
S SPRITE
...but no one has seen a b2 with a service hand set couldn't find one on the net either

Really Stuart? Let me help. How about these from your Instagram feed last year.
These are yours at the time, no?
You are making a fool of yourself now and discrediting anything you say
...what a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive
August 21,2017(far right)
https://www.instagram.com/p/BYDdU75nhn3/?hl=en&taken-by=t_solo_t


October 4, 2017
https://www.instagram.com/p/BZ1E-7mnGAt/?hl=en&taken-by=t_solo_t
Edited:
 
Posts
3,084
Likes
3,574
If anyone doubts this who was trolling here today-
This is what would be called a Unique text style, being that it is incorrect punctuation.
He always uses a question mark with a space before, as SPRITE did today. Oops! 馃槵
v

And finally where is the production sheet for this bezel change ?


.maybe the Omega records aren鈥檛 as accurate as they claim ?

So apart from that Mrs Lincoln how did you enjoy the play ?

...repeated where did the other 300 come from ?....
...watch photos on the net ?
...Where is your bench mark reference watch ?
Edited:
 
Posts
19
Likes
7
Excellent observation Kov and just to show willing I posted a comment on the Moonwatch site ..doubt they will reproduce it ...I even reached out to them during my research but they didn鈥檛 bother to respond
And just to help them out they claim they never saw a post Feb 1988 watch with the B2 bezel HERE IS ONE PRODUCED IN MAY 1988 WITH THE EXTRACT .....I have 2 more one in September sent to Singapore right at the end of the 1988 production in September and one that went to Sweden in April 1988. Both have B2 bezels now according to the records and the French researchers this isn鈥檛 supposed to happen

I am buying a very expensive watch from Exotic Watch Spain. I am discovering your post. I do not know very well how to be in touch with you. Can you give me more information?