blacksharpie
·After a long hunt, I finally tracked down a silver radial-dial, orange second hand Seamaster 168.022. The seller's photos had it on a crappy Speidle stretch bracelet but I was after the watch so I didn't really care. I was really happy when I opened the box and found, thrown in, a 1039 bracelet. Now I'm obsessed with getting the original bracelet on this watch.
I'm assuming the 1039 is original to the watch but it's missing the end links and enough extension links to actually make it wearable.
I've exhausted my resources about determining what this watch came on originally. So, before I potentially spin my wheels finding the missing parts to make the 1039 bracelet wearable two questions:
1) Is the 1039 indeed the correct bracelet for this reference/year? (seems to match in terms of serial number 28984xxx vs the 1039 stamp of 2/68
2) If so, what would be the correct 19mm end links?
I've attached photos of the watch and bracelet.
Thanks in advance for all of OF's expertise.
I'm assuming the 1039 is original to the watch but it's missing the end links and enough extension links to actually make it wearable.
I've exhausted my resources about determining what this watch came on originally. So, before I potentially spin my wheels finding the missing parts to make the 1039 bracelet wearable two questions:
1) Is the 1039 indeed the correct bracelet for this reference/year? (seems to match in terms of serial number 28984xxx vs the 1039 stamp of 2/68
2) If so, what would be the correct 19mm end links?
I've attached photos of the watch and bracelet.
Thanks in advance for all of OF's expertise.