- Posts
- 7,076
- Likes
- 13,072
SpeedyPhill
·interesting stuff, but it looks like the watches themselves can be more easily found than a NASA photo of an astronaut wearing such LCD Speedmaster
Calibres 1620/1621 - A picture guide to the LCD Speedmaster variations
- Posts
- 4,106
- Likes
- 16,320
kov
·Shame it's not your watch - they must be great finds if there are any out there.
I didn’t say I don’t have any. I just said this one is not mine 😉
- Posts
- 4,106
- Likes
- 16,320
kov
·interesting stuff, but it looks like the watches themselves can be more easily found than a NASA photo of an astronaut wearing such LCD Speedmaster
You must like repeating as you wrote this several times in different threads. Let me repeat what I already replied you, to refresh your memory.
This set of watches (numbered ones) was sent to NASA for testing, the main purpose being to provide the "new technology" watches to Shuttle Pilots.
I can imagine that the folks at NASA weren't necessarily excited about the idea of relying on electronical components in those tools as well as powering that tool with batteries that can fail or leak... Moreover, the astronauts themselves did prefer the "classical" mechanical toolwatch from what I heard from the Omega Heritage team. In the end, the Omega's suggestion remained at a suggestion stage and didn't make it in use.
On the other hand, since these watches were submitted only for testing purposes I think it's kind of obvious that we have hard time to find a picture of an astronaut wearing one of those. Testing = internal procedures. Could you find any pictures of different watches submitted to NASA by different brands for testing back in 1965? Same situation here.
- Posts
- 7,076
- Likes
- 13,072
SpeedyPhill
·Very good points indeed, AFAIK there're no photos of the watches being tested at NASA between November 1964 and March 1965 .
Lots of photos though showing the Speedmaster 105.012 watches being controlled & maintained at NASA 😉
Lots of photos though showing the Speedmaster 105.012 watches being controlled & maintained at NASA 😉
- Posts
- 204
- Likes
- 378
SoyuzPilot
·Very good points indeed, AFAIK there're no photos of the watches being tested at NASA between November 1964 and March 1965 .
Lots of photos though showing the Speedmaster 105.012 watches being controlled & maintained at NASA 😉
Maybe someone could ask Jim Ragan.
- Posts
- 204
- Likes
- 378
SoyuzPilot
·I didn’t say I don’t have any. I just said this one is not mine 😉
- Posts
- 4,106
- Likes
- 16,320
kov
·Ahhhhhh, if you've got it, flaunt it ? 😀
Read this thread entirely + check www.omegalcdspeedmaster.com + search for my sales listings in the private sales section and you'll find photographs of several examples I've owned or still have.
- Posts
- 13
- Likes
- 10
mydreamsarevivid
·HI
One of my favorite parts of the 1620 display..... if you look closely in the lower left hand corner of the LCD display ... its marked " SWISS MADE "
VERY COOL.......
Good Hunting
Bill Sohne
- Posts
- 1,753
- Likes
- 15,019
tdn-dk
·My turn to get one from the 1620/1621 family 😀
Omega Speedmaster LCD ref. 186.0010 cal. 1620 from 1979
Omega Speedmaster LCD ref. 186.0010 cal. 1620 from 1979
- Posts
- 1,753
- Likes
- 15,019
tdn-dk
·Now trimmed to 0 sec./pr. month 👍
- Posts
- 173
- Likes
- 821
- Posts
- 1,753
- Likes
- 15,019
tdn-dk
·Very cool, is it the original strap and buckle?
I'd like to get an Omega buckle for my 1860004 but I'm not sure which one is period correct 😕
No idea, it was an Omega strap and buckle I took from my spares that fit the watch 😀
Have you tried looking at the old advertisements to see what the used?
- Posts
- 4,106
- Likes
- 16,320
- Posts
- 1,753
- Likes
- 15,019
- Posts
- 4,106
- Likes
- 16,320
kov
·What is the correct buckle and strap for them, du you have at picture?
https://omegaforums.net/threads/alaska4-lcd-prototype-number-7-of-20-made-for-nasa-in-1979.67304/ Here you can see an example. I am sure about that one as the provenance was well documented.
Now, to be honest, all you need is a period correct leather strap / buckle. There wasn't any set specific to this watch reference anyway.
- Posts
- 3,202
- Likes
- 6,723
Fallout Boy
·Another "no-light" 186.004 prototype with certificate at C24:
https://www.chrono24.de/omega/omega...oject-for-nasa-shuttle-pilots--id16882637.htm
https://www.chrono24.de/omega/omega...oject-for-nasa-shuttle-pilots--id16882637.htm
- Posts
- 173
- Likes
- 821
- Posts
- 1,753
- Likes
- 15,019
tdn-dk
·Sorry I've just realized that I totally missed this question, my apologies. 😟
cal.1620 works with 1.55V batteries. According to my own experience, they last for 9 months to a year, depending on batteries you put it. By the way, I recommend to immediately remove empty batteries to reduce battery leak risk...
Is it 392 battery for them?
- Posts
- 30,231
- Likes
- 78,057
- Posts
- 173
- Likes
- 821
JC75
·We all love goodies I guess 😉
Here is a key ring produced by my dear friend Simon aka @moonphase (@moonphase.fr on IG)
By the way, there are still a few example available if you're interested 😀
Here is a key ring produced by my dear friend Simon aka @moonphase (@moonphase.fr on IG)
By the way, there are still a few example available if you're interested 😀
Edited:
Similar threads
- Posts
- 6
- Views
- 7K
- Posts
- 18
- Views
- 4K
- Posts
- 39
- Views
- 23K
- Posts
- 2
- Views
- 4K