Is Rolex Boring Anybody Else?

Posts
622
Likes
289
Hi all.

Is anybody else bored with Rolex? Or maybe my tastes in watches is evolving. But it just seems like they never do anything exciting, or anything risky, or anything different.

How about a manual wind triple date moonphase - something like that.

What do you think?
 
Posts
27,593
Likes
70,193
I have no interest in their modern watches, so I guess you could say I find them boring. Unfortunately when they decide not to be completely boring they put out stuff like this:



And this:



And even when the movement has some technical merit, they make the watch completely fugly like the Yachtmaster II...

If they were to do some sort of re-issue of a vintage design, like Omega is doing with the SM300, so with matte dial, maybe tinted lume, and not so much "bling" then I think they would sell like hotcakes, but that does not seem to be their direction.
 
Posts
922
Likes
4,840
I agree Al. The DRSD you have is amazing. I'd be interested in a throwback like that without PCLs, ceramic bezels or glossy dials. The matte dial with red writing and lug holes is what's iconic - not all the current flash.
 
Posts
4,824
Likes
31,586
I see watches that resemble the pictures posted in the center isle of department stores going for 50% off. One step below Invicta. My immediate thought is that those are knock-offs or somebody is playing with photoshop.
 
Posts
25,980
Likes
27,627
What's boring to some is tradition to others. The Rolex GMT and Submariner have had roughly the same styling over decades, which mirrors the Porsche 911 - and both are valuable to collectors.
 
Posts
2,748
Likes
27,016
What's boring to some is tradition to others. The Rolex GMT and Submariner have had roughly the same styling over decades, which mirrors the Porsche 911 - and both are valuable to collectors.

911.jpg

Agree but always thought of Porsche drivers as Omega men, Rolex wearers go for Mercedes and BMW's, right?
 
Posts
201
Likes
183
I can see how people can get bored with them. They haven't changed in decades, but that being said. There's something to be said about not swiftly jumping into something different when Rolex knows what they do well. I personally love their new beefy ceramic subs.
 
Posts
8,742
Likes
69,416
...I personally love their new beefy ceramic subs.

As do I!


Takes nothing away from my appreciation for Omega or other brands. Variety blah blah spice blah blah.
 
Posts
884
Likes
851
Bored no, irritated yes.

WG ceramic Pepsi, discontinuation of the Air-King officially, disregarding their enthusiast market.

Omega still gives us archive extracts and interesting pieces which harken back to bygone times.
 
Posts
8,140
Likes
19,090
I would not say boring, but I do say the “newer models do not appeal me” – and it is the beefier scheme of these new models that turns me off – for me, this is where Rolex’s classic looks ended. It seems that making watches with larger cases has been one of Rolex’s main shift in their new product strategy (evident in the lineup of their traditional models like the Sub, SD, GMT, Explorer and Daytona – all of these going from a 36-40mm case range to larger 42-44mm cases). Is this an attempt to fit in with the growing trend of the large-case wrist watch fashion?? Is Rolex targeting the younger generation of Millennials with their new lineup of larger watches and fight back to recover share lost in the luxury watch search/inquires market to Omega over the last few years? – I can’t validate the data on this chart or how it may correlate to an actual sales market share, but the chart shows Omega gaining ground -at least- in the battle of “watch searches/inquires” against Rolex over the last few years. From what I gather, the folks who try to get actual sales market share say this is a very close-hold secret in Switzerland. Dunno, but Omega’s recent releases of models reviving some of their original classic models and increasing Boutique presence could present a more real threat and challenge to Rolex’s popularity and the actual market share in terms of real sales. No doubt that the Rolex brand, popularity and marketing strategy is a heavy hitter in the luxury watch industry – do you think Omega will ever surpass Rolex in terms of sales market share?
 
Posts
3,849
Likes
27,357
I've never even bought a new Rolex (unless a Tudor counts). The ones who run the company now seem to have little real appreciation for their heritage. And I also think the Yachtmaster 2 (and Skydweller -- despite its technical achievements) is really ugly (but I rather like the blue-dial Yachtmaster and GMT Master II with blue & black bezel).
Edited:
 
Posts
15,048
Likes
24,018
I can see how people can get bored with them. They haven't changed in decades, but that being said. There's something to be said about not swiftly jumping into something different when Rolex knows what they do well. I personally love their new beefy ceramic subs.
As do I!


Takes nothing away from my appreciation for Omega or other brands. Variety blah blah spice blah blah.
I think they should have increased the width of the bracelet to match, it looks under size to me now. 🙁
 
Posts
27,593
Likes
70,193
I see watches that resemble the pictures posted in the center isle of department stores going for 50% off. One step below Invicta. My immediate thought is that those are knock-offs or somebody is playing with photoshop.

If you are implying the photos I posted are not real Rolex models, you are mistaken. This is the way those 2 watches come from the factory...

Here is an advert for the "Zebra Datejust"

http://www.jomashop.com/rolex-watch-116189bbr.html

And the Leopard Daytona is actually a very well known model. No photoshop involved. GIYF.

Cheers, Al
 
Posts
4,824
Likes
31,586
Wasn't implying that, and did just Google Rolex Leopard Daytona. While I do know what a Daytona looks like, I did not regonize it as being a Daytona in the pic you posted. On top of that list price is ~$55,000. Wow. Looks like there are tons of replicas of this model too.
Edited:
 
Posts
4,824
Likes
31,586
Do we ever see this posted on omegaforum.net - "Rolex Leopard Daytona -just landed"
 
Posts
5,186
Likes
4,719
Do we ever see this posted on omegaforum.net - "Rolex Leopard Daytona -just landed"


No - purely and simply because it's ugly.

I have 2 modern Rolex's the GMT II and the green glass Milguass apart from that I now find my self thinking they look boring. I have actually considered selling mine but every time I come to it I decide not to.



It was only the other day I was discussing in the Omega Boutique that Rolex are not being innovative as omega are. Look at the DSOTM, GSOTM, 45th anniversary the remake of the SM300 - this is innovation and listening to what buyers want. Innovation for Rolex is putting a blue dial in a Sea Dweller!

Rolex just have to keep making the the models they make and they sell regardless, then they knock out the ugly stuff for the people who have more money than taste!

For me my next Rolex will be a vintage 1675 if I ever stop buying Speedmasters that is.

I will also add to the fact I find most Rolex boutiques up their arses, one I won't name in particular. If it looks like you cannot afford one some don't even speak to you & considering I always wear shorts and tee's daily they never ask if I need anything... Omega on the other hand far different.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,793
911.jpg

Agree but always thought of Porsche drivers as Omega men, Rolex wearers go for Mercedes and BMW's, right?
Not really, Porche, like Rokex, has become a symbol of "making it" I'm sorry because they're both great on their own right but 90% of new rokex and porches are owned by people trying to prove something, or compensate. And new Porches don't quite look like this beauty you posted. Basically the brand wears you or drives you, instead of the other way around.
 
Posts
45
Likes
21
They were boring in the seventies, when I started getting interested in watches, and they are still boring. Same models, same dated design, same technology, and they keep on boasting about "oyster" cases and "superlative" chronometres…
 
Posts
5,186
Likes
4,719
They were boring in the seventies, when I started getting interested in watches, and they are still boring. Same models, same dated design, same technology, and they keep on boasting about "oyster" cases and "superlative" chronometres…

Those things that were 'boring' in the seventies are now worth a stack of cash!

The 930 Turbo alone has shot up in value and for a Turbo Cabriolet 1989 your looking at $150k to $275k