- Posts
- 97
- Likes
- 17
Ask for help about 561 constellation
- Posts
- 5,447
- Likes
- 9,325
BlackTalon
··This Space for RentI thought MOY could be okay, but the minute track is all over the place. Touching the 'break' from 4 to 7, but very far away from 10 to 2.
- Posts
- 97
- Likes
- 17
lennylee
·I thought MOY could be okay, but the minute track is all over the place. Touching the 'break' from 4 to 7, but very far away from 10 to 2.
maybe at a different angle ？
- Posts
- 4,965
- Likes
- 18,429
Shabbaz
·Well. I understand what some members are saying but I still would say this is a original dial. The 168.005 came in a lot of dial variants. Sometimes they passed the moy test but a lot of times they did'nt. Sometimes the spacing was small, sometimes wide. You see the curly n's but also the more flat n's. The minute track is a bit inconsistent. But omega was inconsistent as well. Just looking at the dial in general I would say it's ok. Anyway, it's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
- Posts
- 97
- Likes
- 17
lennylee
·Well. I understand what some members are saying but I still would say this is a original dial. The 168.005 came in a lot of dial variants. Sometimes they passed the moy test but a lot of times they did'nt. Sometimes the spacing was small, sometimes wide. You see the curly n's but also the more flat n's. The minute track is a bit inconsistent. But omega was inconsistent as well. Just looking at the dial in general I would say it's ok. Anyway, it's just my opinion. I could be wrong.
thank you！
and how about the bands？ it is also original？
- Posts
- 5,636
- Likes
- 5,793
SkunkPrince
·thank you！
and how about the bands？ it is also original？
