Is this Seamaster 300 legit?

Posts
34
Likes
13
Hi everyone,

Can someone help me identify if this watch is legit or if it has any red flag? From what I could check from omegaseamaster300, it seems OK, but I have been wrong before about this particular watch.

Thanks

 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,102
AFAICS: hands look relumed - dial OK - bezel ??? -> does not look original
 
Posts
334
Likes
277
Cal 563, so an American market piece. 1969 serial number, so the bezel looks about right to me. I don’t see any red flags, but I’ve been wrong before.
 
Posts
34
Likes
13
Cal 563, so an American market piece. 1969 serial number, so the bezel looks about right to me. I don’t see any red flags, but I’ve been wrong before.
Thanks.
Do you think the hands are relumed?
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,102
Thanks.
Do you think the hands are relumed?
compare the min.- and h.-hand vs. the seconds-hand and check the bezel (with UV) too. The bezel looks (AFAICS) newer than the rest. Perezscope "overall matching patina"
 
Posts
2,927
Likes
6,102
not the seconds-hand ! - you can see the difference...

for comparison - colour of the three hands (and bezel, and dial !)

 
Posts
288
Likes
209
Based on SN this is the very last US batch, build around 22JUN69.
I`d say the watch is in original condition, no relume.