Constellation or seamster conversion

Posts
6,325
Likes
9,773
That's a 168.017 upper case, now you have to find parts for 3 watches on your quest

Just 3 watches ? - what reference is that dial from?
 
Posts
2,643
Likes
3,096
168.017 caseback is good news - the crown also looks like a correct C-Case crown, I'll be up for buying the upper case and the crown with stem if you decide to split them

Worth would be $80

Caseback is I guess $50 in a long sale

You can sell the movement / dial / hands combo for $200 ish easy if you communicate that it's a valid 168.005 serial, Omega did you a solid favor there
 
Posts
6,325
Likes
9,773
The dial has:
a painted Omega
Mixed Ms
Straight Ns
A painted star.

it might be from some random 70s c-case but it’s not from any constellation I recognise.
 
Posts
631
Likes
788
Hard to tell without a straight on dial photo, but the minute track might be slightly misaligned. Could it be a service dial? Either way, none of the 4 components began their lives together.
 
Posts
43
Likes
2
Hmmm. the thing at the top and the star are both embossed silver does that mean they are still painted ?
I see the mixed ms , would someone really have replaced one?
 
Posts
6,325
Likes
9,773
Hmmm. the thing at the top and the star are both embossed silver does that mean they are still painted ?
I see the mixed ms , would someone really have replaced one?

the OMEGA and the star should be three-dimensional applied metal furniture as per this example below
(Photo from c-case thread)

It may be your photos but both look flat and painted on your example.

 
Posts
43
Likes
2
Theyre both 3d but the star is not as raised as the pic above
 
Posts
6,325
Likes
9,773
Theyre both 3d but the star is not as raised as the pic above

3D and made of applied metal ?
They should prominently stand up from the dial surface.
(Like the Omega symbol)
Neither look particularly 3D from your photos.
The OMEGA looks completely flat.
Both look painted on rather than applied pieces of metal.
Again, the photos may be misleading but they don’t look right from what we can see.

 
Posts
6,325
Likes
9,773
Also just seen this in the c case thread.
Splendid bit of photography by @BrunoCodispoti wonderfully illustrates the applied furniture on a constellation dial.
 
Posts
43
Likes
2
I see what you mean, so the symbol is raised but the rest is not. I really do have a bit of a turd here.
 
Posts
13,211
Likes
22,975
I see what you mean, so the symbol is raised but the rest is not. I really do have a bit of a turd here.

In terms of originality, yes. Didn’t your partner buy it for you though? I’d get it serviced by an independent and wear it as is.
 
Posts
6,325
Likes
9,773
I see what you mean, so the symbol is raised but the rest is not. I really do have a bit of a turd here.

well, @Milog , there’s no point sugar coating it, if not an actual turd - the mongrel that might produce one.

it’s often the case that when one thing is wrong, then multiple things could be wrong.
This was why we asked for pictures of your watch as it was a fair bet that something was up.

( I’d like to know who at Omega mistook an obvious c-case mid-case for a Seamaster case)

Generally called a ‘frankenwatch’ your watch really is made up of parts from a number of donors.

I know it’s going to bug you because it’s not correct but as ‘bitsa’ watches go, you have a very wearable watch, which looks good and has a great engine under the hood.

I’ll go back to my original advice an suggest that you come to terms with owning a mongrel and enjoy the watch for what it is.
- and then look for a correct watch of whatever reference takes your fancy after you’ve delved into the details of what makes it correct of course …..
 
Posts
43
Likes
2
In terms of originality, yes. Didn’t your partner buy it for you though? I’d get it serviced by an independent and wear it as is.
yes she gave me the money for it, but its like driving an 1 litre fiesta with xr2 bodykit on it. Ill just be a fraud
 
Posts
43
Likes
2
well, @Milog , there’s no point sugar coating it, if not an actual turd - the mongrel that might produce one.

it’s often the case that when one thing is wrong, then multiple things could be wrong.
This was why we asked for pictures of your watch as it was a fair bet that something was up.

( I’d like to know who at Omega mistook an obvious c-case mid-case for a Seamaster case)

Generally called a ‘frankenwatch’ your watch really is made up of parts from a number of donors.

I know it’s going to bug you because it’s not correct but as ‘bitsa’ watches go, you have a very wearable watch, which looks good and has a great engine under the hood.

I’ll go back to my original advice an suggest that you come to terms with owning a mongrel and enjoy the watch for what it is.
- and then look for a correct watch of whatever reference takes your fancy after you’ve delved into the details of what makes it correct of course …..
I appreciate the advice. But it will just bug me too much. Ill stick it in a cupboard and forget about it.
 
Posts
24,403
Likes
54,301
Personally, I think it's quite a remarkable watch. It's not easy to assemble something from multiple references that fits together so well and looks quite appealing.
 
Posts
13,211
Likes
22,975
yes she gave me the money for it, but its like driving an 1 litre fiesta with xr2 bodykit on it. Ill just be a fraud

Wel if you want an accurate analogy it’s like having a 1 litre Fiesta, with an XR2 body kit, a Sierra interior and wheels from an Escort 😉
 
Posts
13,211
Likes
22,975
It’s yours now anyway. Personally I’d keep it and wear it as a beater, but set aside some time and money to buy an original example and take this as part of the learning curve.