drunkenseamaster
·Interesting.
I agree, wrist shape can play a big part here. My wrist is shaped so that the watch case kind of tilts to the outside of the wrist. So on my Rolex and Seiko I usually keep the 6 oclock side shorter (if both sides can't be had equal) and it seems like it helps.
I just assumed it would be the same across all brands. That's why your comment about Rolex vs Omega caught me by surprise. Thanks for sharing your perspective.
There are indeed differences between the brands on bracelet clasp design. For folding clasps, I think the important thing for comfort is to center the folding "blades" of the clasp, not necessarily the clasp itself. On the older (early 2000s & before pre-Glidelock) Rolex & most Seiko folding clasp bracelets, the blades extend well beyond the clasp (though hidden below the bracelet links), so removing links from the 6 o'clock side may center the blades under the wrist even though the clasp might be off-center. On the Omegas I've had, the clasps & blades are more the same size (making the clasp bigger allows more micro-adjustment holes), so centering the clasp usually works fine.
