Ottsby
·Best looking modern Speedmaster, I'd say. I wish they would have added an adjustable clasp on the metal bracelet.
Yes, of course you can but Speedy won’t be certified for him. Just don’t let him pilot the ship.
the new wording is in response to people who are easily triggered.
What an utterly childish take. Unless, of course, you have evidence of this statement? Or perhaps you're an astronaut yourself, and can demonstrate the courage and strength of character that the women astronauts have done? Because it is the consideration of those women that 'triggered' the word change.
And may I suggest if you are constantly feeling emasculated and 'unmanned' by societies recognition of ALL her contributors then you didn't have much in the way of the required equipment in the first place.
Quick micro adjustment makes a significant difference in comfort when wearing a watch all day, even if it is just one small step.
Even the 321 priced at $14K does not allow for quick adjustment without tools. They have it on some of their other clasps; they have a proven design with works well. I don't think the incremental cost of production would be prohibitive. It is quite baffling.
It’s funny that Archer suggests that there should be a trigger warning for those who object to the new wording, since the new wording is in response to people who are easily triggered.
Never fear, I predict that the old wording will spur a black market for the incredibly insensitive and sexist “manned” casebacks (which will be henceforth known as the MCB). We’re all holding future classics, gentlemen...oops, please excuse...gentleHUmen.
Of course, you won’t be able to buy or sell MCB’s on eBay or any other public sales forum. You will have to sell them in private away from public scrutiny, just like Adolf Hitler paintings or lawn jockies.
What an utterly childish take. Unless, of course, you have evidence of this statement? Or perhaps you're an astronaut yourself, and can demonstrate the courage and strength of character that the women astronauts have done? Because it is the consideration of those women that 'triggered' the word change.
And may I suggest if you are constantly feeling emasculated and 'unmanned' by societies recognition of ALL her contributors then you didn't have much in the way of the required equipment in the first place.
Responses like this are such a turn off. It's this type of rhetoric that pull me further and further from the forums. I can enjoy my watches without participating and having to read this. Thought this topic was about a new Speedmaster model.
It's in accordance with the NASA style guide;
Gender-Specific Language (e.g., Manned Space Program vs. Human Space Program)
In general, all references to the space program should be non-gender-specific (e.g., human, piloted, unpiloted, robotic, as opposed to manned or unmanned). The exception to the rule is when referring to the Manned Spaceflight Center (also known as the Manned Spacecraft Center), the predecessor of Johnson Space Center in Houston, or to any other historical program name or official title that included “manned” (e.g., Associate Administrator for Manned Spaceflight)
https://history.nasa.gov/styleguide.html
I agree, however it would probably make the clasp bigger which was one of the main bugbears of the 60th.
bracelet itself, I love it and it’s one of the most comfortable I’ve worn across all brands. Thankfully i wear mine looser rather than tighter so I don’t need to adjust often, if at all.
It’s funny that Archer suggests that there should be a trigger warning for those who object to the new wording, since the new wording is in response to people who are easily triggered.
Just having a laugh at the controversy a word change has had. 😉 Don’t really care what it says personally but it has upset a few people....
Collectors and enthusiasts always get caught up in details like this, its like those who need the SMP that was the theatrical release bracelet vs the updated one...but in this case the manned text is period correct vs human which isn't
In all my years on forums, seeing the old case back, not once have I seen anyone "triggered" by the wording. On the other hand, several people have most certainly been triggered by the change.
I think that @Iceter was trying to be droll, and @Dedalus05 may have missed it because it was too far over to the subtle side. I think. But if I’m incorrect, then his response was warranted, minus the personal insults...