Conquest ref 9021-9025 questions / opinions on a watch.

Posts
1,775
Likes
7,719
Had to fix your suggestion. Electronic/Digital scales use load cells which are absolutely unaffected by carpet or grass.


I'm gonna cut down on beer, wine & snacks 馃檨
Edited:
 
Posts
7,293
Likes
76,579
Had to fix your suggestion. Electronic/Digital scales use load cells which are absolutely unaffected by carpet or grass.
Agreed.

I tested my postal scale similar to Bart's, and it was totally unaffected by surface. I could even hold it in the air with two fingers, and it didn't care, same reading on my watch as when it sat on a hard counter-top.
 
Posts
6,712
Likes
18,581
Agreed.

I tested my postal scale similar to Bart's, and it was totally unaffected by surface. I could even hold it in the air with two fingers, and it didn't care, same reading on my watch as when it sat on a hard counter-top.

It wasn't one of those helium-containing watches, was it?
 
Posts
7,293
Likes
76,579
It wasn't one of those helium-containing watches, was it?
Hmmm... 馃槦

I think I had already released all the Helium out of it prior to weighing...馃
 
Posts
230
Likes
546
Had to fix your suggestion. Electronic/Digital scales use load cells which are absolutely unaffected by carpet or grass.

I conducted some tests, multiple trials of both a hard surface vs a compressive one.

My procedure was to set the scale down, power on, tare the scale, then place my sieko skx on the scale. For each trail conducted the results were the same, a lower mass indicated on the compressive surface.

Quartz counter top


Grass


The readings on the scale was the same for ever trial conducted depending in the surface, 82.19 grams on the counter top, and 81.94 grams on grass. As I placed the watch head on the scale when it was on the grass I notice the grass become depressed. I have no way of measuring the force required to depress the grass.

Edit : really mad that other people got different results, not sure what to believe.
Edited: