snunez
·G'Day all,
I ran across an old (by my guess, probably 1950's or earlier) watch, that has an unusual sub-seconds. I have spent most of the day trying to find another example of such a numbered sub-seconds, and found none. In addition, the sub-second hand seem different than others I have seen, being more dauphine in shape than the thin second hand I normally see on sub-seconds.
Also, the back is a bit unusual:
I can barely tell a bad redial on a 1960's model, and the earlier models are still a mystery. There is something here that does not 'feel' right. What do the wiser members here think?
I ran across an old (by my guess, probably 1950's or earlier) watch, that has an unusual sub-seconds. I have spent most of the day trying to find another example of such a numbered sub-seconds, and found none. In addition, the sub-second hand seem different than others I have seen, being more dauphine in shape than the thin second hand I normally see on sub-seconds.
Also, the back is a bit unusual:
I can barely tell a bad redial on a 1960's model, and the earlier models are still a mystery. There is something here that does not 'feel' right. What do the wiser members here think?