How come people rarely talk about the new Constellation Globemaster

Posts
512
Likes
416
Two Tone, ah yes of course, silly me.

Right; that GM you have in your sights is where I started, although I wasn’t interested in a DJ as an alternative so that made things a little easier.... decision approximately along the lines @gostang9 has already highlighted.

Is this going to be your only watch? Are you going to wear it every day or do you have other watches in a collection? Gold is pretty, but less practical than Tungsten Carbide (which I have not managed to scratch in several years of ownership).

The GM sits between the 36mm and 41mm DJs but will feel closer to the 41 in my experience.

I think the fluted bezel execution on the GM is more subtle than on the DJ, but you won’t notice it after a while so no big deal one way or the other.

I’ve no idea what the level of depreciation is on a DJ but the GM will loose circa 30% at least over a couple of years, so buy it because you like it, not for the investment potential.

You mentioned accuracy. METAS will always run slightly fast, meaning you will have to adjust it from time-to-time, the DJ could work out neutral I suppose. My GM is consistently 5 seconds fast per day, my Railmaster plus 2 per day, exactly as per METAS test data from Omega so the METAS results you get from Omega are accurate.

My advice: try them both, then try to forget about them for a month. Try them again then buy whichever one “sings” to you....or walk away.

Oh and some pictures just for your amusement
Thanks for your comments and the pictures! I'm really trying to like the bracelet of the TT Sedna Globemaster, but it's just not my cup of tea so I guess the reference on leather strap is the best option for me personally then.

I'd also love to wear a TT Datejust, but with a retail price above €10', that's not really an option for me. Which is a shame, because I'm actually starting to be a bit interested in why the world everyone else seems obsessed with Rolex. On the other hand, Omega is also a top-tier option.
Wich also brings me up to the question of the METAS certification. Off course I have no real "need" for that kind of accuracy in my life but being a tech nerd also want me to wear the best I can, given my wallet, "just because I can".
 
Posts
2
Likes
0
What do you think about the omega two tone as a daily watch? easy to dress up and down?
 
Posts
667
Likes
1,215
Whoa, never seen that GMT rendering – those can't be real, can they?

Love my white-dial GM, would love it even more with a GMT movement. Also, one thing I think is worth pointing out is that the bezel ridges are much finer (much more akin to a coin edge) than what's traditionally referred to as a 'fluted bezel', though I suppose the ship has already sailed on trying to change its nickname.

5jNvckPl.jpg
 
Posts
1,086
Likes
1,847
I think the movement and design, especially in steel with the blue dial are very good but like so many others here when you hold it it's just too big. It's unfortunate if Omega had brought it out as a classic 36mm they could have issued a bigger version later without devaluing the original but it's not really possible to do it the other way round.
 
Posts
46
Likes
165
Many of us love vintage watches because of their proportions and details. They are finer.

The modern offerings often produce an unconvincing or unresolved-feeling product in detail or proportions.

In the case of the Globemaster it’s the proportions.

I have to agree with you the most, albeit other good points were raised by others..

On Paper 39mm sounds fantastic, sort of a middle ground between vintage and modern.. then you handle it, you wear it.. and it just disappoints. As others have said, a missed opportunity
 
Posts
9,208
Likes
48,738
I pulled the trigger on one a few months back. Love it and absolutely no regrets. I think that the blue dial stainless steel version on the bracelet or the alligator strap is the way to go - quite a looker. Not sure why there is a perception that it’s too big. It doesn’t wear nearly as large as my Speedy Pro. The bracelet IS quite substantial, but the version on the alligator strap is much lighter.

Edited:
 
Posts
512
Likes
416
I pulled the trigger on one a few months back. Love it and absolutely no regrets. I think that the blue dial stainless steel version on the bracelet or the alligator strap is the way to go - quite a looker. Not sure why there is a perception that it’s too big. It doesn’t wear nearly as large as my Speedy Pro. The bracelet IS quite substantial, but the version on the alligator strap is much lighter.

I guess this is the blue dialed reference? Never seen it that "grey" before!
 
Posts
9,208
Likes
48,738
I guess this is the blue dialed reference? Never seen it that "grey" before!

The blue dialed version is a shapeshifter. Sometimes blue, sometimes gray, sometimes black. Depends on how the light hits the dial, whether inside or outside, etc. Makes it all the more interesting to look at, especially with the pie pan dial.
 
Posts
512
Likes
416
The blue dialed version is a shapeshifter. Sometimes blue, sometimes gray, sometimes black. Depends on how the light hits the dial, whether inside or outside, etc. Makes it all the more interesting to look at, especially with the pie pan dial.
Good to hear! I've been looking at the steel/gold reference with the leather strap for quite a while.
 
Posts
9,208
Likes
48,738
Rumour has it that one has to purchase the Globemaster, Annual Calendar and a Planet Ocean GMT before you can even get on the wish list to be on the waiting list for one, allegedly. That could just be fake news though, it’s hard to tell these days.

Oh no, Hans Wilsdorf and Rolex have infiltrated Omega. Say it ain’t so ...
 
Posts
111
Likes
607
I have had mine for a couple of months now and can add my impressions too.

If one doesn't force the GM into the dresser nor vintage/retro corner, it's such a nice and timeless watch. The rather edgy industrial case shape accented with the chamfered lugs makes it looking like a retro styled spaceship, yacht or car from the side view. It gives more the impression of a field watch than of a dress watch if you wear it on a nato or casual leather strap (attention: since the lug holes are drilled in quite close distance to the case, threading the nylon feels a bit clumsy, that is maybe a disadvantage, however I am glad about the GMs short L2L lenght).

I do hope they are more creative with the dial tho. For example, make it ribbon or linen dial, or add more texture. It is a flat pie pan that deserves more details.

True, the pie pan shape is flat and sometimes you cannot see the contrast, however in my view I prefer it like that. A more pronounced pan dial would be a too constrained attempt towards a particular retro design. Personally I like the GM's ambuiguity of being something between retro and modern and I prefer it to be easy to read (also by night - the lume is georgeous). The end of 60ies/beginning of 70ies connies didn't have a pan dial either - for me, the GM is much more a 70ies connie than a 50ies connie. Together with the Tungsten bezel, the Metas caliber, the perfect readability in any light condition and the 100m water resistance (altought I wouldn't swim with it anymore, had a water ingress after it seriously fell on a bathroom tile floor!), the GM is a rugged everyday watch for more than a lifetime. Probably the most perfect one.
- too massive for a subtle, understated dress piece;
- dial lies way too deep in the case, to house the flat sapphire, vintage appeal has a dial on top and a bubble plexi;
- plain case design;
- piepan dial seems to be missing sharpness and depth.
It does not have to be a sublte dress piece nor a vintage copy - that is what the Trilogy line was made for. Understated it is, completely under the radar and I find that great. Intriguing only on the second or third glance. For me it was love of first sight, however it still had to grow on me.
For me it's the fluted bezel that bothers me. So not original. Way to steal Datejust design.
70ies connies had it and other early Omegas long before Rolex designed their fluted bezel. However if you think automatically "DJ" while looking at a GM (don't think "pink elephant"), than it is not a design for you.
Not sure why there is a perception that it’s too big.
It is not. L2L it is 46mm, however because of the angular shape lugs it doesn't embrace the upper wrist so perfectly as other watches with a longer L2L length. I like this edgy character of the GM very much.
Makes it all the more interesting to look at, especially with the pie pan dial.
Absolutely.
Edited:
 
Posts
9,208
Likes
48,738
I love the watch, I loathe the bracelet.
 
Posts
111
Likes
607
Since I am a "no-bracelet"-guy, I don't care. Optically the bracelet is great, for me it was too heavy. I cannot judge the adjustability that is often criticised.
Edited: