I want to love my Speedmaster, but I don't even like it...

Posts
261
Likes
201
I tried to love the speedy 4x lol. Kept buying bad selling them. Then I realized that I’m not a chrono guy
 
Posts
893
Likes
3,009
Little known fact: Mick Jones wrote this song after failing to bond with his Speedmaster

 
Posts
535
Likes
854
Yes - feeling shame. Yes, impulse. But purchased it grey so in for $4600 on the Sapphire Sandwich model with all the trimmings.
Don't really need a Chrono - do you? Besides, worried about its water tightness - those pushers feel not so hardy.
3 months
Bracelet and three leather straps / w deployants and then of course the NASA velcro and the Omega NATO that came with it.
Yes - see above. With 5 year warrantee from the dealer (no Omega warranty with grey market purchase).

I think I may have found the problem....

No disrespect for sapphire, but I do think your first speedy should be Hesalite. It’s a lot easier to love that way
Edited:
 
Posts
8,711
Likes
14,617
I tried to love the speedy 4x lol. Kept buying bad selling them. Then I realized that I’m not a chrono guy
Don't buy another one, then.
 
Posts
5,522
Likes
9,437
x2. And hesalite model + purchasing from a 'trusted reseller (not a true grey) = $3,900 and full Omega factory warranty.
 
Posts
72
Likes
156
I've gone through 3 of them, all the hesalite versions. I drank the kool-aid that everyone was serving in the form of "Every collector needs a Speedmaster!". Found out that I don't, I don't really like them. I feel like in pictures, they look great and the history is even better. But for me, in the flesh, they are not my cup of tea.
 
Posts
1,552
Likes
1,973
Same story with the Speedmaster , I got first à Shapiro sandwitch during years sold without remorse, after get the BA from 69 sold without remose, after got a ST68 sold without remorse , now the 50Th not even remove from the box , I have really strange feeling with the speedmaster that I don’t have with all the others Omega I have , maybe not for me.
 
Posts
1,933
Likes
8,481
Darjeeling tea is for connoisseurs who either already have taste for it or have acquired taste to appreciate it.
 
Posts
224
Likes
270
I tried to love the speedy 4x lol. Kept buying bad selling them. Then I realized that I’m not a chrono guy

This may be my fate...we will see.
 
Posts
1,885
Likes
24,854
Trade it in for a nice vintage Constellation PiePan 👍
 
Posts
367
Likes
501
x2. And hesalite model + purchasing from a 'trusted reseller (not a true grey) = $3,900 and full Omega factory warranty.

Agree. The only variation that would have distracted me would be the one with the Hesalite & display back. The classic "look" really goes away with a sapphire crystal. I still enjoy looking at my wrist and seeing exactly what Armstrong and all the other astronauts saw. Not only do I find the dial pleasing, balanced and ledgable, but it's just kinda neat to wear a piece of history. Shame that you have to buy the sandwich to get the display back. A bit expensive to add one, can't really justify doing it, haven't seen any of that variation on the used market, and really, one Speedmaster is enough for me.
 
Posts
8,630
Likes
71,380
I sympathise.

Your Speedy photos look great and I can easily understand that those of you who wear them are very much attached to them, and not just because they’re strapped to your wrists.

But I’m afraid I’m on the side of the heretics.

First, I find the sub-dials an irritant. Despite having owned a chronometer I found the multiplicity of dials obscured the clarity of the time. I never worked out what all the little dials were for, nor how the tachymetre dial worked or what it was for. I’m afraid I just couldn’t be a**ed.

Second, I do like an automatic watch, particularly if it’s one I can also wind when necessary. Much as I like Seiko automatic movements, I find the fact that they don’t wind a nuisance.

I have pretty good long and near eyesight for a 70 year old but the reason I wear a watch is to check the time and, on occasion, the date. If ever I feel the need to wear a watch to remind me of the day of the week I’ll happily sign a power of attorney and let the kids put me in a home.
 
Posts
7,682
Likes
14,208
Same story with the Speedmaster , I got first à Shapiro sandwitch during years sold without remorse, after get the BA from 69 sold without remose, after got a ST68 sold without remorse , now the 50Th not even remove from the box , I have really strange feeling with the speedmaster that I don’t have with all the others Omega I have , maybe not for me.
With your history with three prior Speedmasters why would you shell out $10k for the 50th? Did you really expect it to be some sort of Eureka! moment? Couldn't you have determined your feelings for it before you walked out of the AD or OB with it tucked under your arm? Just curious as to why you keep buying them?
 
Posts
5,522
Likes
9,437
But I’m afraid I’m on the side of the heretics.
Why heretics? There are plenty of OF members who don't like/ are not into Speedmasters. Just like there are OF members who are not into Seamasters, Constellations, etc. If you don't like something you don't like something -- simple as that.
 
Posts
7,682
Likes
14,208
First, I find the sub-dials an irritant. Despite having owned a chronometer I found the multiplicity of dials obscured the clarity of the time. I never worked out what all the little dials were for, nor how the tachymetre dial worked or what it was for. I’m afraid I just couldn’t be a**ed.
If an owner of a chronograph doesn't know what the subdials are for and how to read them, or even bother to learn, it is obvious he is not a customer for a chronograph. It's like buying a car with a manual transmission and then complaining that it is too complicated to drive when all he wanted was a car with an automatic transmission to go from point A to point B as simply as possible. It is up to a buyer to know what his needs are and act accordingly, a Speedmaster in this case was inappropriate from the get go. It was the wrong product.
 
Posts
367
Likes
501
If an owner of a chronograph doesn't know what the subdials are for and how to read them, or even bother to learn, it is obvious he is not a customer for a chronograph. It's like buying a car with a manual transmission and then complaining that it is too complicated to drive when all he wanted was a car with an automatic transmission to go from point A to point B as simply as possible. It is up to a buyer to know what his needs are and act accordingly, a Speedmaster in this case was inappropriate from the get go. It was the wrong product.

I'm 72, been wearing chronographs for years. Recently retired as a Biomedical Technician, found multiple uses for a chronograph in that field, including verifying timer accuracy on centrifuges, it sure beat carrying around a stopwatch, not for everyone, but in some fields, very useful. The tachymetre scale is very useful for checking automotive speedometers. It's a tool watch, sure came in handy on Apollo 13. I also use it for timing actual travel time on trips. An attractive, functional & accurate tool that for me has the additional cachet of historical significance.
 
Posts
7,682
Likes
14,208
I'm 72, been wearing chronographs for years. Recently retired as a Biomedical Technician, found multiple uses for a chronograph in that field, including verifying timer accuracy on centrifuges, it sure beat carrying around a stopwatch, not for everyone, but in some fields, very useful. The tachymetre scale is very useful for checking automotive speedometers. It's a tool watch, sure came in handy on Apollo 13. I also use it for timing actual travel time on trips. An attractive, functional & accurate tool that for me has the additional cachet of historical significance.
For you, @PhilF, a chronograph is a useful complication 😀, but for @Spruce it was a useless complication 🙁. It all comes down to what the user wants and needs, and it is up to each individual to know what they want and need.
 
Posts
367
Likes
501
For you, @PhilF, a chronograph is a useful complication 😀, but for @Spruce it was a useless complication 🙁. It all comes down to what the user wants and needs, and it is up to each individual to know what they want and need.

Absolutely agree, for most, an automatic with a date is more than adequate and money better spent. There's no logic in having a tool that goes unused, unless, of course, you just enjoy having it.
 
Posts
7,682
Likes
14,208
Absolutely agree, for most, an automatic with a date is more than adequate and money better spent. There's no logic in having a tool that goes unused, unless, of course, you just enjoy having it.
Actually, I suspect a lot of chronographs are sold because they look complicated and cool, but aren't understood or used in practice. In these cases they just enjoy having the look on their wrist, which is their choice. But don't complain if you can't read the damn dial because it's too cluttered or the sub-dials are too small.
Edited: