Oku
·The dial...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/122353872212
http://www.ebay.com/itm/122353872212
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Please consider donating to help offset our high running costs.
Hi, this watch looks too new.... could it be something fishy? In addition the seller rating is quite low at 100+
I've been watching this one also (I don't intend to make an offer). Signed crystal is a plus, especially if you can live with the crown as is or happen to have a spare on hand. Dial pics leave a bit to be desired (somewhat out of focus on the bottom half of the dial), movement looks clean.
Dear Severin,
[...] angle of the photo that fail to capture the lower half of the dial? [...]
This. The dial looks good to me, I only suspect the photos fail to capture crisply the text on the lower half of the dial. What looks like a correct font appears a bit fuzzy (for example, the flat top "A" in the word "Automatic" could be mistaken as a pointy "A" upon a cursory glance, or the entire word could be mistaken as an imprecise reprint).
As for the polish, I can't say for sure: the lug facets looks decent, although the caseback is somewhat worn; this could easily be a function of wear on the wrist. If it is polished, doesn't look like the worst polish ever. Hope this helps, perhaps others will have additional or contrary views.
I think they are the 80s version of universal, not my cup of tea.
not my cup of tea.
Can't believe this is a 1941 watch ...
http://www.chrono24.fr/universalgenve/compax-chronograph-steel--id5772133.htm
Is the lucky buyer member of the forum ?