Spacefruit
··Prolific Speedmaster HoarderI have not seen AQ's sale discussed elsewhere. I did post a little review on my site.here
Link to auction here
I was expecting the assembled 145.022-69 to face plant, but I was surprised to see the two others fail to sell,
I am only talking about the three pre 78's
First was Lot 158,
an assembled 145.022-69 with an incorrect movement and dial, $16,750 at the low estimate incl premium. It failed to get a bid.
Next was lot176
which I quite liked as an attractive cheaper example, all correct 145.022-71 which would cost $6125 including premium
. Now this is not a bargain, and like all auctions we can get a bit battered price wise and when we see a lower price we can be fooled into thinking its a bargain. I am not saying this is a bargain, but the watch does have a kind of integrity and honesty not often seen in auction watches. As a package, with the 1039 bracelet, I am surprised it did not find a home at this level.
Last was this, Lot 177
Again I was surprised this did not find a home at the price asked, $8,750 incl. I could not find any 105.012 listed for sale under $10k that wasn't a dogs breakfast.
None of these watches was a bargain. But the last two were not crazy. Especially for auction. But they were of lower quality than seen in many auctions, more like ebay watches, and they might have fetched $2,000 less on Ebay, which by a strange coincidence is about the commission AQ wanted to take.
So questions:
Is Speedmaster market falling, ie, less buyers? Or are buyers more discerning?
Were these the wrong watches for a big Auction house, or too much money? What else could we find on the market for less, or the same money and better quality?
Did AQ fail to sell these as people were uncomfortable buying these without handling?
Did AQ fail to reach buyers, that is did people not know about the auction?
Did the political situation make a difference?

Link to auction here
I was expecting the assembled 145.022-69 to face plant, but I was surprised to see the two others fail to sell,
I am only talking about the three pre 78's
First was Lot 158,
an assembled 145.022-69 with an incorrect movement and dial, $16,750 at the low estimate incl premium. It failed to get a bid.
Next was lot176
which I quite liked as an attractive cheaper example, all correct 145.022-71 which would cost $6125 including premium
. Now this is not a bargain, and like all auctions we can get a bit battered price wise and when we see a lower price we can be fooled into thinking its a bargain. I am not saying this is a bargain, but the watch does have a kind of integrity and honesty not often seen in auction watches. As a package, with the 1039 bracelet, I am surprised it did not find a home at this level.
Last was this, Lot 177
Again I was surprised this did not find a home at the price asked, $8,750 incl. I could not find any 105.012 listed for sale under $10k that wasn't a dogs breakfast.
None of these watches was a bargain. But the last two were not crazy. Especially for auction. But they were of lower quality than seen in many auctions, more like ebay watches, and they might have fetched $2,000 less on Ebay, which by a strange coincidence is about the commission AQ wanted to take.
So questions:
Is Speedmaster market falling, ie, less buyers? Or are buyers more discerning?
Were these the wrong watches for a big Auction house, or too much money? What else could we find on the market for less, or the same money and better quality?
Did AQ fail to sell these as people were uncomfortable buying these without handling?
Did AQ fail to reach buyers, that is did people not know about the auction?
Did the political situation make a difference?

Edited: