Vintage LeCoultre Master Mariner Automatic

Posts
558
Likes
1,047
I couldn't resist this one. It seems to be from the late '50s or early '60s with the 476-3 bumper automatic movement. The case is solid gold and screw back. I love waterproof/rugged/dressy all at once.

JohnCote

LeCoultre-MMAuto-Dial.jpg

LeCoultre-MMAuto-All.jpg
 
Posts
200
Likes
405
Wow! Just gorgeous. Look at those lugs! And you got the box and papers? Surely a rare bird there. I can see why resistance was futile.
 
Posts
29
Likes
63
That is absolutely beautiful, congratulations on a quality aquisition the B&P are really the icing on the cake....................
 
Posts
12,939
Likes
51,711
I want to say "great catch!" I hate to look the proverbial gift horse in the mouth but I'm struggling with the dial. Sub dial printing is not consistent or consistent with images on Google. Minute markers seem a bit haphazard. Might be the pics or the angle. Deperately want to be wrong ....thoughts? I think this a redial.
Edited:
 
Posts
3,456
Likes
7,943
I think this a redial
Don't know jack about JLC but wondering how the dial would need refinishing when the rest of the watch is so pure?
Larry, no disputes with your observations, I'd just love to see some more "MASTER MARINER" font examples.

Hello, Google!
 
Posts
3,456
Likes
7,943
Man, hard to find with subdials...
They do all seem to have heavy font thickness on MASTER MARINER.
Can you point out your concerns, Larry? I'm having trouble seeing them.
 
Posts
558
Likes
1,047
I want to say "great catch!" I hate to look the proverbial gift horse in the mouth but I'm struggling with the dial. Sub dial printing is not consistent or consistent with images on Google. Minute markers seem a bit haphazard. Might be the pics or the angle. Deperately want to be wrong ....thoughts? I think this a redial.

I wish you could look at the watch with a loupe. I thought the "Master Mariner" font above the sub-dial looked odd but it is done in the same ink/paint/enamel as the rest of the print and there are other MM dials with this same incongruity. The minute markers are perfectly aligned. Also there is a bit of "patina" in the center of the dial which is hard to see in the photo.

I have been buying watches for 40+ years and, although I still make mistakes...I don't think this is one of them. I never say with 100% surety that a dial is right...but 98%...this dial is right.

JohnCote
 
Posts
558
Likes
1,047
You guys made me a bit paranoid so I did go look at the dial with a loupe. For me one of the tell-tale signs that a dial with raised gold markers has been repainted is paint on the sides of the markers. There is no sign of it on this dial. The writing is very perfect with all of the proper little serifs on the LeCoultre script. There is no pooled paint in the little ridges between the dial plate and the tiny raised gold minute markers. If this dial has been re-done it was done better than most factory dials. If it has been redone it is good enough for me...but it has not...again...98% been re-done.

JohnCote
 
Posts
3,456
Likes
7,943
You guys
Hey, I'm with you John!
Of course, I'm wrong more than right so that should really make you nervous!
 
Posts
558
Likes
1,047
Hey, I'm with you John!
Of course, I'm wrong more than right so that should really make you nervous!

It's always worth checking. Nothing wrong with a little paranoia. Paranoia pays off when buying vintage watches.

JC
 
Posts
12,939
Likes
51,711
Here is one... finer printing
 
Posts
12,939
Likes
51,711
Don't forget that JLC was pegged as primarily a movement maker .. I think their vintage is largely underrated.
 
Posts
558
Likes
1,047
Don't forget that JLC was pegged as primarily a movement maker .. I think their vintage is largely underrated.

I agree Larry. Everybody knows the Reverso and the Alarm watches but they made some great chronos and normal dress watches.

JohnCote
 
Posts
12,939
Likes
51,711
Let's not forget their Triple calendar watches .. also classic.
 
Posts
3,456
Likes
7,943
Wow, might be 5 years back but I'll see, I was hoping Warren would pop by!