Need Some Expert/enthisiast Input.. Blue Co-axial Deville.

Posts
10
Likes
0
I suppose I should have closed the loop...
went with the AT after seeing it in Skyfall ...
also bought a black strap, but haven't yet put it on... The bracelet looks sooo nice...
I find the size near perfect, although it starts to look small in shirt sleeves.
U understand that Daniel Craig has very slight wrists....
the dial is amazing and with the antireflection, the texture and the Colour really pop!
You just can't capture it well enough in pictures.
Superdoc, very nice! IMHO you couldn't have gone wrong with either watch. The thread was kind of like watching a 2 hour movie and then it suddenly ended without telling you whodoneit. (Aside, I just saw one of those, WWZ.) The antireflective coatings do seem to bring out nuances in the dials, and the texturing on your watch's dial is superb. Co-axial movement too boot. Dual barrels, 60 hours power reserve. Omega site has the case diameter at 41.5MM, not a small watch by any means. Can certainly see why you chose this one. Will have to hunt one down at a local jeweler to see it in person. Enjoy!!!
 
Posts
968
Likes
3,609
Superdoc, very nice! IMHO you couldn't have gone wrong with either watch. The thread was kind of like watching a 2 hour movie and then it suddenly ended without telling you whodoneit. (Aside, I just saw one of those, WWZ.) The antireflective coatings do seem to bring out nuances in the dials, and the texturing on your watch's dial is superb. Co-axial movement too boot. Dual barrels, 60 hours power reserve. Omega site has the case diameter at 41.5MM, not a small watch by any means. Can certainly see why you chose this one. Will have to hunt one down at a local jeweler to see it in person. Enjoy!!!

Thanks - the 41.5 is a new model - announced at Basel - not available when I got mine ...

I've been curious to see the 41.5 - although with the thin bezel, I find the AT 41.5 models to actually wear larger than the 45.5 PO...I think it comes down to Dial size, not case size...
 
Posts
10
Likes
0
It just clicked in that a version of your watch was the cover story of the Watch Time magazine, April 2013. It was the GMT version and their pros were: Handsome, highly detailed design and High-performance manufacture caliber. Their one con was: The polishing and finishing aren't perfect. Pros and cons are all reflected in this thread. Gave it 84 points, with no area losing more than a point or two. Movement accuracy was an average of +6 seconds a day with a deviation of only 2 seconds in all positions. While COSC allows +6/-4 seconds to certify as a Chronometer, I've always viewed anything more than half a minute a week (4 seconds plus) not so hot for a high end brand. All of my manufacture watches are in the 3-4 seconds a day range (Rolex GMT II runs in the 2-3 seconds a day range). All that means to me practically, is I set the watch once a week after getting home from church on Sundays, and I am good to go for the week. So I guess this is where I had my questions about the co-axial movement. That said, Watch Time pretty consistently hyperventilates positively about George Daniel's creation. All in all the article put the Speedmaster Aqua Terra (AT) in the world class quality, looks and performance category. An extraordinary watch.
 
Posts
967
Likes
1,019
I do think that the omega website does not do the watches justice. Take the brown dial saphire sandwich. I tried it on and on the web it looks like a brown dial but in person not that much. I prefer the hesalite version much more after listening on here. If you are thinking about a speedmaster the gentleman Kringly has the best prices. No where in Pennsylavania could you find a better price. But back to your blue I assume that is the 41.5 mm?
 
Posts
4
Likes
0
Movement accuracy was an average of +6 seconds a day with a deviation of only 2 seconds in all positions.
Southlake13 is this your personal observation or is it what you read somewhere?

I have an HV since a month and the 8500 is just amazing, it advances 3 to 5 sec per week (depending on watch's night resting position) which is an accuracy of 99.9995 to 99.9992 % !!!!!! (or +0.43 and +0.71 sec per day). I read on some other forums that people observe more or less the same data as mine. Of course, I don't believe that every 8500 movement in the world is adjusted to this accuracy, but I'm a believer that Omega has procedures to readjust them when they are sent back. I also read somewhere that George Daniel managed to have an accuracy of +5 sec per year with this movement but he knew how to position the watch depending different parameters (I suppose the temperature is an important one).

And some pictures ...

 
Posts
10
Likes
0
Southlake13 is this your personal observation or is it what you read somewhere?

I have an HV since a month and the 8500 is just amazing, it advances 3 to 5 sec per week (depending on watch's night resting position) which is an accuracy of 99.9995 to 99.9992 % !!!!!! (or +0.43 and +0.71 sec per day). ]

Sharlo, you have a stunningly beautiful watch! Can tell you are enjoying it. The +6 seconds a day came from a Watch Time magazine article on the new Aqua Terra (April 2013 edition, page 68). They said they ran the tests on their machine, apparently in their test lab. Since everyone on this forum who have co-axials are having a different experience I checked two other Omega watch reviews with co-axials Watch Time has done recently and both had accuracy in the 2.5-3 seconds a day. Guess the AT just needed a bit of fine tuning by Omega.

By the way, don't want to overstate the importance of watch accuracy. It is but one of many factors in picking a watch. And like everyone else, it seems, on this forum my mechanical watches aren't museum pieces. They sit on my wrist, and as such are responsible for making sure I get to the train on time, make it to meetings on time, etc. If accuracy was the only parameter we would all have watches with radio receivers to the atomic clocks. I have one of those and never wear it. At the end of the day I am here on this forum because of the fantastic little marvels that sit inside a mechanical watch, fueled by our arm movements. The fact that your Omega is accurate to 3-5 seconds a week is one of life's little joys. I am starting to understand why there are so many Omega zealots on this forum!
 
Posts
968
Likes
3,609
I've never worn a single watch for enough consecutive days to notice any time loss... But I will say how impressive the power reserve is on these ...
but here is a naked eye comparistheir the two newest...
 
Posts
34,264
Likes
38,883
Very nice Overseas, you don't see many of those around
 
Posts
967
Likes
1,019
Running the risk of going off topic, which Speedmaster do you have? What is it you like about it that makes it your favorite. Picking up my first Omega on Friday, a Speedy Date Panda, 3304 calibre.
I have the 3570 hesalite speedmaster professional.