It was an honest mistake about what exactly was the step and I payed him $2000 for the less desirable year because I think it will cleanup nicely after I got my hands on it today.
For $2k I would have broken my fingers getting my wallet out.
Did your post above suggest he had another one?
Agreed- we all dream of the diamond in the rough- looked horrible but we knew better. Got it for a steal while everyone turned their nose up. Scrubbed it in the sink with a toothbrush, a little polywatch and voila! - a stunning gem that runs perfectly and gleams like a new penny….but that is usually very far from reality.
Most of the people who have been at this a while have a deep stash of parts, skills to do much of the work themselves (if not all but the full movement service) and the fortitude to take a gamble and lose- but parlay that loss into another project.
Most importantly they know how to identity when it’s worth it and when it’s not.
If you see the watch in the metal tomorrow, it speaks to you and the seller is willing to negotiate (cash is king, have a wad with $2k in one pocket and the other $1k in another pocket so you aren’t removing money from the pot but adding) then enjoy your prize and think about next steps after enjoying it for a few weeks. But if you are already thinking of the “project”, then it may end up being more than care to deal with.
I will post dial pics after the hurricane and unfortunately I’m getting recalled into the firehouse for the next few days since apparently the storm is dead set for Tampa Bay. Thanks as always for the veteran opinions. -Scott
Thanks guys. It looked rough in the pictures and It’s a good thing I followed through with it and met the guy.
Curious to hear your impressions after seeing the watch in real life. It's definitely not a -71 with a step dial... I do like the bezel and dial font from the late 70s/early 80s though, step dial or not.
There is a similar watch for sale in the private sales section right now that you can use as a point of comparison.
Dial is only from 1974 through Sept of 1977 on 145.022-74 and -76. That is not a late 70's dial as shown by the "Short S" where the "S" in Speedmaster does not drop down to the bottom of the "p." Late 70's through the 80's had the "Tall S" where the S dropped down to the bottom of the p.