scapa
·Let’s be sensible Omega is far better than Tudor. The movement in Omega is better than Rolex amongst other things.
The Rolex oyster bracelet could be argued although rattling, looks better.
IDK about that. I love my Omegas, but my Pelagos and BB58 are both more accurate across positions than any of my 8800 or 8900-based watches have been, with a longer PR. Sure, magnetism is reduced still further with the coax movements, but not sure I see the benefit in real-world conditions, and I'm on wards with plenty of mag triggers everyday.
Back when a Pelagos cost CAD 4700.00 on the bracelet and a 300m Diver ran CAD 5k-ish I'd have said the Omega was a superior value given the relative complexity of the case / dial / bezel, movement and brand history.
Now that same Omega runs CAD 7800.00 and the Tudor 5700.00 -- and I'd take the Pelagos every time. And wonder how Tudor has managed to keep the Pelagos in its relative value position. Especially since that same 300m sells in 2023 pretty much what I sold mine for in 2021. That's a heckuva haircut if you don't love the watch.
This strikes me as less about price hikes necessary to defray increased costs and more about repositioning the brand(s) relentlessly upmarket. We're seeing the same thing with Longines, I suppose, although at least it started from a more reasonable price point.