Are omega (swatch group) struggling?

Posts
13,122
Likes
17,996
You are aware that the US dollar has depreciated almost 20% against the Swiss franc from 2020 to 2024, right?

https://www.exchange-rates.org/exchange-rate-history/chf-usd#history-table

It is no wonder that less well-known Swatch brands are struggling, along with other marginal Swiss brands. When your largest market's prices have to go up 20% just to return the same amount of francs to the mother ship, there are going to be issues. Currency hedging can only go so far.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,586
Likes
2,870
You are aware that the US dollar has depreciated almost 20% against the Swiss franc from 2020 to 2024, right?

https://www.exchange-rates.org/exchange-rate-history/chf-usd#history-table

It is no wonder that less well-known Swatch brands are struggling, along with other marginal Swiss brands. When your largest market's prices have to go up 20% just to return the same amount of francs to the mother ship, there are going to be issues. Currency hedging can only go so far.
gatorcpa
Probably explains a decent portion of the price increases besides just inflation.
 
Posts
6,016
Likes
20,688
You are aware that the US dollar has depreciated almost 20% against the Swiss franc from 2020 to 2024, right?

https://www.exchange-rates.org/exchange-rate-history/chf-usd#history-table

It is no wonder that less well-known Swatch brands are struggling, along with other marginal Swiss brands. When your largest market's prices have to go up 20% just to return the same amount of francs to the mother ship, there are going to be issues. Currency hedging can only go so far.
gatorcpa

While the value of the CHF is not in Omega's control, the exchange rate is much controlled by the Swiss government. Switzerland has a large import market so likes a strong currency to lower those costs. They know that their big exports of watches will be more costly, which is also a good thing provided they don't tip the scale so much that purchases of watches decrease.

I don't believe Omega has a seat at the Swiss Treasury but I don't believe that Omega or any Swiss manufacturer is without influence.
 
Posts
2,067
Likes
4,210
I'm sure they would. Still doesn't mean it's mystical/mythical...

I too can pretend to always have something to say to make me look profound. I just don't have fanbois clicking the like button on all my posts. 🙄

MY OBVIOUS POINT (maybe only to me) is that Rolex WANTS people to think it's this way. Not that it really is this way.
 
Posts
13,122
Likes
17,996
... provided they don't tip the scale so much that purchases of watches decrease.
Which is exactly what is happening to smaller brands.

The depreciation on these are so high, that you'd be much better served putting more money into a Rolex regardless of the relative quality of the watches. At least you'll have something of value because of the superior financial support that Rolex marketing provides.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
6,327
Likes
9,917
Wow this is a cliquey forum. Very unwelcoming.
Don’t edit like this.
 
Posts
29,218
Likes
75,506
I too can pretend to always have something to say to make me look profound. I just don't have fanbois clicking the like button on all my posts. 🙄

MY OBVIOUS POINT (maybe only to me) is that Rolex WANTS people to think it's this way. Not that it really is this way.

Of course that's what they want - otherwise they wouldn't spend millions telling people it's special.

 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,721
MY OBVIOUS POINT (maybe only to me) is that Rolex WANTS people to think it's this way. Not that it really is this way.

I think most of us see it, or the discussion wouldn't have come up at all. I have literally had casual, uneducated people tell me that Rolex uses the BEST steel that exists.
 
Posts
6,016
Likes
20,688
I just don't have fanbois clicking the like button on all my posts. 🙄

....

Can't I like both of you? 😁
 
Posts
29,218
Likes
75,506
I think most of us see it, or the discussion wouldn't have come up at all. I have literally had casual, uneducated people tell me that Rolex uses the BEST steel that exists.

Before I was "into" watches, just being a regular old engineer, I worked with a lot of different materials including stainless steels. When I first heard of the magical 904L being used on Rolex watches, the first thought was "so what?"

Couple of years ago I visited a fabrication shop where one of my former engineering colleagues now works. They make fittings and seals for piping - they use a lot of 904L. There are bars of it laying outside in their yard - not locked up or protected in any way. Rolex would have you think it's a precious metal, but that just bullshit. They prey on uneducated people...and it works.
 
Posts
7,635
Likes
21,906

This is an interesting article. While it’s clear a strong Swiss franc must increase prices overseas, it’s also true that Swatch is much more vulnerable to world economic downturns than other watchmakers because it has a very broad portfolio of brands which cater to the « regular people » and not just to luxury buyers.

It’s become quite clear that the top 0.1% in our world now have accumulated so much cash that their buying power in the luxury segment is immune from crisis. Contrary to the middle class buyers of Swatches mid and low tier brands.

It is worth remembering the history of Swatch. it was formed through the merger of two major Swiss watchmaking conglomerates, and the launch of a cheap and quirky watch designed to beat the Japanese competition on the segment for cheaper watches.
That plan to save a vast array of Swiss brands was sponsored by the Swiss government and the Swiss banking industry.

So indeed the fate of Swatch group has broad stakes for the Swiss economy at large, goes way beyond lining the pockets of some wealthy stakeholders, and preserving it is a much complex affair than to save manufactures which only cater to the most wealthy people on earth.

It’s also why I kind of like the Swatch group. They saved an entire industry through extreme ingenuity, and they did it with the public interest in mind. They had to create strategies for very different brands. And I also like that Nick Hayek had the guts to slam the door on the extremely arrogant Basel World.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,721
Before I was "into" watches, just being a regular old engineer, I worked with a lot of different materials including stainless steels. When I first heard of the magical 904L being used on Rolex watches, the first thought was "so what?"

Couple of years ago I visited a fabrication shop where one of my former engineering colleagues now works. They make fittings and seals for piping - they use a lot of 904L. There are bars of it laying outside in their yard - not locked up or protected in any way. Rolex would have you think it's a precious metal, but that just bullshit. They prey on uneducated people...and it works.

Exactly. And I think this is where the root of this disagreement came from, you're stating the fact that it isn't special and @RevZMan123 is stating what the marketing is. We all agree that the marketing is BS.

Especially the instagram, reddit, Twitter, cryptocurrency Rolex fans, eat that stuff up like it's fact. Ignorance is an amazing and sometimes untreatable malady.
Edited:
 
Posts
13,122
Likes
17,996
Ignorance is an amazing and sometimes untreatable malady.
Ain’t that the truth!

All I have to do is watch the nightly news to see that in action.
gatorcpa
 
Posts
2,674
Likes
4,529
So quality would be the only factor that decides on the tier? Then Seiko, Tudor, Omega, Rolex, Longiness, … are all in the same playing field?

I’m not saying that brand equity is the only criterium worth considering, but it’s definitely an important one.
Only to plastic posers and investor wankers!
 
Posts
3,048
Likes
32,391
Nick Hyack tells investors “my way or the highway”

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...yst-call-pits-ceo-against-financial-community

Today Swatch Group said investors were seeking privileged information from a company that argues it’s in the business of selling “watches, not shares.”

The Swiss watchmaker told Bloomberg that investors who complained about its level of disclosure on a heated call Tuesday did so because they want “confidential information just for themselves,” saying, “that’s an absolute no-go for us.”

During the call Hyack told the analysts that if they didn’t like his management style they were free to sell UHR SW and invest elsewhere.
 
Posts
3,652
Likes
7,721
Looks like investors did exactly this several days ago judging from the chart; vs prior day avol, ran 23X volume, and was a big enough move that it DOUBLED the 28 day average volume. Next day ran 10X the new average volume- down. I don't think I've ever looked at Swatch group, very thinly traded and I'd guess it's trading on a European exchange in addition to an American one (looks OTC here, data from SWGAY. I'm guessing it----v looks like it trades on SWX/SIX as ticker UHR).

I'm trying to figure out why Niedzielski had ~120,000USD position, even being as small as 0.11% of his 109M AUM. Definitely a case where I want to own the watch, not the chart.

During the call Hyack told the analysts that if they didn’t like his management style they were free to sell UHR SW and invest elsewhere.
Edited: