1963 Constellation 168.005_SP

Posts
8
Likes
2
I recently purchased a 1963 Omega Constellation black dial (see attached). The inside of the back case shows ref. 168.005_SP. What does 'SP' mean ?

In addition, I note the finish seems to be bead blasted. Not seen this before.

Any thoughts please ?
 
Posts
216
Likes
238
SP = SPECIAL = REDIAL

Wow, do you think so? What gave it away? I kinda found the dial pretty fine but definitely feel that we need more pictures from different angles to be sure.
 
Posts
1,555
Likes
3,649
I just did, interesting discussion. But to me it seems inconclusive, given that even the veteran OF members don't seem to fully agree on what SP means, no?
Sometimes life is like that. If you can solve it conclusively then feel free to try
 
Posts
205
Likes
1,299
Sometimes life is like that. If you can solve it conclusively then feel free to try
That sounds like a lot of work. I think I’ll take a nap instead.
 
Posts
1,852
Likes
5,380
Wow, do you think so? What gave it away? I kinda found the dial pretty fine but definitely feel that we need more pictures from different angles to be sure.
The painted white minute markers are not aligned with the metal markers.
 
Posts
216
Likes
238
The painted white minute markers are not aligned with the metal markers.
Now that sounds like an interesting observation that slipped from my attention. My impression was that the photo angle wouldn't allow for a clear judgement but that issue is certainly not out of the table.
 
Posts
20,040
Likes
46,656
Almost certainly a redial, but it would be desirable to see a straight-on photo.
 
Posts
5,433
Likes
8,457
The listing makes no claim regarding dial originality - only that the dial is black (and that the pictures are an important part of the sales listing)

I'm afraid, I too think the dial is repainted - due to the alignment of the text and the quality of the minute haches -but a a good in-focus pic of the dial would help to assess the dial properly.
However, the text is done reasonably well and the case is pretty good, so the watch will still wear well on the wrist.

Odd that the caseback has no perlaging - don't think I've seen his before on a mid-60s dogleg.
 
Posts
824
Likes
1,444
Is the dot over the I missing? Marker 29 seems off. Pretty good redial I would say.
 
Posts
824
Likes
1,444
I didn't see the seller claim an original unaltered dial. Some buyer may not be too pleased.
 
Posts
7,827
Likes
56,871
I didn't see the seller claim an original unaltered dial. Some buyer may not be too pleased.


The “some buyer” is the OP

and, what does he think now???
 
Posts
824
Likes
1,444
The “some buyer” is the OP

and, what does he think now???
Oh yeah, he bought before asking us.🤔
 
Posts
5
Likes
21
It’s actually not a bad example for a redial.. but yeah too expensive.