145.006 / 145.016 Seamaster Chronograph Research Thread

Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
Reading these topics, it looks like minimum half a dozen forum members have done interesting research, bringing out new figures & facts that one should expect to come from the Omega History/Heritage team... but the latter are restrained by strategic commercial reasons I suppose ? 😁

They simply can’t be dancing at every party. In parallel. But if one wants to spend some time with them to share / cross-check own findings, they take the time - you know it 😉
 
Posts
891
Likes
1,656
kov kov
Ok this is beautiful but really out of scope here 😜
I know it's 1872 and not a 1873, I've not got one either as the cheeky @Northernman bought it. As I too NEED this one.

BTW @kov thanks for your stunning work and to all others who have contributed thank you too. I am tempted to drift again but will stay on target.
Sadly until I get a 9655 I'll fear I can only add questions and will hold of further drift until I can provide physical examples.

P
 
Posts
4,436
Likes
18,222
I know it's 1872 and not a 1873, I've not got one either as the cheeky @Northernman bought it. As I too NEED this one.

BTW @kov thanks for your stunning work and to all others who have contributed thank you too. I am tempted to drift again but will stay on target.
Sadly until I get a 9655 I'll fear I can only add questions and will hold of further drift until I can provide physical examples.

P
😁
I’ll leave the next one for you @tapaptpat ! Promise!😗
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
So I managed to source a 145.006-66 with what I called a Silver radial dial with thin indexes :



- Soleil Silver dial
- Applied logo
- Radial sub counters
- Long thin applied indexes with tritium dots at outside edges
- Integrated tachymètre scale
- Chrome hour and minute hands with a tritium track and a black track
- Orange chrono hand (18.20mm)
- Chrome sub counter hands

That case was polished but the rest is good, especially the cal 321 is in a perfect shape. I will make better photographs of this wonderful soleil dial asap.

--> First reference post updated accordingly.
Edited:
 
Posts
230
Likes
319
Can anyone explain to me how this reference obtain the "Jedi" moniker?
I apologize in advance for disrupting this great thread, but Ken G’s comment made me do it!

I have a 145.024 “Jedi” with a circular brushed case. I bought it knowing that the sunburst finish was correct, but I really liked the look of the circular. As Ken G mentions, the Flightmaster and MkIII were offered with both finishes, and were of similar chronological vintage (1970/71) as the 145.024. Additionally, the Seamaster 166.093 1000m diver also seems to have been supplied with either finish (also circa 1970).

At any rate, it’s interesting that Omega offered options on case finishing at all. I would still believe that my Jedi met up with a refinishing wheel at some point, but I’d now say that it’s at least historically representative of what was going on at the time.

 
Posts
563
Likes
1,250
Can anyone explain to me how this reference obtain the "Jedi" moniker?

The name came from the late great Omega documenter Chuck Maddox, who was apparently a Star Wars fan as well. He also generated the nicknames “Anakin” and “Darth Vader” for other Omega models.

You can read a compendium of this writings on chronomaddox.com
 
Posts
230
Likes
319
Thanks! I heard about about this Chuck Maddox guy here and there, but do not know him in detail. I will check out your link. Thanks!
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,956
Interesting. That's probably the first Omega I've seen where the hands have lume, but the dial hasn't.
Thoughts, anyone?
It's actually not uncommonly seen for an Omega dial to say T but has no lume on it. Majority of them are in pristine condition like this one.
 
Posts
9,595
Likes
27,663
It's actually not uncommonly seen for an Omega dial to say T but has no lume on it. Majority of them are in pristine condition like this one.

But the lumed hands? Any photos of these?
 
Posts
2,876
Likes
1,956
But the lumed hands? Any photos of these?
The lume hands are to match with the T. There sure are photos of quite a few examples around, even here on OF, I'll look them up.
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
Another interesting variation of the very early 321 reverse panda radial dial observed.



For future reference.

--> First reference post updated accordingly.
 
Posts
435
Likes
978
The issue with this post is now I have identified another bunch of watches that I have to find and then buy... Where will it all end?!?!?!
 
Posts
360
Likes
746
This is a thread to follow and save. Plenty great information here, thank you OP and OF!
 
Posts
222
Likes
621
Here is my black panda 145.016 on the left. It has a circular case finish. On the right a 145.029 blue panda.
 
Posts
402
Likes
1,193
kov kov
Another 145.016 variation is what I am calling a Reverse Panda radial dial :



- Black dial with white sub-counters (R)
- Printed logo
- Radial sub counters
- Long tritium indexes
- Integrated tachymètre scale on a white background
- White hour and minute hands with a tritium track
- Orange chrono hand (18.20mm)
- Black sub counter hands



It seems this dial was also fitted on the 145.006 references with cal. 321 but I haven't seen any, yet. Does anybody have one?

--> First reference post updated accordingly.

Think I like this one the most. Somebody trade for my Mint Soccer Timer ?
 
Posts
4,113
Likes
16,307
Think I like this one the most. Somebody trade for my Mint Soccer Timer ?

I must say it's my preferred dial from the regular ones, too. Would love to find it with a 321 inside though 😀
 
Posts
563
Likes
1,250
Looks pretty good overall - dial looks nice, movement looks clean. I tend to be skeptical of the 20 micron plating, but no obvious cracks or worn areas. What’s the size of the case?
 
Posts
10
Likes
3
The case is 34mm. I thought the crown is supposed to be the same colour as the case?