Spacefruit
··Prolific Speedmaster HoarderLink to Speedmaster Listings here
Starts off sensible:
With the 1039 bracelet and 516 endlinks, this watch might have been a great pickup.
I am aware the bezel and hand condition are poor, but the overall watch for the price is good. HKD 40,000 is USD $5,100. Show me another -71 on the market for that price, that you would rather have.
Next is an amazing price for a 145.012:
This is a standard 145.012 as far as I can see, with an extract. HKD 400,000 is $51,200. Is this a typo?
The only explanation I can think of is that someone applied for an extract using the photo of an Ultraman, as the serial is very close, (though not inside) the proposed accepted range. See here.
Note the wrong bezel
Next we have another problematic watch, with non original parts, an Omega document, and a price that is double that of the last known sale for a correct, perfect example:
This sold for twice the estimate, and at HKD237,000 is equivalent to USD just over USD $30,000.
It is a transitional, and comes with a certificate of authenticity. I am shocked that this is what Omega are doing, which is basically legitimizing a franken watch.
This watch carries a non original movement, and a non original bezel. That this has been "blessed" by an Omega document, begs the question, what is that document worth in the future?
Nothing.
Note incorrect bezel.
Here is an Ultraman that at least appears genuine, if an All Time High price.
At HKD 812,500 this is USD $104,160 - is this a record for an Ultraman?
If I had to fall on one side or another, I would say the Orange hand is from the Alps of Vietnam. It is way to clean and perfect, compared to the rest of the watch.
It just did not seem very attractive, but Ultra-fever won through.
Look at the hand - It is clean, and flat. It just looks out of place to me - the rest of the watch is tired
It doesnt stop
Ed White Owners will all be re calibrating values....
At HKD 812,500 again this is $104,160. Again I ask myself, are these typo's?
The dial is a snowflake dial. Thats not a good thing.
So can someone confirm if these prices were real, or is there an AQ intern being flogged for writing in the wrong prices?
Starts off sensible:
With the 1039 bracelet and 516 endlinks, this watch might have been a great pickup.
I am aware the bezel and hand condition are poor, but the overall watch for the price is good. HKD 40,000 is USD $5,100. Show me another -71 on the market for that price, that you would rather have.
Next is an amazing price for a 145.012:
This is a standard 145.012 as far as I can see, with an extract. HKD 400,000 is $51,200. Is this a typo?
The only explanation I can think of is that someone applied for an extract using the photo of an Ultraman, as the serial is very close, (though not inside) the proposed accepted range. See here.
Note the wrong bezel
Next we have another problematic watch, with non original parts, an Omega document, and a price that is double that of the last known sale for a correct, perfect example:
This sold for twice the estimate, and at HKD237,000 is equivalent to USD just over USD $30,000.
It is a transitional, and comes with a certificate of authenticity. I am shocked that this is what Omega are doing, which is basically legitimizing a franken watch.
This watch carries a non original movement, and a non original bezel. That this has been "blessed" by an Omega document, begs the question, what is that document worth in the future?
Nothing.
Note incorrect bezel.
Here is an Ultraman that at least appears genuine, if an All Time High price.
At HKD 812,500 this is USD $104,160 - is this a record for an Ultraman?
If I had to fall on one side or another, I would say the Orange hand is from the Alps of Vietnam. It is way to clean and perfect, compared to the rest of the watch.
It just did not seem very attractive, but Ultra-fever won through.
Look at the hand - It is clean, and flat. It just looks out of place to me - the rest of the watch is tired
It doesnt stop
Ed White Owners will all be re calibrating values....
At HKD 812,500 again this is $104,160. Again I ask myself, are these typo's?
The dial is a snowflake dial. Thats not a good thing.
So can someone confirm if these prices were real, or is there an AQ intern being flogged for writing in the wrong prices?
Edited:










