Is this watch real or fake thread - aka Fake Busters!!

Posts
1
Likes
0
Hello all, I am looking at this 2006 Aqua Terra (25033300) from a gray market dealer, comes with full set. From my own research and comparing it with other watches online it looks fine but I am by no means an expert, or even an amateur. What are your thoughts? Also wondering if there is a way of distinguishing if the 2500 movement is a 2500a, b, or c by looking at the case back (from what I understand 2006 is too early for 2500d movements). Thanks!

 
Posts
157
Likes
176
Hello all, I am looking at this 2006 Aqua Terra (25033300) from a gray market dealer, comes with full set. From my own research and comparing it with other watches online it looks fine but I am by no means an expert, or even an amateur. What are your thoughts? Also wondering if there is a way of distinguishing if the 2500 movement is a 2500a, b, or c by looking at the case back (from what I understand 2006 is too early for 2500d movements). Thanks!


Looks like a legit example to me
 
Posts
14
Likes
10
ive posted simmilar post in vintage awatches 馃榿 can someone delete it?
I鈥檓 looking at this Omega Seamaster in an auction and I鈥檇 appreciate a sanity check from people who know these well.

These are literally all the photos available from the auction house. There are no movement photos, no serial number photo, no inside clasp photo, no caseback interior photo, and no reference number stated in the listing.

From the visible details, it looks to me like a Seamaster 300M sword-hand model, likely a 2254.50, but I want to ask a more specific question:

Do these photos show any obvious fake tells, major mismatch signs, or non-original parts?

A few things I noticed:


  • the watch head looks broadly correct to me
  • the bracelet end links appear to be stamped 825
  • if that reading is correct, the bracelet may be a Bond-style 1503/825 rather than the factory-correct 1610/930 usually associated with the 2254.50
  • so I鈥檓 aware it may be a bracelet swap, but I鈥檓 mainly trying to understand whether the watch itself shows any obvious authenticity issues

What I鈥檇 like help with:


  • does the dial look correct?
  • do the hands look correct?
  • does the bezel insert, font, and pearl look right?
  • do the case shape, helium valve, crown guards, and caseback look right?
  • does the bracelet and clasp look like genuine Omega, even if it may be the wrong bracelet for the reference?
  • do you see anything here that would make you seriously worry about a fake or franken watch?

I know nobody can fully authenticate a watch from auction photos alone, but I鈥檇 really value opinions on whether there are any visible red flags.


Thanks a lot.

 
Posts
5
Likes
0
Just bought a speedmaster for my dad, after receiving it I noticed the caseback looked off from other reference photos. Does everything seem okay? I want to make sure before gifting it to him.

 
Posts
2,979
Likes
8,734
ive posted simmilar post in vintage awatches 馃榿 can someone delete it?
I鈥檓 looking at this Omega Seamaster in an auction and I鈥檇 appreciate a sanity check from people who know these well.

These are literally all the photos available from the auction house. There are no movement photos, no serial number photo, no inside clasp photo, no caseback interior photo, and no reference number stated in the listing.

From the visible details, it looks to me like a Seamaster 300M sword-hand model, likely a 2254.50, but I want to ask a more specific question:

Do these photos show any obvious fake tells, major mismatch signs, or non-original parts?

A few things I noticed:


  • the watch head looks broadly correct to me
  • the bracelet end links appear to be stamped 825
  • if that reading is correct, the bracelet may be a Bond-style 1503/825 rather than the factory-correct 1610/930 usually associated with the 2254.50
  • so I鈥檓 aware it may be a bracelet swap, but I鈥檓 mainly trying to understand whether the watch itself shows any obvious authenticity issues

What I鈥檇 like help with:


  • does the dial look correct?
  • do the hands look correct?
  • does the bezel insert, font, and pearl look right?
  • do the case shape, helium valve, crown guards, and caseback look right?
  • does the bracelet and clasp look like genuine Omega, even if it may be the wrong bracelet for the reference?
  • do you see anything here that would make you seriously worry about a fake or franken watch?

I know nobody can fully authenticate a watch from auction photos alone, but I鈥檇 really value opinions on whether there are any visible red flags.


Thanks a lot.

It looks all good. That is none of the easy tells, that a amature like me, of a fake are present.
So I have to answer yes to all your bullet points exept the last one.

The model may be 2054.50 https://watchcharts.com/watch_model/585-omega-seamaster-300m-chronometer-2054-50/overview