How come people rarely talk about the new Constellation Globemaster

Posts
359
Likes
950
It's a nice watch and i did consider getting it at one point, however the fluted bezel did bug me quite a bit.
If they produce a variant with a smooth bezel and curved lugs... 🙄
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,155
I like the Globemasters, especially the older ones. It's the equivalent of the Rolex Date Just, but superior IMHO. It's a nice thin watch, date window, highly legible dial. And Omega's luminosity is generally superior to that used by Rolex. All prime considerations for me. The only reason I don't have a Globemaster myself is that my watch rotation is just two watches.
 
Posts
18,107
Likes
27,413
As soon as I start working in an office again and not from home a Globemaster is my consolation gift to myself.
 
Posts
987
Likes
796
That’s easily fixed (hope the server doesn’t break)
I just checked the Omega website but the GMT model as shown in your pictures is not shown there. They only have the annual calendar in GMT and that is 41mm and a very busy dial, not to my liking.
 
Posts
1,813
Likes
9,393
I just checked the Omega website but the GMT model as shown in your pictures is not shown there. They only have the annual calendar in GMT and that is 41mm and a very busy dial, not to my liking.
That’s because it’s an ultra limited edition only available to Globemaster Club members who, as @Foo2rama has already pointed out, are not permitted to talk about it or the club. 😎

Rumour has it that one has to purchase the Globemaster, Annual Calendar and a Planet Ocean GMT before you can even get on the wish list to be on the waiting list for one, allegedly. That could just be fake news though, it’s hard to tell these days.
 
Posts
913
Likes
8,049
Thanks @Longbow for your photos in this thread and for your great review thread as noted above.
I just thought I would add a few photos too. I love the modern Globemaster as a dress watch especially for our inclement New England weather. The size is larger than my vintage pieces but manageable for me. While I would not complain to have a slightly smaller version, I really like it on the bracelet I have other pie pan Constellations that I love but they are my fair weather friends...
Edited:
 
Posts
1,406
Likes
1,873
Perhaps because the new version shares little resemblance to the original Globemaster?
 
Posts
987
Likes
796
That’s because it’s an ultra limited edition only available to Globemaster Club members who, as @Foo2rama has already pointed out, are not permitted to talk about it or the club. 😎

Rumour has it that one has to purchase the Globemaster, Annual Calendar and a Planet Ocean GMT before you can even get on the wish list to be on the waiting list for one, allegedly. That could just be fake news though, it’s hard to tell these days.
Well, if it is that secretive I think I 'll pass. I hope there is not a goat involved also.
 
Posts
18,107
Likes
27,413
Well, if it is that secretive I think I 'll pass. I hope there is not a goat involved also.
Who’s been talking!!!
 
Posts
512
Likes
416
I'm currently in the market for a nice three-hand time/date watch that can complement my current daily chronograph. The TT rose gold on the blue leather straps looks amazing and that it a strong contender.

Let's see what the future brings!
 
Posts
1,563
Likes
5,666
I love mine and it is one of the watches that get absolutely most wear.
omega-vor-2018-9390.jpg
 
Posts
512
Likes
416
I love mine and it is one of the watches that get absolutely most wear.
omega-vor-2018-9390.jpg
Nice picture! Is that the rose gold Sedna or "regular" yellow gold?
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
I know 2 people who have the modern Globemaster on leather strap, and I am always impressed by how nice they look every time I see one them wearing theirs. It's a lovely watch that isn't too flashy but looks very nice.

It seems like a very nice casual / semi-formal / formal watch to me.
 
Posts
512
Likes
416
I know 2 people who have the modern Globemaster on leather strap, and I am always impressed by how nice they look every time I see one them wearing theirs. It's a lovely watch that isn't too flashy but looks very nice.

It seems like a very nice casual / semi-formal / formal watch to me.
I'm currently having a hard time choosing between the DateJust 36mm (blue dial) or the TT Globemaster. The METAS certification seems really interesting, although it seems like the tolerances are not as strict as the Rolex +/- 2s/day.

I know an Omega Forum is a quite a place to start asking about those things, but are there any objective points I should take into mind?
 
Posts
1,813
Likes
9,393
I'm currently having a hard time choosing between the DateJust 36mm (blue dial) or the TT Globemaster. The METAS certification seems really interesting, although it seems like the tolerances are not as strict as the Rolex +/- 2s/day.

I know an Omega Forum is a quite a place to start asking about those things, but are there any objective points I should take into mind?
What does “TT” mean?
 
Posts
512
Likes
416
What does “TT” mean?
Two Tone (gold on steel). So this is the reference I’m mostly considering as a competitor to the Datejust at this point.
 
Posts
2,675
Likes
7,487
I'm currently having a hard time choosing between the DateJust 36mm (blue dial) or the TT Globemaster.
Can't go wrong if you go with the one you like the look of most!

The METAS certification seems really interesting, although it seems like the tolerances are not as strict as the Rolex +/- 2s/day.
Asking such a question shows your life has a degree of precision not needed in mine, so I cannot advise. 😉
I wouldn't make too much out of the tolerances and certifications, both will keep time remarkably and reliably well.

know an Omega Forum is a quite a place to start asking about those things, but are there any objective points I should take into mind?
Only objective considerations in my watch buying:
- do I like it
- do I have the funds free to pay for it
- am I willing to pay what I can get it for
- do I like it more than the many other things I could buy for equivalent money

If answer is yes to those 4... I buy it and wear it happily without regret! 😎
 
Posts
1,626
Likes
6,219
I know an Omega Forum is a quite a place to start asking about those things, but are there any objective points I should take into mind?
I don’t think objective points are the best way to make decisions about an emotional purchase.
 
Posts
1,813
Likes
9,393
Two Tone (gold on steel). So this is the reference I’m mostly considering as a competitor to the Datejust at this point.
Two Tone, ah yes of course, silly me.

Right; that GM you have in your sights is where I started, although I wasn’t interested in a DJ as an alternative so that made things a little easier.... decision approximately along the lines @gostang9 has already highlighted.

Is this going to be your only watch? Are you going to wear it every day or do you have other watches in a collection? Gold is pretty, but less practical than Tungsten Carbide (which I have not managed to scratch in several years of ownership).

The GM sits between the 36mm and 41mm DJs but will feel closer to the 41 in my experience.

I think the fluted bezel execution on the GM is more subtle than on the DJ, but you won’t notice it after a while so no big deal one way or the other.

I’ve no idea what the level of depreciation is on a DJ but the GM will loose circa 30% at least over a couple of years, so buy it because you like it, not for the investment potential.

You mentioned accuracy. METAS will always run slightly fast, meaning you will have to adjust it from time-to-time, the DJ could work out neutral I suppose. My GM is consistently 5 seconds fast per day, my Railmaster plus 2 per day, exactly as per METAS test data from Omega so the METAS results you get from Omega are accurate.

My advice: try them both, then try to forget about them for a month. Try them again then buy whichever one “sings” to you....or walk away.

Oh and some pictures just for your amusement