repoman
路sorry but I did not understand well; the clock on the right was owned by Omega or a collector?
do you remember the name of the person who exhibited the Omega on the right?
sorry but I did not understand well; the clock on the right was owned by Omega or a collector?
do you remember the name of the person who exhibited the Omega on the right?
I have no skin in the game, and frankly, don't care, but feel that @dennisthemenace very valid point was overlooked.
The issue with this is, that as @dennisthemenace says:
So when the person requesting the extract from the archive, was able to provide information which they wanted added... and we have seen this before with watches that are incorrect, but have an extract from pre 2010... the extract is essentially worthless.
I have no skin in the game, and frankly, don't care, but feel that @dennisthemenace very valid point was overlooked.
The watch on the right is owned by Omega, it is part of their museum collection.
Jean-Claude Monachan
Not by me...馃榾
I also have no skin in this particular game, but if I was and was considering a purchase the first thing I would do is get a new extract...
I am speechless ...
the most anomalous Apollo-Soyuz in the world and clearly different from all the other Omega-Apollo Soyuz belongs to the Vice President Omega?
it's a joke!
do you remember the 1992 film "A Few Good Men"?
... when Tom Cruise asks Jack Nicholson if he was the one to "order the red code"?
the assassination of President Kennedy is nothing compared to the unresolved case of the Apollo-Soyuz clocks ... excuse me but I try to laugh at it
it鈥檚 a regular late 70s watch with a service bezel and a Soyuz Dial
But it's a totally different dial, can't you see that?
I have seen this watch it is currently in the museum in the Omega boutique in Vienna
The back is the standard inscription on all the 145.022 ...it is not a Soyuz ...it鈥檚 a regular late 70s watch with a service bezel and a Soyuz Dial on a leather strap as indicated in the picture ...not sure it鈥檚 meant to be a Soyuz although the description indicates it is
Maybe they just haven't managed to snag a decent one yet. They're not the easiest reference to find.
sorry, but the dial is not Apollo-Soyuz has obviously been customized (in bad way) to become it, why show the public a fake so obvious?
Again, it's just a demo sample for boutique events where 99,9% of the people don't even know the difference between tritium and luminova (and that is normal). Where's the problem here?
At the boutique events I鈥檝e been to, most people seem to only really care whether their champagne is kept topped up... the watches are by-the-by. 馃槜
in my opinion not everyone thinks of Champagne but in this case I do not understand why exposing a watch that is a son of anyone.
this is not an A-S watch!
If inside this clock there was a movement between 39.180.xxx and 39.181.xxx it could be the living proof that not only ASs exist with out-of-range movements but there are also watch AS with correct movements but everything else counterfeit , and in this case it is Omega herself who shows it to everyone.
... it is very likely that if someone in Omega, reading these considerations, wanted to invent any logical explanation NOW we could also believe it but the problem would remain:
Given that Omega has been asked several times by individuals, collectors and fans around the world and all asked for an explanation about the anomalous Apollo-Soyuz watches.
If this is the premise, why would Omega have ever had to expose this monster to his events and above all why insert it carefully together with those watches considered among the rarest in the world?
right, because everyone thinks about champagne...
maybe because I was not at the Los Angeles event that I do not think that's