- Posts
- 799
- Likes
- 721
Hands90
·Seamaster. It's more wearable. The Speedy looks odd to me.
Trilogy Speedmaster for Trilogy Seamaster Swap, would you?
- Posts
- 132
- Likes
- 1,177
gr8sw
·firmly in the SM300 camp... in fact, one is on the FedEx truck for delivery here today! 👍
- Posts
- 1,289
- Likes
- 1,800
DIV
·Just checked, the bracelet numbers on SM300 and Speedy are actrually different! The SM (which I fitted) number is STZ006510 with end links marked (poss for historical reasons ) '6'. The Speedmaster LE bracelet code ends 6826 with the same '6' marking on the end link so there is a chance they are different. Not what I expected to be honest.
D'Oh, just noticed the word 'SEA' on the end link opposite the '6' so clearly the bracelets are different. Even weirder then that I got it to fit and Ed White.
- Posts
- 267
- Likes
- 302
Reborn
·Have been offered a swap of a Trilogy SM300 for my Trilogy Speedmaster plus a few quid (over double the original retail price difference). Both are full sets in good condition with virtually unworn straps and bracelets. Would you do it and if so, why?
- Posts
- 87
- Likes
- 52
sn0wman72
·If you already have a Speedmaster or two, I would certainly consider the trade
- Posts
- 785
- Likes
- 651
Perseus
·I found the trilogy Speedmaster considerably more desirable than the Seamaster. I think the 300mc has done a great job of refining the original design. If you really want an old school looking Seamaster I'd be just as happy with a Watchco.
- Posts
- 4
- Likes
- 31
Apollo 16
·I'd only sell my first moonwatch and possibly second for a trilogy Speedmaster, they sure are a great collection I haven't seen any of the trilogy in the flesh yet unfortunately. Enjoy!
Similar threads
- Posts
- 4
- Views
- 439
- Posts
- 8
- Views
- 17K
