Your thoughts on this Genève model please

Posts
28
Likes
13
...what are your thoughts on this lovely Genève? How does it look to you? Anything suspicious?
Heaps of thanks for your expertise!!


 
Posts
28
Likes
13
My apologies for the unfinished (first) post; should have typed from the computer, not the phone.
Hello to everyone, I am new to this forum and a historian from Switzerland with great love, but not (yet) equally great knowledge, of Omega watches. Thanks for your help.
 
Posts
1,534
Likes
3,234
The alignment of several lume dots is off. The Omega logo looks incorrect, as does the font. It is a redial IMHO. The case is polished, as well. Avoid this.
 
Posts
28
Likes
13
This ones polished as well, I take it? There’s no photo of the movements, which puts me off.

 
Posts
28
Likes
13
The scratch on the glass doesn’t worry me, but should it??
 
Posts
6,486
Likes
50,054
Bit more severe than a scratch. That crystal is damaged. It either took a knock or almost appears more like somebody tried to pry the crystal out.
 
Posts
8,324
Likes
68,267
This ones polished as well, I take it? There’s no photo of the movements, which puts me off.

Is it a ladies watch - there’s no second hand
 
Posts
8,324
Likes
68,267
...what are your thoughts on this lovely Genève? How does it look to you? Anything suspicious?
Heaps of thanks for your expertise!!


Photos aren’t great and the crown looks wrong
 
Posts
28
Likes
13
Thanks all. What’s wrong with the crown (for me to learn)? Yes, it’s a ladies watch. I am a lady myself and find it very beautiful. But I am also a museums curator and historian (thus always sceptical 😉) and something puts me off. However, I can’t tell. Just a guts feeling. But you have the knowledge and I am keen to learn.
 
Posts
1,534
Likes
3,234
The crown is too long and rounded like it has been polished, as well.
 
Posts
8,324
Likes
68,267
You’d be surprised how many (new) male posters ask about watches like your second one, not realising they’re smaller ‘ladies’ watches.

But, so far as your first watch is concerned I’m a huge fan of this style of case 165.041 or 166.041. I think they’re lovely shape and fit although I prefer the automatic models with the 552 or 565 movements. If you look at the two photos I’ve attached, you’ll note the difference between your crown and mine. Mine are a little slimmer with a convex tip

Edited:
 
Posts
28
Likes
13
I agree, they are both terrific watches. Thanks for sharing. I don’t own this watch but intend to buy one further along the road. However, for now I am just observing and trying to learn. There is no rush. I know how much attention goes to detail with so called “vintage” things.
 
Posts
28
Likes
13
Out of pure curiosity I just did some research on models without a second hand and found this.
 
Posts
28
Likes
13
So, the take home lesson for today would be that this one would be the better option compared to the first one I posted:
Not great photos thought. Too much of a shadow hiding part of the dial. But not as shiny and polished as the first one, right?
 
Posts
8,324
Likes
68,267
So, the take home lesson for today would be that this one would be the better option compared to the first one I posted:
Not great photos thought. Too much of a shadow hiding part of the dial. But not as shiny and polished as the first one, right?
That’s very nice. I’m not sure about the crown but it looks better than the earlier Genève.
I’m assuming it’s a 565 movement. These are fairly easy to service (£100-125 in the UK) and movement parts readily available (I’m told). Your dial, hands and case look good and I prefer the embossed ‘Omega’ badge to the printed version.
Assuming the price is okay, and the movement reasonable then it’s an attractive option
 
Posts
8,324
Likes
68,267
Actually, on a closer inspection, there are some stains between 5-7 and 9-11 that might bear closer scrutiny
 
Posts
415
Likes
1,088
As Spruce stated the last one you posted looks correct. Here’s my take on the 041s: They’re relatively plentiful and relatively inexpensive, so you can be picky with these. Personally the green aging of the lume in the last post is a bit of a deal breaker. I’d want something creamier. And yes, I know that’s being picky, but as I said, this is an easier reference to find. Good luck!
 
Posts
8,324
Likes
68,267
As Spruce stated the last one you posted looks correct. Here’s my take on the 041s: They’re relatively plentiful and relatively inexpensive, so you can be picky with these. Personally the green aging of the lume in the last post is a bit of a deal breaker. I’d want something creamier. And yes, I know that’s being picky, but as I said, this is an easier reference to find. Good luck!
I think you’re right to the extent that the late 60s/early 70s models are perceived as being less desirable than the Seamasters from the same period and, when I first started on Omega they were less expensive despite having the same movements but, in recent times, they’ve become more collectible and more expensive. Although you can still find reasonable deals, these .041s have crept up in price.
 
Posts
5,636
Likes
5,800
I wonder if you might be happy with a 50X series Seamaster? Those aren't super-expensive and I would say they are a very lady-friendly size at 34mm diameter. I think their dials and hands are more interesting, personally. They will cost more than a Genève, though.