Community Stories

My recently purchased Seamaster 166.003 possible redial?

Makesbelieve
Posts
592
Likes
4,936
Hi all!

I recently purchased this 166.003 which I really love.

I got it at the great price of $180 USD and it's in fantastic condition. I'm super happy with it so if you answer 'yes' to the question 'is this a redial?' I won't be too fussed but I am slightly curious as the dial just seems too perfect...

Would love to know your thoughts, opinions.
Thanks in advance,
Matt
 
IMG_6452.jpeg IMG_6451.jpeg IMG_6450.jpeg
Davidt
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,957
At first glance it looks good but I’d expect to see ‘Swiss Made T’ on these mid-late 60’s gilt dials.
What’s the serial number?
 
Makesbelieve
Posts
592
Likes
4,936
It just has 'Swiss Made' no T (attached a better photo) but I thought that the T implied luminance which this watch doesn't have. Serial is 2429XXXX
 
IMG_6453.jpeg
Davidt
Posts
13,201
Likes
22,957
To me it looks like the hour markers are inlaid with lume like on my 166.010 below.

It’s a different reference but in my experience the 166.010, 166.002 and 166.003 with these gilt, gloss black dials usually have makers with the inlaid lume.

411E12D1-07F9-4705-ABB9-42F986BC9E16.jpeg
 
X350 XJR
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,777
Looks like a nice original no lume dial.

Some of these have very fine striations on the center facets.
 
Makesbelieve
Posts
592
Likes
4,936
Thanks @Davidt . I've taken a close up shot and they don't seem to be lumed. Just a solid steel bar (check photo). Thanks for your responses by the way, I really appreciate them.
 
IMG_6460.jpeg
worldwidewes
Posts
138
Likes
103
I'm definitely not as experienced with examining dials as many others here, but it looks good to me. The text is clean and sharp, and the font is correct. The minute markers are all consistent with each other in length, sharpness, and distance. It looks like a nice, original dial to me.
 
__ryan__
Posts
430
Likes
2,204
It looks promising to me. You could take a look at the text and minute track under a loupe. If it's an original gilt dial, the base metal of the dial should show through.
 
Caliber561
Posts
1,567
Likes
2,677
Looks legit to me. If it were a redial this good, the seller's asking would have an extra digit at the end. At $180, the watch would be a bargain in that condition even without a gilt dial.
 
SOG53
Posts
3,019
Likes
6,436
At that price it surely worth a chance, and it seems like you have scored!
 
mrbreen
Posts
415
Likes
1,088
Looks like luminous on the markers. A cheap UV light would confirm (maybe even a flashlight and a dark room). I see no luminous in the hands, so that’s an issue which would make me question the dial as well. Regardless, a score at $180
IMG_0378.jpeg
 
Olhenry56
Posts
631
Likes
788
Nice one, IMO. Clearly gilt and not painted as the reflection of the phone taking the photo makes it difficult to see the text and minutes track between 6 and 8 in the first photo. I don't think that would happen if they were painted. Not to say that gilt implies original, but if there are convincing gilt redials, I haven't seen them. The most important question is, where on earth did you find that for $180??
 
Makesbelieve
Posts
592
Likes
4,936
Olhenry56 Olhenry56
The most important question is, where on earth did you find that for $180??

Japan, the level of quality vintage watches at reasonable prices in that country is absurd. I guess it has a lot to do with the Japanese approach to property, people and personal responsibility. I have sourced half my watch collection through Japan and never had a bad experience... you do need to know what you're looking for though as despite what I've said above the place seems to be swimming in fake vintage Seamaster 300s
 
mrbreen
Posts
415
Likes
1,088
So the hands seem to have been replaced (and show oxidation), but everyone thinks the flawless dial is original? Color me skeptical
 
X350 XJR
Posts
13,483
Likes
31,777
mrbreen mrbreen
So the hands seem to have been replaced (and show oxidation), but everyone thinks the flawless dial is original? Color me skeptical

You're looking for something that simply isn't there (lume).
 
Makesbelieve
Posts
592
Likes
4,936
Honestly @mrbreen I can't see any lume (see image) I think @X350 XJR is right, which would make the hands original or at least fitting. Thanks for all your replies 😀
Edited:
 
IMG_6471.jpeg
SOG53
Posts
3,019
Likes
6,436
mrbreen mrbreen
Looks like luminous on the markers. A cheap UV light would confirm (maybe even a flashlight and a dark room). I see no luminous in the hands, so that’s an issue which would make me question the dial as well. Regardless, a score at $180
IMG_0378.jpeg
Look at OP post just above the markers are steel no lume
 
Makesbelieve
Posts
592
Likes
4,936
All good @mrbreen , made me look harder, and I learnt something (that lume can also be inlaid), thanks for your input. Much appreciated!
 
impalla62ss
Posts
1,162
Likes
6,031
I would say from my experience that is is original. The gilt text looks perfect to me.
 
5 More Posts...
Sign up or log in to reply...

Similar threads

bkomegaman

Recently Purchased Omega Constellation 167.005, good deal?

bkomegaman Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
bkomegaman
bkomegaman
Posts
10
Views
1K
Tron

Recently Purchased Omega - 1939

Tron Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Dan S
Dan S
Posts
3
Views
1K
A

Recently Purchased

Alfa8910 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
theluckyluke
theluckyluke
Posts
2
Views
2K
Ctau67

Recently purchased 30T2

Ctau67 Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
Ctau67
Ctau67
Posts
6
Views
2K
F

Seeking Advice of the Wiser - Recently Purchased My First Watch

franklyfresh Open Discussion
jsducote
jsducote
Posts
23
Views
3K
Mad Dog

What is the specific function of this Omega “pad” included with my recently purchased 105.003?

Mad Dog Vintage Omega Watches Help, Discussion and Advice
g-boac
g-boac
Posts
40
Views
8K