Longines Tre Tacche 35mm

Posts
2,201
Likes
15,533
In terms of finding photos of examples, it depends on the thing I am looking for. In many cases, I will search the internet as certain websites serve as useful archives. For other things (e.g. unusual examples), I do have various folders with photos that I have saved.

Good observation, regarding the "s" in Longines! I would guess that it was a batch with flawed printing.

P.S. Have you measured the diameter of this dial? Also, did it come with a movement?
Yes, the diameter is around 27.5mm
 
Posts
6
Likes
7
Yes you are right that it looks like the same dial in both of these, so probably the seller have swapped the dials since he is clearly stating it is different watches (with different ref numbers and origin country). Looks like the second one have different or relumed hands as well? Or is it just the different lighting?

I specifically asked Longines when asking for an extract of mine and got this answer:
"I'm sorry to inform you that we don't provide any information on the dial. Regarding your second request, we only provide historical information kept in our archives on the basis of the serial number that is engraved on the watch.

In our registers, the original serial number 6'461'428 identifies a wristwatch in stainless steel bearing the order number 22243 and the reference 4142. It is fitted with a Longines manually wound mechanical movement, caliber 12.68N."

So unfortunately Longines don't seem to provide any more information regarding the dial.
Howdy,
I have original serial number 6'461'418 which is a wristwatch in stainless steel bearing the order number 22243 and the reference 118.
 
Posts
2,793
Likes
4,841
E Etumon
Howdy,
I have original serial number 6'461'418 which is a wristwatch in stainless steel bearing the order number 22243 and the reference 118.
Wow, such a close serial number! Thank you for sharing photos. Your watch looks very original, to me. I would guess that @hejsam's example looked quite similar when new.
 
Posts
2,201
Likes
15,533
E Etumon
Howdy,
I have original serial number 6'461'418 which is a wristwatch in stainless steel bearing the order number 22243 and the reference 118.
Very nice, thanks for sharing.

Do you have the ability to take some more photos with focus on the dial and preferably with a polished crystal or even better with the dial outside the case? Would like to study how the dial looks 😀
 
Posts
2,793
Likes
4,841
Another 35mm tre tacche with "sei tacche dial"
As always, it would be great to know what is written in Longines' archive.
 
Posts
2,201
Likes
15,533
Stumble upon this 35mm tre tacche with centrum second, what do you think about it @DirtyDozen12?
Hard to say but dial does not look flat, hands and numerals does not look typical to the 35mm tre tacches I have seen (thinner).

 
Posts
2,793
Likes
4,841
Stumble upon this 35mm tre tacche with centrum second, what do you think about it @DirtyDozen12?
Hard to say but dial does not look flat, hands and numerals does not look typical to the 35mm tre tacches I have seen (thinner).
As with almost all 35 mm tre tacches, I am not certain. I cannot tell whether the dial is flat or convex. The design of the outer track is consistent with the invoice year (1941), I believe. Here is a 30 mm/10.68N example for reference: https://omegaforums.net/threads/1941-longines-with-military-connection.150015/. I would have expected a signature that resembles the one on the example that I linked to. That signature was typical of Fluckiger dials from the mid-1930s to early 1940s. Like you, I wonder if these thinner hands are correct or not. I find it interesting that the watch was originally invoiced to Egypt, though I cannot conclude anything from that alone.

Source: https://curious-curio.jp/watch/39891