Has seen on Polerouter.de http://polerouter.de/images/collection/polerouter18-big.jpg http://polerouter.de/images/collection/polerouter47-big.jpg
Yes, I know. I am asking if it is only correct on the broad-arrow models. Conversely, is it incorrect if there are no broad arrow hands?
I tend to believe that the broad arrow models were all early enough to be confined to the bumper movements. But there are bumper Polerouters without BA hands.
Oh, I agree that the BH hands seem to have been used exclusively with dials including with outer ring shown above. Not all were lumed, of course (i.e. gold, gold capped). Also, there are examples with those dials that do not feature BA hands…
Are you suggesting that the Ebay one is not correct, having a microrotor (judging by the caseback shape). Another example: http://www.chrono24.de/universalgen...-automatic-micro-rotor-cal-215--id3062646.htm
Thoughts on this Polerouter with a 'J.W.Benson' signed dial? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/mens-nice...158?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_3&hash=item25a208d2a6Purchases made through these links may earn this site a commission from the eBay Partner Network
damn you guys have keen eyes! What points you to a redial? Redial as in fake (the cosign added later) or just cleaned up/repainted?
Redial as in reprinted. The co-signature might have been an original feature, but the whole thing has been repainted. Look at some of the UGs owned by members on this site, and compare fonts closely. The A's are a dead giveaway for me.
Well, the falling off is disrepair, not necessarily shenanigans. Except it looks like someone lumed the blank logo spot.