timmy123
·Yes, that dial is also damaged. Just keep participating in the forum and look through the WRUW thread. You will see plenty of vintage watches with great dials.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Yes, that dial is also damaged. Just keep participating in the forum and look through the WRUW thread. You will see plenty of vintage watches with great dials.
I
And plenty of posters are in the business of tearing down so that they can low ball the unwitting. I’m positive this dial will go for a pretty penny on eBay. It s original and sharp.
I'm sorry if our honesty doesn't speak to you. Put it for sale at eBay starting price of 1 USD and see it fly.
Its really not hard to find a more mint example. @hoipolloi has great ones. The dial on yours is damaged.
You didn’t need to...the wear is severe, with the worn section reaching nearly across the entire arc of the rotor. Far more that would be seen due to a flattened seal.
Or maybe some that have been photoshopped or refinished. I dare say not many photographed with the detail or magnification that I show.
I
And plenty of posters are in the business of tearing down so that they can low ball the unwitting. I’m positive this dial will go for a pretty penny on eBay. It s original and sharp.
Hence, my initial post. No WM would let a 50-60 year old gasket slide, hence, a good chance of minimal maintenance over a long time, resulting in what we see, hence, expect hidden damage,too.
One does not always follow the other, but bet that way.
Intuitive hunches.
Thank you everyone for the observations and recommendations. I apologize for being an ass earlier up the thread. I had too much wine last night and it affected my judgement...took things personally and misbehaved as a result.
There are even collectors who value original spring bars, so the lack of a gasket change isn't always a sign that the watch hasn't been serviced.
Actually, there are a small number of collectors who get excited about the yellow plastic gasket, and want it left in the watch...
There are even collectors who value original spring bars, so the lack of a gasket change isn't always a sign that the watch hasn't been serviced.
Yes, I can agree on this, generally, but in this particular case, with no way to handle it, or debrief the owner, and just my eyes as my guide, I'd have flags and would seek more info and/or discount it for the mystery it presents.
The damaged gasket shows that water resistance was compromised. This pattern on the dial looks consistent with condensation.
Condensation = water intrusion.
Remember that we are not sure whether the movement goes with the case or not. There could also be replacement plates in the movement that would have replaced damaged parts.
With a 55+ year old watch, anything is possible.
There is no way to know for sure.
gatorcpa