It’s hard to trust people these days… Let’s take a look at this Polerouter Genève that was sold on C24 last December, listed at around 900€:
The listing at the time stated:
Universal Genève Polerouter watch in perfect working order.
Gold-plated case in very good condition. Superb dial. Small original crown,
consistent with reference 569101/06.
(...)
The plexiglass has a crack. I have not replaced it as it is probably original. The buyer is free to replace it.
Please note there are scratches on the back of the watch.
A distinctive feature of the watch that makes it unique.
There is an error in the engraving of the reference number. The engraved reference number is 669101/06 instead of 569101/06. This is an error because the serial number and specifications correspond to the model. A unique feature for collectors.
...
Fast‑forward to a listing that went online today (
https://www.vinted.pt/items/8535815...boite-universal-geneve-bracelet-et-boucle-nos), apparently
already sold, this time listed for 1,490€.
It’s obviously the same watch, now on a different strap with a generic UG box added. Nothing inherently terrible about that in itself, but the description this time read:
Universal Genève polerouter Gerald Genta Full set, Universal Genève box, bracelet and buckle NOS
An exceptional collector's item for Universal Genève enthusiasts. I am offering this superb Polerouter Automatic (designed by Gérald Genta) in remarkable condition,
accompanied by a set of original accessories that are virtually impossible to find today. Rare technical feature: This watch bears the reference number 669101/06.
The prefix "6" is particularly sought after by collectors as it designates a high-quality reinforced gold-filled finish, much rarer and more durable than standard finishes. This model was produced for only six months in 1964 (Universal Genève production records).
The ensemble includes (
Full Set):
(...)
I really hope the use of “NOS” was meant for the bracelet only, but calling this a “full set” feels, at the very least, quite far‑fetched.
From a more “academic” standpoint, I think the more interesting discussion for us here is the question of this reference number, and which of the two sellers, with two very different stories/theories, is actually closer to reality.
I’ve yet to get my hands on a copy of The Polerouter Book (
@Mazoue , you know I won't be escaping for long), but in the meantime there’s always something to learn from the amazing experts here.
Thanks for reading!
