Im still here, population 496 yeah these watches were made for people who worked with their hands for a living. This is what made the brand so famous but these second generation owners I dont know, they seem a bit precious. I spent the day splitting dry wood, I wonder what they did?
After reading through this - there’s some sound advice, which I agree with and actually retract my initial comment about splitting it for parts.
the non-bezel is a brilliant idea also.
After reading TRF comments, I don't blame the OP for getting second opinion here. As people said above, restore it and wear it. Looks like putting service parts from Rolex will be a cheaper alternative to sourcing original, period correct parts.
Good luck and don't forget to post some pictures after watch goes back to life.
Interesting/great watch.
My personal take in this situation would be that the watch earned these scars and scratches whilst strapped to my dads wrist and I'd want to strike a balance between preserving that and making it useable.
As SF said the main goal should be:
1. full movement service
2. thorough clean of the case no polishing or refinishing (especially of the caseback)
3. new gaskets and crystal to make it as waterproof as possible.
Then you're into the subjective areas:
4. Dial - I can see the calls for a relume but I'd be tempted to leave as is (unless you think much of the degradation occurred in storage). Ultimately I'd want to be looking down and seeing the same face my dad did in the last few years he wore it.
5. Hands - as above.
6. Bezel - if you've found the original, regardless of condition I'd use that. I do think Subs/GMTs look great with no bezel though.
Good luck. Show us the finished job.
