Oku
·The dial...
http://www.ebay.com/itm/122353872212
http://www.ebay.com/itm/122353872212
This website may earn commission from Ebay sales.
Hi, this watch looks too new.... could it be something fishy? In addition the seller rating is quite low at 100+
I've been watching this one also (I don't intend to make an offer). Signed crystal is a plus, especially if you can live with the crown as is or happen to have a spare on hand. Dial pics leave a bit to be desired (somewhat out of focus on the bottom half of the dial), movement looks clean.
Dear Severin,
[...] angle of the photo that fail to capture the lower half of the dial? [...]
This. The dial looks good to me, I only suspect the photos fail to capture crisply the text on the lower half of the dial. What looks like a correct font appears a bit fuzzy (for example, the flat top "A" in the word "Automatic" could be mistaken as a pointy "A" upon a cursory glance, or the entire word could be mistaken as an imprecise reprint).
As for the polish, I can't say for sure: the lug facets looks decent, although the caseback is somewhat worn; this could easily be a function of wear on the wrist. If it is polished, doesn't look like the worst polish ever. Hope this helps, perhaps others will have additional or contrary views.
I think they are the 80s version of universal, not my cup of tea.
not my cup of tea.
Can't believe this is a 1941 watch ...
http://www.chrono24.fr/universalgenve/compax-chronograph-steel--id5772133.htm
Is the lucky buyer member of the forum ?