BaselWorld 2018: Introducing The New Omega Seamaster Diver 300M

Posts
362
Likes
169
For me, I think I will buy. I have had it with the 2500 movement. My Planet Ocean has become magnetized three times! Twice last year while traveling overseas. Upon my return to the U.S. from the second trip I went to Omega in Jersey and they de-magged it. Tested it and it was back to +3 a day. Two weeks later, it was gaining 30 seconds! It had been magnetized again! I had to drive five hours to get it de-magged and tested. No clue how it was magnetized for the third time.

Okay so got it back to +3 and it was running consistently, then I stuck it in my safe and haven't worn it since. That was October last year, right before I moved to China (for a 2 year stint). I wore my Seamaster 200 "Pre-Bond" quartz instead and no longer have to worry about my watch being magnetized. Great beater. Miss the Planet Ocean on my wrist, but wasn't going to risk it again.

My best friend had the Seamaster Professional with the 2500d movement and his was magnetized twice. After the second time he was so disgusted he sold it at a huge loss. Everyone i know with the 2500 movement has had this issue.

I love the first gen Seamaster 300 Professional, especially the 2254 and the Electric Blue. Those two are perfection in their design (those sword hands are gorgeous!), but I will not buy one due to the movements not being anti-magnetic.

And so when I get back to the U.S. I will sell my Planet Ocean, at a huge loss, and buy this new Omega.

#1. I like the new design and relocated date.
#2. The look of the wave dial is fantastic to my eyes.
#3. I love that it has the micro-adjusting clasp!
#4. 42mm is perfect for me. 41mm seems a tad small. 45mm is a tad big.
#5. And that 8800 movement should allow me to travel through airports without worrying about my watch being magnetized.

I am in. 100%.

Finally, I should have an Omega diver that I can actually keep and not flip.
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
Wave length to large 馃槖
Bond bracelet 馃槵
Skelleton hands 馃槻
Modern movement 馃槜
That grey and blue dial 馃グ.

Have to see it live.
 
Posts
2,808
Likes
8,339
What amazed me about the old wave dial was how the waves could look 3D as if they were coming out of the dial right at you, and yet the printing was flat and right on top of the waves and not distorted by the 3D waves, so that I could stare at the optical illusion for hours.

This wave dial doesn't have any of that mind blowing goodness.

It's not terrible, and I wont say I'll never buy one, but I can say that I'll ever sell my blue Bond quartz with waves or my black SMPc with glossy dial.
 
Posts
6,832
Likes
13,796
I actually like the grey. On the more general sense I鈥檇 like to see in person to really evaluate the dial, wave pattern etc.

I don鈥檛 like the date at six on this model. I always like the assimetry of the smp300 which is enhanced by the bezel shape and of course the HE valve. The model is elegant within a very original shape. I鈥檇 prefer the date at 3, or even 4 or 5.

Size doesn鈥檛 bother me in principle, I have to see it in person. It鈥檚 like the new AT size. I get it, but is it an improvement? Not really, just a different size.... maybe more proportioned.... maybe
 
Posts
1,695
Likes
5,406
Wave length to large 馃槖
Bond bracelet 馃槵
Skelleton hands 馃槻
Modern movement 馃槜
That grey and blue dial 馃グ.



Have to see it live.
Was anybody expecting the new version NOT to have the skeleton hands and Bond bracelet? Those have been integral features of the SMP Diver since it was first introduced. Altering those, removing the helium valve (although I agree that it looks like a Reese's), or changing the case would simply turn this into a fundamentally different watch altogether. Kind of like saying that you love hamburgers, except for the beef, the toppings, and the bun. You can love the hands and bracelet or hate them. (In fact, I don't think I've ever found anyone to be indifferent to them.) But I think they're here to stay.
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
Those have been integral features of the SMP Diver since it was first introduced. Altering those ...
For nearly a glorious decade they have been not. Looking back in nostalgia:
31373648xb.jpg
 
Posts
1,695
Likes
5,406
For nearly a glorious decade they have been not. Looking back in nostalgia:
31373648xb.jpg
The Blake and Bond versions were produced and sold simultaneously. The Blake version, beautiful as it is, was obviously never intended to supplant the Bond version. What Omega could do is consider bringing back an update of the Blake; but I think it highly unlikely that they would discontinue the Bond version entirely in favor of a new Blake.
 
Posts
270
Likes
970
The Blake and Bond versions were produced and sold simultaneously. The Blake version, beautiful as it is, was obviously never intended to supplant the Bond version. What Omega could do is consider bringing back an update of the Blake; but I think it highly unlikely that they would discontinue the Bond version entirely in favor of a new Blake.
However the Blake version is a SMP Diver, wasn't it? That's all I was saying.
 
Posts
1,695
Likes
5,406
However the Blake version is a SMP Diver, wasn't it? That's all I was saying.
Indeed it was. And frankly, they should bring it back in some form. Peter Blake was a bona fide oceanographer and explorer; James Bond, not so much!
 
Posts
1,802
Likes
10,155
I think the waves are way to bold on all but one or two color dials. Not a fan of the skeleton hands either.
 
Posts
221
Likes
283
He is sporting the non-LE Railmaster 馃榾
I was going to ask what the hell hes wearing, for a second I thought older AT, with the rio swim lane strap.

But it鈥檚 a two tone NATO, and no idea with the face yet. Probably the Rail like you said.


*edit, picture attached of the RM he鈥檚 wearing.
Edited:
 
Posts
1,695
Likes
5,406
Not to change the subject, but that is one of the oddest looking knots I have ever seen on a necktie.
 
Posts
2,042
Likes
5,481
Though I prefer the older Blake wave dials, I'm dithering over whether the new iteration or the Rio 2016 Olympic Limited Edition wave execution would take second place (a distant second place mind you 馃槈).
 
Posts
818
Likes
3,126
Are you planning to use this watch for diving? Won鈥檛 the laser etched waves make reading the dial even more difficult as you approach 300m underwater?
This new one, no, I won'd be buying one. But my (now previous generation) SMP 300, sure. Yes I have a dive computer, but I always wear a mechanical dive watch as a backup.
 
Posts
52
Likes
141


I have a soft spot for the Seamaster Professional, as it was my first "real" watch. I've owned at least seven of them, including Bond models (quartz and automatic), ceramic ones, sword hands ones (2254/2255), etc., but eventually flipped them for the beauty of the Planet Ocean (of which I now own three). My daily wearer is the 39.5 PO with the 8800 movement.

My reaction to this new SMP is really mixed. The HE valve is the worst part about it. Cartoonishly large. It also now lines up with the 10:00 marker; a small point, but this was a pretty handy way of spotting fake SMPs in the past.

The lume-filled indices on the new model also seem considerably larger in proportion to the dial than the previous models, kind of like a Seiko Sumo diver, which I think gives up a little of the subtlety of the previous model but makes it more "toolish." I think this model will be harder to "pull off with a suit" than previous models because of the larger and more prominent white indices.

With the larger indices everywhere else, and the huge ones at 12:00, the indices kind of give the visual sensation of a circle with a hole in the bottom. The 6:00 date works better on the new AT or the Globemaster, to my eyes at least, than this model.

On the wave dial, I agree with others, this must be seen to be fully evaluated.

The 8800 movement and micro adjustment clasp are definite positives. This one also has more "U-Shaped" bracelet end links that angle down almost 90 degrees from the lugs, just like the newer PO 39.5. From a fit standpoint, they are definitely a positive for the PO 39.5, as they let the bracelet more easily curve around the wrist without gaps around the lugs. That might help blunt the impact of the slight increase in case diameter.

At this point, not seeing a lot of reason why one would pick this over a Planet Ocean 39.5, which has the same movement but is a step up, and can be bought LNIB used for around $4K.
Edited:
 
Posts
230
Likes
195
If the intention of the new shape of the helium valve is to up the watch' diver's credentials, how about ditching the scalloped bezel? That thing is downright impossible to turn when wet or when wearing gloves. Looks great though 馃槈
That scalloped edge is the biggest reason I鈥檝e never liked this model. Makes the watch look defective to my eyes as it moves and the variable edge catches the light. I know I鈥檓 unusual in my lack of love for this model (and I鈥檓 not in love with the sub either...)

I was just handling a 2254 thinking how perfect it is only to fiddle with it trying to turn that scalloped bezel! I will say that on the SMPc or even the 2534 it is easier to turn and this one will probably follow suit. There is a bit of a trick to turning the bezel but I never get it right on the 2254. In a way I see it as a plus since it is more difficult to turn it without intending to.