FIFA World Cup 2026 thread

Posts
8,201
Likes
28,912
That final goal was a thing of beauty. Perfectly executed.
 
Posts
3,424
Likes
7,579
At least the match was not determined by VAR it was the performance on pitch.
 
Posts
65
Likes
39
England got the first goal then switched off.
yes what was going on, great first half and then there were so many shots on goal it was bound to go in, I'm surprised Pickford saved so many.
 
Posts
2,747
Likes
5,619
yes what was going on, great first half and then there were so many shots on goal it was bound to go in, I'm surprised Pickford saved so many.
England parked the bus after the first goal. Tuchel put on more defenders than strikers in the second half. Argentina dirty players. We should have sent in 2 & 3 Para in the first half, followed by 40, 42 and 45 Commandos in the second 😂
 
Posts
13,521
Likes
18,809
We should have sent in 2 & 3 Para in the first half, followed by 40, 42 and 45 Commandos in the second
¿En inglès, por favor?
gatorcpa
 
Posts
13,521
Likes
18,809
To counter Argentinian thuggery
Maybe send Randy Andy, too!

On another note, I just read that the World Cup Final can be decided by penalty kicks at the end?

What kind of championship gets decided this way? An insult to the players, if you ask me.

Let them play the 120 minutes and then it goes to sudden death, first real goal wins. Hockey and American Football have this right.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
6,637
Likes
10,248
On another note, I just read that the World Cup Final can be decided by penalty kicks at the end?

What kind of championship gets decided this way? An insult to the players, if you ask me.

Let them play the 120 minutes and then it goes to sudden death, first real goal wins. Hockey and American Football have this right.
gatorcpa
They did try the 'golden goal' idea for a while - but that was during extra time. First to score wins.
At one time, cup competitions were subject to a replay, if no-one won in the standard 90-minute time.

Then they introduced the full extra time so that it wasn't a hit or miss outcome and then plus penalties because they felt everyone wanted a conclusion on the day.
The penalties are because no-one wanted to see bunch of first-class footballers dropping like flies through cramp and exhaustion. (which used to happen much more often before top-class footballers became significantly fitter)
 
Posts
13,521
Likes
18,809
Then they introduced the full extra time so that it wasn't a hit or miss outcome and then plus penalties because they felt everyone wanted a conclusion on the day.
That’s OK for regular season play and preliminary rounds of the World Cup. But this is maybe the only true World’s Championship outside the Olympics.

Penalty kicks are the ultimate “hit or miss” outcome.

In a golden goal situation, both coaches would know that a war of attrition would be possible and should govern their substitutions accordingly.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
6,637
Likes
10,248
That’s OK for regular season play and preliminary rounds of the World Cup. But this is maybe the only true World’s Championship outside the Olympics.

Penalty kicks are the ultimate “hit or miss” outcome.

In a golden goal situation, both coaches would know that a war of attrition would be possible and should govern their substitutions accordingly.
gatorcpa
I think the principle is that injuries (there is only a finite number of substitutes allowed - and you don't have the facility of changing out half your team for a particular play like American football) or fitness should be the deciding factor in winning a competition.

Don't get me wrong - I really don't like any competition decided on penalties (I would much rather have a replay) but it is preferable to players falling down through cramp or fatigue - which genuinely did used to happen a lot in days gone by.

It's not much different to tennis matches being decided on the 'super tiebreak' nowadays instead of playing to the death in the third or fifth set.
 
Posts
13,521
Likes
18,809
Don't get me wrong - I really don't like any competition decided on penalties (I would much rather have a replay) but it is preferable to players falling down through cramp or fatigue - which genuinely did used to happen a lot in days gone by.
If that is the case, then allow teams to bring back one player previously substituted after the 1st 30 minute OT period.

I thought the object of the tournament is to determine the best team, not the best shooters from 12 yards out.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
6,637
Likes
10,248
If that is the case, then allow teams to bring back one player previously substituted after the 1st 30 minute OT period.
I’m afraid you’re on a decidedly sticky wicket with this solution (if you’ll pardon the mixed sporting metaphor)

What if all the substituted players are injured or just plain knackered?

It all gets much too complicated.

Hence, returning to the sub-optimal current solution.
 
Posts
35,253
Likes
39,676
Fifa 26 on Playstation 5, or Foosball would still feel a bit more fitting a solution being that its closer to the real game, but I see what you mean
 
Posts
18,431
Likes
38,361
If your'e going to pull this sort of political shit in a game of "sport", be prepared for the unintended consequences.

 
Posts
1,303
Likes
5,814
But it’s Argentina, so they might get away with it 😀
 
Posts
3,424
Likes
7,579
The deserving champions were crowned even though it was tense as it seemed like Argentina might steal the game somehow. I think Messi and team were spent too many extra time endings and the magic faded.
Ive never watched so much of a World Cup with time zones and work, this was a treat. Just hope they don’t expand to 64 teams and they drop the silly hydration ad money grab.
Felicitaciones Espana!!